F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Limit of 0.300v applies to AORUS M, standard for all B450 boards?

Limit of 0.300v applies to AORUS M, standard for all B450 boards?

Limit of 0.300v applies to AORUS M, standard for all B450 boards?

C
CuzImOrange
Junior Member
21
01-10-2020, 08:59 PM
#1
The AORUS M features a minimal BIOS setup for overclocking, relying on dynamic voltage control instead of fixed values. I must set precise adjustments of +0.000v starting from 1.10v for the CPU. Any deviation from 1.10v triggers automatic voltage changes, so I need to constantly check BIOS outputs and monitoring tools to track performance levels. The cost reflects this approach—around $75. My Z270M-ITX/ac board uses fixed voltage, allowing stable settings like 1.40v. Are there B450/B550 models with fixed voltage support? Boards that allow higher voltages generally offer more flexibility. With the current limits of 1.10v ±0.000v and a max of 1.40v, I’m restricted to around 4.4GHz at +0.288v (±0.12v). Reaching 4.5GHz seems unlikely even at slightly higher voltages. The issue appears board-related rather than CPU-specific. Temperatures are normal, components operate within safe ranges, and voltage readings remain consistent. If anyone knows how the IMC and FCLK are managed, or if boosting this could help stabilize higher clocks, that would be helpful. Thanks!
C
CuzImOrange
01-10-2020, 08:59 PM #1

The AORUS M features a minimal BIOS setup for overclocking, relying on dynamic voltage control instead of fixed values. I must set precise adjustments of +0.000v starting from 1.10v for the CPU. Any deviation from 1.10v triggers automatic voltage changes, so I need to constantly check BIOS outputs and monitoring tools to track performance levels. The cost reflects this approach—around $75. My Z270M-ITX/ac board uses fixed voltage, allowing stable settings like 1.40v. Are there B450/B550 models with fixed voltage support? Boards that allow higher voltages generally offer more flexibility. With the current limits of 1.10v ±0.000v and a max of 1.40v, I’m restricted to around 4.4GHz at +0.288v (±0.12v). Reaching 4.5GHz seems unlikely even at slightly higher voltages. The issue appears board-related rather than CPU-specific. Temperatures are normal, components operate within safe ranges, and voltage readings remain consistent. If anyone knows how the IMC and FCLK are managed, or if boosting this could help stabilize higher clocks, that would be helpful. Thanks!

F
fireroster
Member
150
01-11-2020, 12:45 AM
#2
You're looking at a 1.1V reading, which isn't typical for consumer Ryzen desktop CPUs. It seems the default voltage might be set higher than expected, potentially increasing with auto settings. Adding +0.3V to the auto settings could help, though it won't affect core clocks directly. Adjusting VDDG and VDDP are more relevant for IMC and FCLK control.
F
fireroster
01-11-2020, 12:45 AM #2

You're looking at a 1.1V reading, which isn't typical for consumer Ryzen desktop CPUs. It seems the default voltage might be set higher than expected, potentially increasing with auto settings. Adding +0.3V to the auto settings could help, though it won't affect core clocks directly. Adjusting VDDG and VDDP are more relevant for IMC and FCLK control.

S
Samara2005
Member
151
01-20-2020, 04:11 PM
#3
Ryzen Master displays VCore as 1.1v despite applying +0.000v tweaks. Only tools like OCCT, CPUZ, HWINFO, and HWMonitor reflect VCore changes. I'm sure Precision Boost could push it past 1.4v if my CPU was around 1.45v with boost active.
S
Samara2005
01-20-2020, 04:11 PM #3

Ryzen Master displays VCore as 1.1v despite applying +0.000v tweaks. Only tools like OCCT, CPUZ, HWINFO, and HWMonitor reflect VCore changes. I'm sure Precision Boost could push it past 1.4v if my CPU was around 1.45v with boost active.