F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Likely an unwise inquiry.

Likely an unwise inquiry.

Likely an unwise inquiry.

I
iMonsterPlayz
Junior Member
15
10-13-2016, 03:44 PM
#1
Both my main desktop and NAS PC have built-in 2.5G NICs. My home router only has 1G ports. Do I really need a separate 2.5G switch to use that speed when transferring files, or should the router also support 2.5G? That’s probably just a simple question. Thanks!
I
iMonsterPlayz
10-13-2016, 03:44 PM #1

Both my main desktop and NAS PC have built-in 2.5G NICs. My home router only has 1G ports. Do I really need a separate 2.5G switch to use that speed when transferring files, or should the router also support 2.5G? That’s probably just a simple question. Thanks!

I
IzADerpCookie
Member
228
10-17-2016, 06:11 AM
#2
I think the router would have to be at 2.5gs to but start by buying the switch first and see the speeds before buying a new router, and this is a good question
I
IzADerpCookie
10-17-2016, 06:11 AM #2

I think the router would have to be at 2.5gs to but start by buying the switch first and see the speeds before buying a new router, and this is a good question

A
AE_Beast
Junior Member
32
10-17-2016, 03:06 PM
#3
All equipment must support 2.5 Gbps for those speeds, including the switch. The drives inside the devices also need to handle reading and writing at that rate. If your NAS uses older or slower storage that can’t reach 200–250MBps, it won’t overload the network. I typically see around 280 MBps when moving big files from NVME to NVME over the network.
A
AE_Beast
10-17-2016, 03:06 PM #3

All equipment must support 2.5 Gbps for those speeds, including the switch. The drives inside the devices also need to handle reading and writing at that rate. If your NAS uses older or slower storage that can’t reach 200–250MBps, it won’t overload the network. I typically see around 280 MBps when moving big files from NVME to NVME over the network.

E
Eusebio06
Senior Member
595
10-19-2016, 03:35 AM
#4
No! The router doesn't have to be 2.5g. Just the PC, NAS, and switch need it. The local network isn't connected to the router; it's only giving the IP address here. Once that's done, everything goes around the router. However, your hard drive speed might still be the issue.
E
Eusebio06
10-19-2016, 03:35 AM #4

No! The router doesn't have to be 2.5g. Just the PC, NAS, and switch need it. The local network isn't connected to the router; it's only giving the IP address here. Once that's done, everything goes around the router. However, your hard drive speed might still be the issue.

_
__ALEX_RIDER__
Junior Member
34
10-19-2016, 03:42 AM
#5
Not overly simple with your varied responses. As @Blue4130 mentioned, using a 2.5gbit switch means traffic between your NAS and computer runs at 2.5gbit speeds (provided your storage supports it), while internet traffic from the computer to the web moves at 1gbit. This is the configuration I have. Two computers and a NAS all operate at 2.5gbit, connected via a 2.5gbit switch to an internet router that only supports 1gbit.
_
__ALEX_RIDER__
10-19-2016, 03:42 AM #5

Not overly simple with your varied responses. As @Blue4130 mentioned, using a 2.5gbit switch means traffic between your NAS and computer runs at 2.5gbit speeds (provided your storage supports it), while internet traffic from the computer to the web moves at 1gbit. This is the configuration I have. Two computers and a NAS all operate at 2.5gbit, connected via a 2.5gbit switch to an internet router that only supports 1gbit.

J
JediMasterDez
Member
52
10-19-2016, 04:37 AM
#6
Your main storage uses spinning disks, while your 2TB NVMe drive serves as a fast cache.
J
JediMasterDez
10-19-2016, 04:37 AM #6

Your main storage uses spinning disks, while your 2TB NVMe drive serves as a fast cache.

D
DropletJ
Junior Member
44
10-22-2016, 10:28 PM
#7
I began exploring home routers and thought I wouldn't need an upgrade. But I'm relocating soon, so I planned to upgrade them.
D
DropletJ
10-22-2016, 10:28 PM #7

I began exploring home routers and thought I wouldn't need an upgrade. But I'm relocating soon, so I planned to upgrade them.

K
kcristan
Senior Member
514
10-28-2016, 07:41 AM
#8
The flash storage is rated for high write cycles endurance. A RAID0 configuration using around 15,000 SAS disks would sacrifice speed but avoid write cycle limitations, potentially lasting about 10 years. NVMe drives generally match the lifespan of spinning disks in terms of write endurance.
K
kcristan
10-28-2016, 07:41 AM #8

The flash storage is rated for high write cycles endurance. A RAID0 configuration using around 15,000 SAS disks would sacrifice speed but avoid write cycle limitations, potentially lasting about 10 years. NVMe drives generally match the lifespan of spinning disks in terms of write endurance.