F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems linuxautofs vs systemd automount

linuxautofs vs systemd automount

linuxautofs vs systemd automount

M
Maffin_
Member
Find
181
04-11-2023, 10:32 AM
#1
I'm familiar with automount and its common use in professional settings. I'm also interested in understanding your preference and any performance advantages one method might offer.
Reply
Reply
M
Maffin_
04-11-2023, 10:32 AM #1

I'm familiar with automount and its common use in professional settings. I'm also interested in understanding your preference and any performance advantages one method might offer.

Reply
Reply
P
Poop_Head27
Posting Freak
Find
820
04-11-2023, 03:45 PM
#2
I mentioned using systemd automount since I don’t really like the autofs syntax and I prefer simpler options. Autofs remains a useful tool nonetheless.
Reply
Reply
P
Poop_Head27
04-11-2023, 03:45 PM #2

I mentioned using systemd automount since I don’t really like the autofs syntax and I prefer simpler options. Autofs remains a useful tool nonetheless.

Reply
Reply
E
Erls
Junior Member
Find
27
04-13-2023, 04:24 AM
#3
It’s understandable—having two files for automount can seem tricky.
Reply
Reply
E
Erls
04-13-2023, 04:24 AM #3

It’s understandable—having two files for automount can seem tricky.

Reply
Reply
D
davidtzu
Junior Member
Find
14
04-13-2023, 09:40 AM
#4
The issue with fstab is that it can cause boot problems if not configured correctly.
Reply
Reply
D
davidtzu
04-13-2023, 09:40 AM #4

The issue with fstab is that it can cause boot problems if not configured correctly.

Reply
Reply
M
MeLikeUnicorns
Member
Find
61
04-15-2023, 03:30 AM
#5
To my understanding, securing a mount with autofs isn't straightforward. Systemd mount units can still serve as dependencies for other systemd services or applications. Beyond that, the main distinctions seem to lie in their setup rather than functionality. The fstab file alone is just a standard tool for managing mounts, while in systemd environments it's handled by systemd-fstab-generator which creates mount and automount configurations. Using autofs eliminates the option to manage automounts through fstab.
Reply
Reply
M
MeLikeUnicorns
04-15-2023, 03:30 AM #5

To my understanding, securing a mount with autofs isn't straightforward. Systemd mount units can still serve as dependencies for other systemd services or applications. Beyond that, the main distinctions seem to lie in their setup rather than functionality. The fstab file alone is just a standard tool for managing mounts, while in systemd environments it's handled by systemd-fstab-generator which creates mount and automount configurations. Using autofs eliminates the option to manage automounts through fstab.

Reply
Reply
L
Lagoudale
Member
Find
66
04-15-2023, 08:56 PM
#6
That wasn't on my radar before. I actually have a service running on my server that relies on files from an external drive.
Reply
Reply
L
Lagoudale
04-15-2023, 08:56 PM #6

That wasn't on my radar before. I actually have a service running on my server that relies on files from an external drive.

Reply
Reply
U
Unmigrate
Senior Member
Find
644
04-16-2023, 02:24 AM
#7
Been relying on autofs for several months now, mainly to set up NFS shares for my Plex server. It’s been really smooth—just configure and let it run. I picked it because there were helpful YouTube tutorials that matched what I needed. Plus, the auto-connect and auto-disconnect features are a big plus.
Reply
Reply
U
Unmigrate
04-16-2023, 02:24 AM #7

Been relying on autofs for several months now, mainly to set up NFS shares for my Plex server. It’s been really smooth—just configure and let it run. I picked it because there were helpful YouTube tutorials that matched what I needed. Plus, the auto-connect and auto-disconnect features are a big plus.

Reply
Reply