Issues with Game crashes and sudden system stops have occurred while playing since the PC was built two weeks ago!
Issues with Game crashes and sudden system stops have occurred while playing since the PC was built two weeks ago!
Description of Initial Issue:
Unstable performance while gaming since the PC was first assembled (approximately two weeks ago). The game frequently crashes or freezes, returning me to the desktop, and occasionally it abruptly shuts down or powers off completely (resembling a power cut). Most shutdowns or crashes occur with Overwatch 2, and they can happen at any moment—whether during loading, entering matches, or in the middle of gameplay.
Doom Eternal has experienced several crashes, but only one instance of an instant shutdown. Red Dead Redemption 2 has led to two shutdowns (once upon first launch and once mid-session). Cyberpunk has crashed just once, though my playtime was minimal.
In games like Doom, Red Dead, and Cyberpunk, I’ve managed to play for a few hours without interruptions. However, I haven’t been able to play Overwatch for more than one or two sessions at a time, even if I manage to complete them.
The only BIOS adjustment I made was enabling EXPO.
Troubleshooting Steps:
Performed a hard reset of the CMOS, re-downloaded Windows 11 to a newly formatted USB drive, and completed a full installation.
Removed and reinserted RAM and GPU. Conducted a visual inspection of the build (though I must admit, I’m not trying to sound overly confident—my role is to follow procedures and ensure components fit correctly). I was very careful during assembly, so human error seems unlikely, though I remain open to being proven wrong if it resolves my problem.
Applied an optional GPU driver update from AMD.
Conducted short stress tests on the OCCT CPU, GPU, and power system using a CPU, GPU, and power test tool, as well as Cinebench R23—no crashes were recorded.
Restarted the computer multiple times and monitored performance via Windows Performance Monitor. Continuously reviewed logs in the Windows Reliability tool and System Event Viewer.
System Specifications:
Device Type: Desktop
Graphics Card: RX 7800XT Gigabyte Gaming OC 16GB
Processor: Ryzen 5 7600X
Motherboard: ASRock B850M-X wifi
BIOS Version: 3.2 (latest available on ASRock support page)
Memory: Silicon Power DDR5 2x16GB 6000MT/s CL30 1.35v (PC5-48000)
Power Supply: Gigabyte UD750GM
Case: Antec Flux
Operating System & Version: Windows 11 Professional Edition Windows 11 Pro 24H2 26100.3775
GPU Drivers: Adrenalin 25.3.2 (optional; previously used Adrenalin 25.3.1 – WHQL recommended)
Chipset Drivers: AMD latest chipset Driver 7.02.13.148
Background Applications: None
That's not quite right, at least from a build perspective. However, the selection of components isn't the main concern here. If you chose this path, it seems unlikely you were considering the PSU: Given the background checks for PSUs, you'd find they generally offer only average quality, often described as low or even subpar due to Gigabyte's specifications. Additionally, the warranty period is just 5 years, which is quite short for a reliable power supply. Official details: https://www.gigabyte.com/Power-Supply/GP-UD750GM#kf Review links: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/gigab...0gm-750-w/ In summary: - Up to 2 years: poor reliability - 3 years: moderate reliability (compared to brands like Corsair or Be Quiet!) - 5 years: average reliability (e.g., Be Quiet! Straight Power 11, Seasonic G12, Corsair CX/CXF) - 7 years: decent reliability (e.g., Seasonic Core/Focus GM, Corsair TX/AX) - 10 years and above: strong reliability (e.g., Seasonic Focus GX/PX, Corsair RMx/HX/HXi/AXi) Aim for a PSU with at least a 10-year warranty. A 7-year warranty would be the minimum acceptable. (For example, my three PCs use Seasonic units. I own two PRIME TX-650 and one Focus PX-550. Full specifications and images are in my profile.) Most frequent problems during reboots or shutdowns: 1. Overheating of CPU/GPU, causing the system to shut down immediately. 2. Insufficient power delivery from the PSU to the GPU or unstable voltage for normal operation. First, check your CPU/GPU temperatures—both at idle and under load. If they're within normal ranges, it's likely the PSU is the issue. A reliable PSU can usually be confirmed by testing with a known-good unit. If you replace your PSU, make sure to do thorough research beforehand. Since the PSU supplies power to all components, it's crucial. That's why it's essential never to compromise on quality for a PSU. Also, avoid purchasing used units. For a 750W build, a 750W unit is sufficient. Here are top ATX 3.x options you can consider: https://hwbusters.com/best_picks/best-at...busters/3/ The Kernel Power event ID 41 often appears when a PC loses power suddenly. This is usually due to PSU problems, though sometimes it relates to motherboard VRM or even the main power supply in your home. A proper UPS can help with power fluctuations, but it won't resolve all issues.
