F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Internet world

Internet world

Internet world

U
Ulster_Son
Member
69
12-20-2016, 10:56 PM
#1
Have you contacted your ISP to check if they can upgrade the gear? It’s likely both ends need work and it could impact other users too. Also, ask about any alignment problems or other suggestions they have.
U
Ulster_Son
12-20-2016, 10:56 PM #1

Have you contacted your ISP to check if they can upgrade the gear? It’s likely both ends need work and it could impact other users too. Also, ask about any alignment problems or other suggestions they have.

I
ItzCh3nTi_YT
Member
96
12-21-2016, 12:41 AM
#2
They have plans to refresh their tower in seven years, which is why I'm searching for a solution.
I
ItzCh3nTi_YT
12-21-2016, 12:41 AM #2

They have plans to refresh their tower in seven years, which is why I'm searching for a solution.

G
190
01-10-2017, 12:29 AM
#3
If you have solid 4G LTE service nearby, consider using that connection. For example, Ubifi+MoFi with a good Yagi antenna can deliver speeds around 50 Mbps or higher, depending on your location.
G
gustavbengters
01-10-2017, 12:29 AM #3

If you have solid 4G LTE service nearby, consider using that connection. For example, Ubifi+MoFi with a good Yagi antenna can deliver speeds around 50 Mbps or higher, depending on your location.

B
Bqlek_
Junior Member
18
01-10-2017, 11:41 AM
#4
Never assume they’ll show up. 4G LTE is likely your top choice soon, while 5G will arrive eventually. Consider checking a WISP, since one might be nearby. Other options are slow DSL in certain areas, satellite with high latency, and sometimes usage limits or monthly caps.
B
Bqlek_
01-10-2017, 11:41 AM #4

Never assume they’ll show up. 4G LTE is likely your top choice soon, while 5G will arrive eventually. Consider checking a WISP, since one might be nearby. Other options are slow DSL in certain areas, satellite with high latency, and sometimes usage limits or monthly caps.

N
noodleguy2004
Member
58
01-10-2017, 04:29 PM
#5
The alternative choice, though still several years away, will join a range of low-altitude satellite offerings such as SpaceX Starlink, OneWeb, TeleSat, and Amazon’s Project Kuiper. Unlike traditional satellite internet, these new systems use regular satellites positioned in lower orbits, allowing them to move swiftly across the sky. This results in much faster connections—latencies under 50ms compared to the usual ~500ms of geostationary satellites.
N
noodleguy2004
01-10-2017, 04:29 PM #5

The alternative choice, though still several years away, will join a range of low-altitude satellite offerings such as SpaceX Starlink, OneWeb, TeleSat, and Amazon’s Project Kuiper. Unlike traditional satellite internet, these new systems use regular satellites positioned in lower orbits, allowing them to move swiftly across the sky. This results in much faster connections—latencies under 50ms compared to the usual ~500ms of geostationary satellites.