F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Intel Vs. Intel

Intel Vs. Intel

Intel Vs. Intel

H
HDellrON
Senior Member
257
07-18-2021, 04:57 PM
#1
I've been struggling with my head against the wall for quite some time now. Because I'm not as knowledgeable about computer or PC matters as I should be, I've been trying to learn on my own over the past two years. It's been a costly experience, hehe. I'm asking a question on a high-tech forum as a beginner, and honestly, it feels like wasting money on these self-made lessons. I'm still confused about how different tech brands fit together and what actually works well with each other. So I'm going to try to focus on the basics as much as possible. (I'm currently looking into this latest topic). Intel Core i9 11900k versus Intel Xeon W-1370P. From what I understand, whenever I hear "Intel Xeon," I imagine a processor that could last a lifetime. Maybe something with the "Xeon" label on it, still working after decades of use. In contrast, a regular Core CPU would probably fail after just a couple of years. Personally, my take is still unclear. Maybe marketing is playing a big role here. Could it be that Intel just releases similar-looking CPUs with slight differences, giving the impression of a big difference? Like comparing the i9 11900k and the W-1370P? Even a few hertz of performance here and there, and the Xeon seems capable. Is that really all there is? Or am I missing a bigger picture? Would appreciate some opinions on this. Also, when comparing products like this, I think it's best to focus on the actual features and capabilities first. The money part comes later, hehe. :-)
H
HDellrON
07-18-2021, 04:57 PM #1

I've been struggling with my head against the wall for quite some time now. Because I'm not as knowledgeable about computer or PC matters as I should be, I've been trying to learn on my own over the past two years. It's been a costly experience, hehe. I'm asking a question on a high-tech forum as a beginner, and honestly, it feels like wasting money on these self-made lessons. I'm still confused about how different tech brands fit together and what actually works well with each other. So I'm going to try to focus on the basics as much as possible. (I'm currently looking into this latest topic). Intel Core i9 11900k versus Intel Xeon W-1370P. From what I understand, whenever I hear "Intel Xeon," I imagine a processor that could last a lifetime. Maybe something with the "Xeon" label on it, still working after decades of use. In contrast, a regular Core CPU would probably fail after just a couple of years. Personally, my take is still unclear. Maybe marketing is playing a big role here. Could it be that Intel just releases similar-looking CPUs with slight differences, giving the impression of a big difference? Like comparing the i9 11900k and the W-1370P? Even a few hertz of performance here and there, and the Xeon seems capable. Is that really all there is? Or am I missing a bigger picture? Would appreciate some opinions on this. Also, when comparing products like this, I think it's best to focus on the actual features and capabilities first. The money part comes later, hehe. :-)

D
DropedPing
Junior Member
30
07-18-2021, 10:29 PM
#2
It depends on the details of what you're aiming for. 11900k might have been one of the least desirable CPUs ever made. The only two generations I could mention as generally worse were the 9th and 7th. The 9th was criticized for dropping hyperthreading, while the 7th fell into complacency. XEONS tend to be more suited for servers than regular home computers. They come with more "official" drivers to ensure reliability, since downtime can lead to significant costs. Mainstream desktop CPUs are built for performance and gaming, along with other features marketers want to highlight.
D
DropedPing
07-18-2021, 10:29 PM #2

It depends on the details of what you're aiming for. 11900k might have been one of the least desirable CPUs ever made. The only two generations I could mention as generally worse were the 9th and 7th. The 9th was criticized for dropping hyperthreading, while the 7th fell into complacency. XEONS tend to be more suited for servers than regular home computers. They come with more "official" drivers to ensure reliability, since downtime can lead to significant costs. Mainstream desktop CPUs are built for performance and gaming, along with other features marketers want to highlight.

A
AzoTax
Member
209
07-22-2021, 03:14 PM
#3
It's a workstation that operates around the clock, handling crypto mining for me. I also run Minecraft servers there, which we use at work. It's mostly for team meetings, emails, and ordering supplies—nothing too complex. I was looking for something reliable that gives me a sense of calm, knowing it won't freeze up. That's when I remembered the Xeon Family.
A
AzoTax
07-22-2021, 03:14 PM #3

It's a workstation that operates around the clock, handling crypto mining for me. I also run Minecraft servers there, which we use at work. It's mostly for team meetings, emails, and ordering supplies—nothing too complex. I was looking for something reliable that gives me a sense of calm, knowing it won't freeze up. That's when I remembered the Xeon Family.

T
228
07-24-2021, 02:07 AM
#4
But consider it differently, I’m a plumber by day. No matter what you need a copper tube for, if you ask me, the main difference between a 12mm and a 15mm tube is clear. With about 4 Bar pressure, a 12mm tube suits 0.2 l/s for regular sinks like bathrooms, while a 15mm is better for 0.4 l/s in larger basins. That’s the practical distinction. Now, regarding your question about differences in production—there haven’t been any major material changes in CPU manufacturing. The core differences lie more in design and performance specs than in raw materials. As for longevity, it depends on usage and environment, not just the size of the core.
T
Thegamingnerds
07-24-2021, 02:07 AM #4

But consider it differently, I’m a plumber by day. No matter what you need a copper tube for, if you ask me, the main difference between a 12mm and a 15mm tube is clear. With about 4 Bar pressure, a 12mm tube suits 0.2 l/s for regular sinks like bathrooms, while a 15mm is better for 0.4 l/s in larger basins. That’s the practical distinction. Now, regarding your question about differences in production—there haven’t been any major material changes in CPU manufacturing. The core differences lie more in design and performance specs than in raw materials. As for longevity, it depends on usage and environment, not just the size of the core.