It offers high frame rates with minimal input lag, providing a smoother experience.
It offers high frame rates with minimal input lag, providing a smoother experience.
I noticed a discussion on a forum about high frame rates on low-ping servers. I recently got a 240Hz display and playing games like PUBG and CS feels off. I've used various refresh rates—60, 100, 120, and 144Hz—and this isn't about FPS or Hz itself. It's more about networking, latency, and what you can actually see. If anyone has real insights, I'd really appreciate it. One idea is that with a fast screen, minor issues become more obvious. Fingers crossed!
Tickrate indicates how frequently a server refreshes, and while PUBG advertises a 30Hz rate, real performance varies due to player density. This can lead to noticeable inconsistencies since updates don’t occur quickly enough for rapid gameplay. A higher refresh monitor improves personal experience, but the main limitation is the game itself. CS:GO servers run at 64Hz, private ones at 128Hz. Scrims or custom hosts like ESEA offer better gains, though I’m comfortable with 64Hz on a 144Hz display.