I’m planning to collect some screenshots showing temperatures under various loads and will post them later. From what I understand, everything is running smoothly. I’m comfortable operating at full GPU and CPU usage without any overheating, and my fans stay within normal limits. When picking parts, I always considered cooling ease.
I also want to mention that shortly after starting RDR2, I experienced a BSOD with the message “Attempted execute of NoExecute Memory.” This is different from other crashes because this was the first one, not an abrupt shutdown. Later, RDR2 would also encounter problems where assets weren’t rendered correctly—just character models and clothing, with areas turning black. After restarting the PC, I’ve been able to play without issues for a couple of hours now.
I’ll send back the temperature readings shortly.
So I'm just starting out with all this, so please let me know if I'm making any mistakes. I noticed I didn't run the GPU tests for too long, but I think the 'switch test' would quickly point out PSU issues. I've also done the constant load test a few times now and the results have stayed consistent for a long time.
GPU temps are within normal. Actually quite good considering you have RX 7600XT and it peaks at 58C.
RX 7600XT usually hovers around 60-70C during load, depending which AIB model you have,
review:
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapph...se/38.html
Your CPU temps, however, are not normal. Your CPU is getting way too hot.
Under max load, R5 7600X with proper CPU cooler (Noctua NH-U14S), should see ~88C. On gaming loads, even less,
review:
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-r...0x/25.html
Yours, however, peaks at 95C, which is Tjmax for your chip,
specs:
https://www.amd.com/en/products/processo...7600x.html
So, what kind of CPU cooler you have? I don't see it listed above within PC specs.
Overheating CPU can cause all sorts of BSoD and other issues, including the random shut downs you're seeing.
Also, how many case fans you have? Their size? Their orientation (e.g front intake or front exhaust)? And case fan specs too.
The 5x stock fans that come with the PC case? Or have you replaced case fans?
Since clearly, something is wrong with CPU cooling. Else-ways, you won't see such high temps out of your chip.
I own a thermalright phantom spirit 120 SE with an Antec Flux case and stock case fans (it was nominated by GamersNexus as the case of the year for stock thermals). The airflow inside and out of the exhaust fans feels refreshing while gaming. Additionally, this is exactly how Zen4 CPUs function—they increase performance up to their maximum temperature and aim to run at that level during all-core tasks. Nonetheless, my CPU never approaches that temperature; in fact, I haven’t seen it reach close to 80°C. You can find a reference to this in Linus’s discussion of AMD’s Zen4 thermal management as well as a direct quote from AMD itself.
Yes, but you'll get thermal throttle and reduced performance when your chip is close to/at Tjmax.
The two sources you linked, did showcase much beefier CPUs to operate at Tjmax, while Linuses video even showcased thermal throttle.
But when it comes to R5 7600X, it should not reach Tjmax on synthetic load.
At 7:18 here (essentially same temps as in TechPowerUP review i linked);
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGuFq3jm9hM&t=437s
But your Cinebench run showed your chip at Tjmax (peak temp in HWinfo64).
That's current king of air coolers and you should have below 90C temps during CPU bench.
Just to confirm if HWinfo64 doesn't report temps wrong, set your CPU cooler fans and all case fans at 100% and run the bench again with HWinfo64 open (might even want to start it's Logging feature). It will be noisy, but it's only for the duration of testing.
