Linux vs Windows
Linux vs Windows
Sure, I believe testing both Windows and Linux on the gaming rig would be a good idea, followed by running Windows on the streaming PC.
I recently moved from Windows to Linux for my primary system and use virtual machines for my high-performance setup. Here are some insights that might help you. Gaming: The outcome depends on the titles you play. Most games are available on Linux, though some older or niche titles may be limited. However, many AAA games lack official Linux versions. Tools like WINE can run Windows apps on Linux, but they’re unreliable. Steam doesn’t support non-Linux games natively. The external storage option is tricky—using a NAS works well, but you’d need to plug in a USB drive each time. Linux and Windows can’t run the same software; most games rely on DX9/DX11, .NET, and .exe files that don’t translate easily. You could store game assets locally and link them from both OSes, but it requires technical know-how and time. Running both systems: This approach can work if you manage resources carefully. However, maintaining two environments is complex. You’ll face issues with file visibility, naming conflicts, and potential crashes if not handled properly. It might be worth it only if you’re comfortable troubleshooting and value your time. Linux has its own challenges—software compatibility, installation steps, and a steep learning curve. If you need specific programs like Microsoft Office or Excel, Linux may not suit you. The transition isn’t straightforward; many users find it more involved than on Windows. Ultimately, weigh your needs against the effort. If you’re curious, give it a try, but be prepared for a learning process.