F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Is I9 9900k worth it?

Is I9 9900k worth it?

Is I9 9900k worth it?

K
kaipod
Junior Member
43
05-24-2018, 01:49 AM
#1
Hello everyone, here’s what I gathered about your thoughts on this offer. I noticed Newegg is running the i9 for $320, which seems like a solid deal. Compared to my z370, which can handle it after a BIOS update, I’m not aiming to overclock it or replace the board and CPU.
K
kaipod
05-24-2018, 01:49 AM #1

Hello everyone, here’s what I gathered about your thoughts on this offer. I noticed Newegg is running the i9 for $320, which seems like a solid deal. Compared to my z370, which can handle it after a BIOS update, I’m not aiming to overclock it or replace the board and CPU.

M
MilaMaya
Junior Member
49
05-24-2018, 05:26 AM
#2
I own a unit that performs well. Many remain stable at 5ghz across all cores. This model isn’t expected to be swapped anytime soon. The components and specifications are detailed below. Check out this engaging video.
M
MilaMaya
05-24-2018, 05:26 AM #2

I own a unit that performs well. Many remain stable at 5ghz across all cores. This model isn’t expected to be swapped anytime soon. The components and specifications are detailed below. Check out this engaging video.

L
L0NExW0LF666
Junior Member
3
05-24-2018, 01:54 PM
#3
I saw the same video last week and thought its points were engaging and convincing, with a few caveats. He focuses on the 8700k with six cores released three years ago, comparing it to the newer 5600x which also has six cores. However, he overlooks details like thread counts—one model has just six threads while another has twelve—and doesn't mention improvements in IPC, architecture, or cooling efficiency. For current $300 CPUs, the 9900k seems a strong choice. While single-thread speed is lower than the 5600x, it still outperforms it in many scenarios. I would have chosen that option before, but I already had a b550 board.
L
L0NExW0LF666
05-24-2018, 01:54 PM #3

I saw the same video last week and thought its points were engaging and convincing, with a few caveats. He focuses on the 8700k with six cores released three years ago, comparing it to the newer 5600x which also has six cores. However, he overlooks details like thread counts—one model has just six threads while another has twelve—and doesn't mention improvements in IPC, architecture, or cooling efficiency. For current $300 CPUs, the 9900k seems a strong choice. While single-thread speed is lower than the 5600x, it still outperforms it in many scenarios. I would have chosen that option before, but I already had a b550 board.

L
Lucarionite18
Junior Member
44
06-03-2018, 06:55 AM
#4
I own six, eight, and ten core CPUs making comparisons straightforward. The six-core unit works well now but recent purchases have exceeded that number. All my titles are moving from the six-core Intel processor to the ten-core one because performance improves. My i9-9900K was part of a video rendering/editing setup and will probably return to it once paired with an RTX graphics card. I've only played games on it, but they run just as smoothly as on systems with six cores when limited to that limit. For gaming and work tasks it offers solid value at $330.
L
Lucarionite18
06-03-2018, 06:55 AM #4

I own six, eight, and ten core CPUs making comparisons straightforward. The six-core unit works well now but recent purchases have exceeded that number. All my titles are moving from the six-core Intel processor to the ten-core one because performance improves. My i9-9900K was part of a video rendering/editing setup and will probably return to it once paired with an RTX graphics card. I've only played games on it, but they run just as smoothly as on systems with six cores when limited to that limit. For gaming and work tasks it offers solid value at $330.