F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Linux compatible with Pentium III processors

Linux compatible with Pentium III processors

Linux compatible with Pentium III processors

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
N
nadi488
Member
53
12-22-2016, 02:04 PM
#11
Xubuntu works well. Be sure to download the 32-bit edition.
N
nadi488
12-22-2016, 02:04 PM #11

Xubuntu works well. Be sure to download the 32-bit edition.

A
Alexandrondon
Member
58
12-22-2016, 03:10 PM
#12
Is this really possible with an older Ubuntu version? The newer releases can be quite demanding, even on somewhat modern systems. Lubuntu and Xubuntu should function fine. I’d suggest Mint, especially Mint XFCE, for better reliability on this machine.
A
Alexandrondon
12-22-2016, 03:10 PM #12

Is this really possible with an older Ubuntu version? The newer releases can be quite demanding, even on somewhat modern systems. Lubuntu and Xubuntu should function fine. I’d suggest Mint, especially Mint XFCE, for better reliability on this machine.

G
gaLact1cfLea
Member
194
12-22-2016, 05:00 PM
#13
It's much lighter than Windows, and skipping third-party downloads during the first install makes it even more compact. That's why I suggested version 14.04, though you can still try an older release like 12.04 if needed.
G
gaLact1cfLea
12-22-2016, 05:00 PM #13

It's much lighter than Windows, and skipping third-party downloads during the first install makes it even more compact. That's why I suggested version 14.04, though you can still try an older release like 12.04 if needed.

K
kenton12
Member
204
12-27-2016, 02:37 AM
#14
I prefer LXDE more than XFCE. I used Lubuntu on my old P4 (T43) for many years until I swapped it out about a year ago.
K
kenton12
12-27-2016, 02:37 AM #14

I prefer LXDE more than XFCE. I used Lubuntu on my old P4 (T43) for many years until I swapped it out about a year ago.

P
PhilZstar
Member
198
01-01-2017, 08:12 AM
#15
DSL fell out of favor around 2008, but there was a revival attempt in 2012. Things got complicated afterward. A contributor moved focus to tiny core Linux, and you can explore it at http://tinycorelinux.net. It’s only about 16MB.
P
PhilZstar
01-01-2017, 08:12 AM #15

DSL fell out of favor around 2008, but there was a revival attempt in 2012. Things got complicated afterward. A contributor moved focus to tiny core Linux, and you can explore it at http://tinycorelinux.net. It’s only about 16MB.

N
Nuke_Sky
Junior Member
9
01-07-2017, 08:33 PM
#16
Visit AntiX at http://antix.mepis.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
S
108
01-07-2017, 10:14 PM
#17
I recall this being an older update, but Legacy OS performs quite nicely on my Pentium II 400MHz. The system even supported built-in surround sound via the motherboard, which is quite unusual for that hardware. You can find more info here: HERE This will take you to DistroWatch.
S
Suicide_Senpai
01-07-2017, 10:14 PM #17

I recall this being an older update, but Legacy OS performs quite nicely on my Pentium II 400MHz. The system even supported built-in surround sound via the motherboard, which is quite unusual for that hardware. You can find more info here: HERE This will take you to DistroWatch.

V
Viitin7
Member
214
01-11-2017, 05:30 AM
#18
For OS options, especially older Windows versions, WinWorldPC is a good choice. They offer a wide range of archived operating systems, and since they're abandonware, you can download them legally at no cost. WinWorldPC Library
V
Viitin7
01-11-2017, 05:30 AM #18

For OS options, especially older Windows versions, WinWorldPC is a good choice. They offer a wide range of archived operating systems, and since they're abandonware, you can download them legally at no cost. WinWorldPC Library

X
xAdriLCT
Senior Member
702
01-11-2017, 10:30 PM
#19
I know that this is an old thread but i must answer. Because i have old laptop with exactly same spec. It's Dell C600 from 2001. It has 1 GHZ Pentium III + 256 MB RAM (SDRAM 133MHZ) + 8 MB ATI GPU. Currently i run on it tinyXP which is a windows XPs modified version. At startup it consumes 70-80 MB of ram. RAM is enough for PowerAMP (music player) + Older version of firefox with only one tab. Or Just firefox with only 2 tabs. I have tried puppy linux on it and it actually ran better then XP. It was faster, much newer, much more secure and consumed less RAM. Now i have lost CD ROM and i am stuck with this OS. Hinges are broken and battery died. I like old stuff and i want to renew it and somehow install linux on it. I myself want arch. Arch + i3-gaps my favorite light linux setup. I have it on my modern laptop and at my work on laptop too. It's superfast and consumes ~120 MB RAM. If PC had 256 MB it would consume much less then. Also i would do things to optimize ram usage. I think arch linux is the best choice with any hardware. Of cource hardware must be faster then potatoe to run arch
X
xAdriLCT
01-11-2017, 10:30 PM #19

I know that this is an old thread but i must answer. Because i have old laptop with exactly same spec. It's Dell C600 from 2001. It has 1 GHZ Pentium III + 256 MB RAM (SDRAM 133MHZ) + 8 MB ATI GPU. Currently i run on it tinyXP which is a windows XPs modified version. At startup it consumes 70-80 MB of ram. RAM is enough for PowerAMP (music player) + Older version of firefox with only one tab. Or Just firefox with only 2 tabs. I have tried puppy linux on it and it actually ran better then XP. It was faster, much newer, much more secure and consumed less RAM. Now i have lost CD ROM and i am stuck with this OS. Hinges are broken and battery died. I like old stuff and i want to renew it and somehow install linux on it. I myself want arch. Arch + i3-gaps my favorite light linux setup. I have it on my modern laptop and at my work on laptop too. It's superfast and consumes ~120 MB RAM. If PC had 256 MB it would consume much less then. Also i would do things to optimize ram usage. I think arch linux is the best choice with any hardware. Of cource hardware must be faster then potatoe to run arch

Pages (2): Previous 1 2