F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Issue with AMD Precision Boost performance in gaming environments.

Issue with AMD Precision Boost performance in gaming environments.

Issue with AMD Precision Boost performance in gaming environments.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
TheHighOreo
Junior Member
12
07-15-2016, 10:16 AM
#1
I looked through online resources for others experiencing the same issue, but found nothing. It appears the Precision Boost feature isn't functioning in games, even though it works in BIOS and Ryzen Master. When I run Cinbench R20, it successfully boosts to 4.5 GHz. This is unusual since it typically causes a significant performance drop. In my setup, the CPU reaches a maximum of 2.1GHz during games, and the 240mm AIO doesn't seem to cause thermal problems. Any suggestions or insights would be greatly appreciated!
T
TheHighOreo
07-15-2016, 10:16 AM #1

I looked through online resources for others experiencing the same issue, but found nothing. It appears the Precision Boost feature isn't functioning in games, even though it works in BIOS and Ryzen Master. When I run Cinbench R20, it successfully boosts to 4.5 GHz. This is unusual since it typically causes a significant performance drop. In my setup, the CPU reaches a maximum of 2.1GHz during games, and the 240mm AIO doesn't seem to cause thermal problems. Any suggestions or insights would be greatly appreciated!

R
RoyalUmbreon
Member
162
07-15-2016, 02:00 PM
#2
When using a GPU limit, the CPU won't require excessive boosts. Monitor both GPU and CPU usage per thread during gameplay, along with the specific software you're using to check CPU frequency.
R
RoyalUmbreon
07-15-2016, 02:00 PM #2

When using a GPU limit, the CPU won't require excessive boosts. Monitor both GPU and CPU usage per thread during gameplay, along with the specific software you're using to check CPU frequency.

H
Hazardz4
Junior Member
12
07-16-2016, 08:17 PM
#3
I'm tracking performance data using Radeon Software. Right now I'm playing Just Cause 3. With a 2GHz CPU the GPU usage stays under 70%, which shouldn't be an issue. Even after manually increasing the CPU frequency to 4.5GHz, the GPU remains around 92-95% with full settings on 1080p. At 2GHz the CPU usage never exceeds 15%, rising to about 40% when overclocked to 4.5GHz. The GPU temperature is approximately 60°C.
H
Hazardz4
07-16-2016, 08:17 PM #3

I'm tracking performance data using Radeon Software. Right now I'm playing Just Cause 3. With a 2GHz CPU the GPU usage stays under 70%, which shouldn't be an issue. Even after manually increasing the CPU frequency to 4.5GHz, the GPU remains around 92-95% with full settings on 1080p. At 2GHz the CPU usage never exceeds 15%, rising to about 40% when overclocked to 4.5GHz. The GPU temperature is approximately 60°C.

T
ThePerkinrex
Junior Member
6
07-22-2016, 05:07 AM
#4
In gaming it doesn't matter what you use overall, just per core. Check CPU speeds with tools like Ryzen Master or HW Monitor. Radeon Software's monitoring has many issues that haven't been fixed yet.
T
ThePerkinrex
07-22-2016, 05:07 AM #4

In gaming it doesn't matter what you use overall, just per core. Check CPU speeds with tools like Ryzen Master or HW Monitor. Radeon Software's monitoring has many issues that haven't been fixed yet.

Y
yolominer5
Member
71
07-22-2016, 08:18 AM
#5
You're right, the issue isn't about usage on either side. It turns out the Precision Boost doesn't function properly in games, and I've tested many titles without success. It seems to activate only when the CPU reaches a specific load level, as seen in benchmarks like Cinebench or stress tests.
Y
yolominer5
07-22-2016, 08:18 AM #5

You're right, the issue isn't about usage on either side. It turns out the Precision Boost doesn't function properly in games, and I've tested many titles without success. It seems to activate only when the CPU reaches a specific load level, as seen in benchmarks like Cinebench or stress tests.

V
Veggeta_Gaymer
Junior Member
27
07-22-2016, 10:08 AM
#6
Usage patterns aren't the only factor. Your 8Core 16Thread CPU1 thread operating at full capacity accounts for just 6.25% of total load, making it the limiting element here. The overall figure doesn't capture the full picture.
V
Veggeta_Gaymer
07-22-2016, 10:08 AM #6

Usage patterns aren't the only factor. Your 8Core 16Thread CPU1 thread operating at full capacity accounts for just 6.25% of total load, making it the limiting element here. The overall figure doesn't capture the full picture.

C
cmart592
Member
203
07-24-2016, 09:12 AM
#7
HW keeps track of the top core usage reaching 80% peak. This doesn’t seem to solve the issue, does it? When the CPU runs at full capacity across all 8 cores and 16 threads, it reaches 4.5 GHz. If it’s not at 100%, it won’t boost further.
C
cmart592
07-24-2016, 09:12 AM #7

HW keeps track of the top core usage reaching 80% peak. This doesn’t seem to solve the issue, does it? When the CPU runs at full capacity across all 8 cores and 16 threads, it reaches 4.5 GHz. If it’s not at 100%, it won’t boost further.

E
echigo3210
Member
180
07-24-2016, 09:31 AM
#8
The question refers to a clock located within a central component, but no specific context or object was mentioned.
E
echigo3210
07-24-2016, 09:31 AM #8

The question refers to a clock located within a central component, but no specific context or object was mentioned.

P
puppydemon20
Member
165
07-24-2016, 11:02 AM
#9
In the range of 2 to 2.2GHz
P
puppydemon20
07-24-2016, 11:02 AM #9

In the range of 2 to 2.2GHz

A
ApeBarrel
Member
214
07-28-2016, 02:32 PM
#10
Screenshot shows HW monitor display. Maximum reached 87.5% on one core during game launch. Clock readings remain consistent regardless of actions.
A
ApeBarrel
07-28-2016, 02:32 PM #10

Screenshot shows HW monitor display. Maximum reached 87.5% on one core during game launch. Clock readings remain consistent regardless of actions.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next