F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Low 3DMark results for Ryzen 5 3600

Low 3DMark results for Ryzen 5 3600

Low 3DMark results for Ryzen 5 3600

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
L
ladymorepork
Posting Freak
791
07-21-2019, 09:15 PM
#11
The three titles I use for testing are GTA, Ghost Recon Wildlands, and Rainbow Six Siege.
L
ladymorepork
07-21-2019, 09:15 PM #11

The three titles I use for testing are GTA, Ghost Recon Wildlands, and Rainbow Six Siege.

E
Emir_Ersin
Junior Member
15
07-22-2019, 08:28 PM
#12
I see the numbers are on the lower end, but still acceptable. That’s similar to what I experienced in 3DMark—average to low scores, which seems fine since it suggests the hardware isn’t severely affected. The only significant improvement came when I pushed my GPU to extreme levels (just for fun). Most testers tend to overclock their systems, so lower stock settings aren’t surprising. Regarding the games, I haven’t played them and don’t know their difficulty, but I think Ghost Recon might be tough. If you want better performance, consider lowering the settings or upgrading your GPU and RAM, assuming you’re not CPU-limited. Overall, it looks normal to me. Top scores usually require around 2200 core clocks, so improvements are possible!
E
Emir_Ersin
07-22-2019, 08:28 PM #12

I see the numbers are on the lower end, but still acceptable. That’s similar to what I experienced in 3DMark—average to low scores, which seems fine since it suggests the hardware isn’t severely affected. The only significant improvement came when I pushed my GPU to extreme levels (just for fun). Most testers tend to overclock their systems, so lower stock settings aren’t surprising. Regarding the games, I haven’t played them and don’t know their difficulty, but I think Ghost Recon might be tough. If you want better performance, consider lowering the settings or upgrading your GPU and RAM, assuming you’re not CPU-limited. Overall, it looks normal to me. Top scores usually require around 2200 core clocks, so improvements are possible!

J
jReew
Member
61
07-22-2019, 09:56 PM
#13
These results differ from what you see online; actual performance varies widely based on settings and hardware.
J
jReew
07-22-2019, 09:56 PM #13

These results differ from what you see online; actual performance varies widely based on settings and hardware.

T
TheBozoPlays
Senior Member
642
07-23-2019, 11:39 AM
#14
He achieved an OC card score of 2200 and also reached a CPU speed of 4.4. It might be due to incorrect settings or drivers, but my benchmark results seem typical. Are you sure you're not testing against high-end hardware? Differences in game settings, such as lighting effects, can significantly affect performance. Also note that this test focuses more on the GPU than the CPU, so you may want to check that as well.
T
TheBozoPlays
07-23-2019, 11:39 AM #14

He achieved an OC card score of 2200 and also reached a CPU speed of 4.4. It might be due to incorrect settings or drivers, but my benchmark results seem typical. Are you sure you're not testing against high-end hardware? Differences in game settings, such as lighting effects, can significantly affect performance. Also note that this test focuses more on the GPU than the CPU, so you may want to check that as well.

C
CookieStars
Member
220
07-23-2019, 12:37 PM
#15
I noticed the link provided seems to be about a benchmark rather than hardware. It might not be directly related to your query.
C
CookieStars
07-23-2019, 12:37 PM #15

I noticed the link provided seems to be about a benchmark rather than hardware. It might not be directly related to your query.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2