F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Lego Games evaluation outcomes for Snapdragon X Plus with Windows 11 on ARM laptop

Lego Games evaluation outcomes for Snapdragon X Plus with Windows 11 on ARM laptop

Lego Games evaluation outcomes for Snapdragon X Plus with Windows 11 on ARM laptop

D
dr4gen_sl4y3r
Member
Find
151
10-01-2018, 08:08 PM
#1
I've evaluated most TT Lego titles on my Snapdragon X Plus Windows 11 laptop. Keep in mind that none of these games support ARM64 natively, the X Elite chip offers superior graphics, and the next generation of these processors is coming soon—making this a challenging situation for the current setup. I haven't listed exact scores for every title, but the included ones should provide a solid overview of performance across older and newer Lego releases.

Testing covered a range from 800x600 at low settings to 1920x1200 at high settings.

Lego Batman 1: Tested in main menu, lowest 200, highest 95.
Lego Harry Potter 1: Three tests; lowest 135, highest 55.
Lego Indiana Jones 1: First version black screen; second version 150 lowest, 65 highest.
Lego Batman 2: Works, but shader quality remains unchanged regardless of settings—menu shaders don’t improve, only main menu. Performance stays around 60 FPS even at lowest.
Lego City Undercover: Smooth traversal, but noticeable stutter similar to Mac.
Lego Harry Potter 5-7: Graphics issues resembling Batman 2, with frame drops at low settings.
Lego Jurassic World: Performance drops to 40 FPS at 1920x1200, stuttering like on an x86 PC.
Lego Marvel Super Heroes: Significant stuttering and FPS drops while flying over NYC, comparable to x86 results.
Lego Marvel's Avengers: Performance drops to 110 at lowest, 40 at highest.
Lego The Movie: Works well, good performance; Harry Potter 2 is more demanding, about a quarter of the previous game’s speed.
Lego Ninjago: Less demanding than Harry Potter 2, but still quite taxing.
Lego Pirates: Functions with Lego Force Awakens and Hobbits; max settings give great results.
Lego Incredibles: Too GPU-intensive, rarely hits 60 FPS even at lowest settings.
Lego Lord of the Rings: Struggles to maintain 60 FPS, especially at 800x600.

If you have any questions or want more detailed feedback, feel free to share your thoughts below.
Reply
Reply
D
dr4gen_sl4y3r
10-01-2018, 08:08 PM #1

I've evaluated most TT Lego titles on my Snapdragon X Plus Windows 11 laptop. Keep in mind that none of these games support ARM64 natively, the X Elite chip offers superior graphics, and the next generation of these processors is coming soon—making this a challenging situation for the current setup. I haven't listed exact scores for every title, but the included ones should provide a solid overview of performance across older and newer Lego releases.

Testing covered a range from 800x600 at low settings to 1920x1200 at high settings.

Lego Batman 1: Tested in main menu, lowest 200, highest 95.
Lego Harry Potter 1: Three tests; lowest 135, highest 55.
Lego Indiana Jones 1: First version black screen; second version 150 lowest, 65 highest.
Lego Batman 2: Works, but shader quality remains unchanged regardless of settings—menu shaders don’t improve, only main menu. Performance stays around 60 FPS even at lowest.
Lego City Undercover: Smooth traversal, but noticeable stutter similar to Mac.
Lego Harry Potter 5-7: Graphics issues resembling Batman 2, with frame drops at low settings.
Lego Jurassic World: Performance drops to 40 FPS at 1920x1200, stuttering like on an x86 PC.
Lego Marvel Super Heroes: Significant stuttering and FPS drops while flying over NYC, comparable to x86 results.
Lego Marvel's Avengers: Performance drops to 110 at lowest, 40 at highest.
Lego The Movie: Works well, good performance; Harry Potter 2 is more demanding, about a quarter of the previous game’s speed.
Lego Ninjago: Less demanding than Harry Potter 2, but still quite taxing.
Lego Pirates: Functions with Lego Force Awakens and Hobbits; max settings give great results.
Lego Incredibles: Too GPU-intensive, rarely hits 60 FPS even at lowest settings.
Lego Lord of the Rings: Struggles to maintain 60 FPS, especially at 800x600.

If you have any questions or want more detailed feedback, feel free to share your thoughts below.

Reply
Reply