Latency in DDR5 seems excessive.
Latency in DDR5 seems excessive.
Well ddr4 lasted for 8 years with ddr3 lasting ~7 years so either ddr5 lasts longer or itll break this trend and last a shorter time Then theres also the perfect dirt cheap budget chip which is 8gbit rev e, 20$ for 2666 bare pcb crucials with anything from d9vpp to c9bjz in terms of ic bin and capability of 4600+ c18 assuming board and cpu arent an issue, also being very light on the imc which means possibility of dual rank at high speeds Add to that stupid high bin hynix djrs that can do 5600+ on air if pushed to 1.7-1.9v like on those 5333 bin kits with loose timings, sure latency isnt great but bandwidth go brrrrrr Though ddr4 is best ran with dual rank and i doubt 5000+ is possible without subzero cpu, rev e will prob come the closest since its very light on the imc. ddr5 on the other hand doesnt benifit much from dual rank which means single sided configs go vroom vroom once ddr5 matures and ~7200 becomes standard