F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Linux surpasses Windows by 48% in A Hat in Time

Linux surpasses Windows by 48% in A Hat in Time

Linux surpasses Windows by 48% in A Hat in Time

_
_iGummiRissa_
Member
115
10-20-2017, 02:52 PM
#1
The frame rates are 48% greater than the standard Windows performance. When using DXVK on Windows with Vulkan, the frame rates rise by an additional 25%. Valve’s updates to the Linux graphics drivers were skipped due to a bug that led to crashes. Once the issue is resolved, Linux is expected to deliver even better results. This observation was made with a Vega 56 graphics card. Detailed system specifications are available in the video description.
_
_iGummiRissa_
10-20-2017, 02:52 PM #1

The frame rates are 48% greater than the standard Windows performance. When using DXVK on Windows with Vulkan, the frame rates rise by an additional 25%. Valve’s updates to the Linux graphics drivers were skipped due to a bug that led to crashes. Once the issue is resolved, Linux is expected to deliver even better results. This observation was made with a Vega 56 graphics card. Detailed system specifications are available in the video description.

P
Prawnflakes
Member
204
10-20-2017, 04:55 PM
#2
-Shifted to PC Gaming-
Kindly review the Tech News posting rules before sharing
P
Prawnflakes
10-20-2017, 04:55 PM #2

-Shifted to PC Gaming-
Kindly review the Tech News posting rules before sharing

T
136
10-22-2017, 04:58 PM
#3
You can view the video without any interruptions. Linux performs significantly better in rendering this game on AMD graphics than Windows.
T
TurboN_GGA9000
10-22-2017, 04:58 PM #3

You can view the video without any interruptions. Linux performs significantly better in rendering this game on AMD graphics than Windows.

M
MasMenno
Member
199
11-02-2017, 03:03 AM
#4
News reports highlight how Valve's efforts to enhance Linux performance are yielding results. Additionally, a summary of the topic has been completed.
M
MasMenno
11-02-2017, 03:03 AM #4

News reports highlight how Valve's efforts to enhance Linux performance are yielding results. Additionally, a summary of the topic has been completed.

K
Kay_macedo
Member
66
11-02-2017, 04:55 AM
#5
We don’t consider this particular YouTube video to be a reliable source for news.
K
Kay_macedo
11-02-2017, 04:55 AM #5

We don’t consider this particular YouTube video to be a reliable source for news.

S
sst04
Member
208
11-02-2017, 08:03 AM
#6
I don’t.   Or rather I do because someone or other is trying to make a point, but the issue has been around for 30 years.  I’ve seen tests like this get done time and time again, and they’re always a bit tweaked because the people doing them have an agenda and can’t help themselves.  Sometimes they’re pro Linux, sometimes they’re pro mac, sometimes they’re pro windows.  They generally wind up saying more or less the same thing:
Am64 just isn’t that great.  But it’s not terrible either.  What’s surprising about it really is how little it sucks.
Am64 has inertia, and it’s got a whole heck of a lot of it.  All of the various systems and OSes and whatnot are pretty close to each other performance wise.  Wintel, a word with more or less no meaning anymore but still describes the concept.  Is not in front performance wise and never has been.  It’s in the back now.  There were things farther in the back.  68k Macintosh was worse.  AppleDOS was worse. MSDOS was worst of all.   Part of the problem really. That’s really about it though.  What it has is development.
S
sst04
11-02-2017, 08:03 AM #6

I don’t.   Or rather I do because someone or other is trying to make a point, but the issue has been around for 30 years.  I’ve seen tests like this get done time and time again, and they’re always a bit tweaked because the people doing them have an agenda and can’t help themselves.  Sometimes they’re pro Linux, sometimes they’re pro mac, sometimes they’re pro windows.  They generally wind up saying more or less the same thing:
Am64 just isn’t that great.  But it’s not terrible either.  What’s surprising about it really is how little it sucks.
Am64 has inertia, and it’s got a whole heck of a lot of it.  All of the various systems and OSes and whatnot are pretty close to each other performance wise.  Wintel, a word with more or less no meaning anymore but still describes the concept.  Is not in front performance wise and never has been.  It’s in the back now.  There were things farther in the back.  68k Macintosh was worse.  AppleDOS was worse. MSDOS was worst of all.   Part of the problem really. That’s really about it though.  What it has is development.

B
77
11-02-2017, 02:19 PM
#7
Amazing.
B
Boa_Hancock_OP
11-02-2017, 02:19 PM #7

Amazing.

2
2Gustav
Member
59
11-02-2017, 08:38 PM
#8
The game utilizes DX9, which is logical. I notice improved performance with DXVK in Guildwars 2 versus the original DX9 version as well.
2
2Gustav
11-02-2017, 08:38 PM #8

The game utilizes DX9, which is logical. I notice improved performance with DXVK in Guildwars 2 versus the original DX9 version as well.

A
alexandre6768
Member
219
11-03-2017, 01:10 AM
#9
If it's about changing DX9 to Vulkan, that's fine.
A
alexandre6768
11-03-2017, 01:10 AM #9

If it's about changing DX9 to Vulkan, that's fine.