It's a mystery why *The Witcher 3* received such positive feedback.
It's a mystery why *The Witcher 3* received such positive feedback.
Outside of battle the movement feels a bit awkward, but it doesn’t need to look like a typical western RPG. The game offers many strong features, so minor issues can be easily ignored by most players. If you find them hard to overlook, it’s perfectly okay. You don’t have to enjoy games that others prefer. I’m sure reviewers often talked about movement and UI flaws. If you’re someone who can’t ignore those points, you should have paid attention before deciding. Unless the reviews you read didn’t highlight these problems, it might be worth checking other sources.
It seems like you're questioning your performance in the game.
Movement is deliberately this way. It seems you're not very skilled, right? Anyone can easily progress through the game at Story and sword difficulty if you're a beginner.
Played the game but didn't grasp the excitement around it. Removed the first title after 15 minutes because the fights looked strange. I expected my characters to wield swords in one hand while cutting through enemies. The intro made it easy to kill monsters quickly, but the castle battle felt tough due to too many simple victories that took too long for a character described as a typical human. My expectations were high, probably because I saw gameplay videos of Witcher 3 earlier.
The game has a few issues, especially with the awkward controls, but the strengths really shine. Overall, I think it's one of the top experiences I've had recently and possibly the best ever. I'm still exploring it for about 110 hours, and the sheer volume of content is impressive.
It’s not that you’re bad at Witcher 3—it’s not a game that demands great skill, just a bit of cluelessness...
He claims he tried the initial option and didn’t like it. He’s viewed videos of version three, which he finds appealing.