If the peak temps drop from 95C, then we at least know that CPU cooling is adequate. But it could then mean that you're running your fans (including CPU cooler fans) too slowly (most likely to reduce noise).
You could even try to game on fans 100% to see, if it makes a difference (do you still experience crashes/reboots or not).
Since when we can figure out what the culprit is (either thermals or PSU), you may not need to spend money to replace PSU. Could be very well that all you need, is more aggressive fan profile for better CPU cooling. (Or adding additional fans as top exhaust.)
GN tests PC cases with stock fans and since yours comes with 5x fans pre-installed, it has easy path to the top of the charts. Especially when competing cases have 2-3 pre-installed fans. Now, if all PC cases tested would be tested by populating all possible fan mounts, it would be completely different story.
Speaking of it, a comparison;
Spoiler:
Two pictures (click here to view)
What you think, which of the two has better thermals;
1. Corsair 760T (white) with stock fans;
* 2x 140mm front intake Corsair AF140L white LED fans
* 1x 140mm rear exhaust Corsair AF140L fan
or
2. Corsair 760T (black) with user replaced fans;
* 2x 140mm front intake Corsair ML140 Pro red LED fans
* 1x 120mm bottom intake Corsair ML120 Pro red LED fan
* 1x 140mm rear exhaust Corsair ML140 Pro red LED fan
* 3x 140mm top exhaust NZXT AER140 RGB fans
And how much a difference you think there is between the stock and upgraded one?
This claim about the Zen4 architecture being built for maximum temperature seems questionable. It appears AMD may have encountered thermal challenges with their design, attempting to manage public perception through this "by design" statement. The CPU automatically throttles when it hits its maximum temperature, meaning it would consistently underperform if constantly operating at that level. In your YouTube video, only the 7950x model reaches Tjmax, while the 7600x never achieves it with any cooling solution. However, this issue becomes less significant if you're not operating near Tjmax during gameplay or system crashes. Based on my experience, RAM instability is often the primary concern. For example, when running a 6000 MT/s CL30 kit on an AM5 board at 1.35 V, try playing without enabling Expo. If you do, increase the voltage to 1.4 V and see if the crashes persist. You might also consider running the AIDA64 stress test with memory included—if the test completes without errors for 15-20 minutes, the system is likely stable.
It's not only AMD but Intel too, since 12th gen. From 12th gen, Intel top-end chips operated in 90C area, review: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel...en/21.html While starting from 13th gen, the 95C/100C operating temp became the new "norm", review: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel...0k/23.html And when chip reaches Tjmax on stock clocks, it means there's 0 OC headroom. Hence why today, CPU OC is dead. Back in the old days, e.g Intel 6th gen, i7-6700K peaked at 73C with stock clocks (Tjmax 100C), giving plenty of OC headroom, review: But what we see today, all comes down to where CPU makers have to release better and better performing CPUs (compared to previous gen), while the R&D in efficiency is lacking way behind. Latest top-end chips are already operating at Tjmax and ceiling is hit. Now, CPU makes have to invest into efficiency, since there is no way to increase performance. That, actually, Intel has begun to do, with their latest Core Ultra 200 series. Latest chips are more power efficient but since there's almost no performance uplift over previous (14th gen), almost no-one is buying the latest Intel chips. Especially since those cost considerably more than previous gen. And current AMD offering (Ryzen 9000-series) is both cheaper and at times, better performing as well. Though times for CPU makers currently. In terms of RAM, download and run memtest86, link: https://www.memtest86.com/ Guide to install and use it: https://www.memtest86.com/tech_creating-window.html 1 full pass (all 15 tests) is bare minimum. 2 full passes are better while 4 full passes is considered acceptable. Since it takes a while, best to let it run overnight. 1x 8GB one full pass takes ~1h. 2x 8GB ~2.5h. So, ~5h for your 2x 16GB per 1 pass. Or ~20h for 4 full passes. If there are no errors - RAM is sound.