F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop I've never been concerned about this, so I don't know.

I've never been concerned about this, so I don't know.

I've never been concerned about this, so I don't know.

A
152
07-12-2016, 05:02 PM
#1
I assemble a PC and check the compatibility chart for the motherboard. I choose the best options within my budget. DRR4 always came with 3200 MHz, and if XMP is available, I click it—if it performs well, I leave it. My friend brought in a shiny DDR 4000 2x8GB stick. He insists it’s the right choice and can’t be wrong. Both of us seem similar in performance, and we’re not ranking on leaderboards. I found the BIOS settings and set it to XMP1 with 4000 MHz. In Task Manager, under Performance, I see 4000 MT/s—does this mean it’s running smoothly? Thanks ahead of time. I have no idea about memory latency, space-time continuum, or what my wife thinks. Let’s skip those topics for now.
A
AgentDarkJewel
07-12-2016, 05:02 PM #1

I assemble a PC and check the compatibility chart for the motherboard. I choose the best options within my budget. DRR4 always came with 3200 MHz, and if XMP is available, I click it—if it performs well, I leave it. My friend brought in a shiny DDR 4000 2x8GB stick. He insists it’s the right choice and can’t be wrong. Both of us seem similar in performance, and we’re not ranking on leaderboards. I found the BIOS settings and set it to XMP1 with 4000 MHz. In Task Manager, under Performance, I see 4000 MT/s—does this mean it’s running smoothly? Thanks ahead of time. I have no idea about memory latency, space-time continuum, or what my wife thinks. Let’s skip those topics for now.

D
Dragonfriz
Junior Member
12
07-12-2016, 06:35 PM
#2
It seems to function at the expected pace. You might want to check other tools such as hwinfo to confirm the speed.
D
Dragonfriz
07-12-2016, 06:35 PM #2

It seems to function at the expected pace. You might want to check other tools such as hwinfo to confirm the speed.

M
Mikeahl
Member
196
07-22-2016, 10:55 AM
#3
Here are a few alternative phrasings:

- The images captured by HWINFO seem unclear and don't provide any useful information.
- I'm having trouble interpreting the screenshots from HWINFO.
- The visual output from HWINFO appears confusing and lacks clarity.
M
Mikeahl
07-22-2016, 10:55 AM #3

Here are a few alternative phrasings:

- The images captured by HWINFO seem unclear and don't provide any useful information.
- I'm having trouble interpreting the screenshots from HWINFO.
- The visual output from HWINFO appears confusing and lacks clarity.

S
SkyVail
Junior Member
14
07-27-2016, 03:59 PM
#4
CPUZ states this.
S
SkyVail
07-27-2016, 03:59 PM #4

CPUZ states this.

R
RulwenJr
Posting Freak
786
08-13-2016, 02:07 AM
#5
The RAM operates at 2000MHz and, being DDR, achieves a speed of 4000MT/s. This confirms it functions properly. A relevant post from the hwinfo forum clarifies this: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/hwi...peed.6042/
R
RulwenJr
08-13-2016, 02:07 AM #5

The RAM operates at 2000MHz and, being DDR, achieves a speed of 4000MT/s. This confirms it functions properly. A relevant post from the hwinfo forum clarifies this: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/hwi...peed.6042/

L
LpLuks
Member
141
08-13-2016, 06:31 AM
#6
They simply couldn't have just doubled the dam. It's fascinating how computers present a flood of data, overwhelming us without offering clear insights. I appreciate the humor in that statement—it really highlights the irony.
L
LpLuks
08-13-2016, 06:31 AM #6

They simply couldn't have just doubled the dam. It's fascinating how computers present a flood of data, overwhelming us without offering clear insights. I appreciate the humor in that statement—it really highlights the irony.

Z
ZeRkozz
Junior Member
2
08-14-2016, 08:31 PM
#7
The highest speed is determined by your CPU model and the motherboard. The quality of the connections between the CPU socket and memory slots, as well as the number of layers in the circuit board, play a role. These layers help keep signals cleaner by reducing interference from other components. For instance, early Ryzen chips used weaker memory controllers that could only handle around 3600 Mhz. On those older motherboards, you might run just two sticks at full speed, but adding more often limited you to 3200 Mhz or less. Later Ryzen models improved this to about 3733 Mhz, which meant most sticks stayed at 3600 Mhz, and differences came from timing settings rather than raw speed. The actual performance could be similar if you adjusted the timings instead of changing the frequency.
Z
ZeRkozz
08-14-2016, 08:31 PM #7

The highest speed is determined by your CPU model and the motherboard. The quality of the connections between the CPU socket and memory slots, as well as the number of layers in the circuit board, play a role. These layers help keep signals cleaner by reducing interference from other components. For instance, early Ryzen chips used weaker memory controllers that could only handle around 3600 Mhz. On those older motherboards, you might run just two sticks at full speed, but adding more often limited you to 3200 Mhz or less. Later Ryzen models improved this to about 3733 Mhz, which meant most sticks stayed at 3600 Mhz, and differences came from timing settings rather than raw speed. The actual performance could be similar if you adjusted the timings instead of changing the frequency.

C
Cutie_Kitcat
Senior Member
644
08-14-2016, 11:28 PM
#8
For better understanding, 3600 MT/s (which equals 1800 MHz) means a decrease rather than an increase in frequency compared to the current 1995 MHz. AMD's infinity fabric typically caps around 1900 MHz. Exceeding this leads to a 1:2 trade-off between memory speed and input frequency—effectively lowering it to about 997 MHz, potentially causing reduced performance versus running memory and IF at the same but slower rate.
C
Cutie_Kitcat
08-14-2016, 11:28 PM #8

For better understanding, 3600 MT/s (which equals 1800 MHz) means a decrease rather than an increase in frequency compared to the current 1995 MHz. AMD's infinity fabric typically caps around 1900 MHz. Exceeding this leads to a 1:2 trade-off between memory speed and input frequency—effectively lowering it to about 997 MHz, potentially causing reduced performance versus running memory and IF at the same but slower rate.