Issue with connecting networks (router placed between two routers) )
Issue with connecting networks (router placed between two routers) )
Hello new acquaintances, this is my first message and just joined. I’m dealing with a network setup issue and honestly can’t figure out how to fix it. I’m staying in a rental room, and the landlord supplies the internet. My Mac Book is having trouble connecting to the AP because it’s too far away, even though my PC sees the AP. I tried using an old Asus RT-AC87U, but it’s an open guest network with a sign-in portal—can’t access the web GUI from there.
Now I’m thinking about using a CAT5 cable in the room, which gives a connection on my PC but my PC rejects it, saying the Ethernet config is wrong. Even after using Windows Resolver and checking my network knowledge, it still doesn’t work. I’m guessing if I can make the RT-AC87U a subnet, it might help with my Wi-Fi devices and let me run my PC via a TP-cable.
My problem is that my landlord’s part of the network works fine, but my connection behind them isn’t. I’m getting frustrated because I don’t know what to do anymore. Do anyone have any ideas or experience with this?
I don’t need an AP. I’d like to connect the two networks so I can use my Asus RT-AC87U for personal use without sharing it with others. I want both wired and wireless options.
You seem to lack understanding of networks. I prefer using what I already have and don’t need any purchases. No DHCP issues should arise if there are separate IP ranges. For example, if Network 1 uses 192.168.1.X and Network 2 uses 192.168.2.X, they won’t interfere with each other’s IP ranges. If you’re unsure about this, check the link provided: https://www.linksys.com/ca/support-artic...Num=132275
Don't worry about me, I know more than you think. What I meant is that you haven’t read the first and second posts, and I’m trying to clarify what I’m asking for help with. You’re just guessing and suggesting purchases, which isn’t really useful. Sorry about that.
If you turn off NAT and your landlord's equipment lacks a static route to direct traffic to the 192.168.2.x subnet through the 192.168.1.x IP, you won't be able to connect. Enabling NAT with a 192.168.1.x IP on your WAN port could cause double NAT issues, though you should still be able to reach the network generally—some services might still face problems.
I should ask my landlord to allow my router a fixed route so it functions properly. Thanks for the clarification and the assistance in getting my mind clear. Appreciate your support so far.