F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Intel

Intel

Intel

S
sebasdoce
Member
245
02-06-2016, 05:11 AM
#1
Intel CPUs tend to outperform AMD in gaming due to better performance and efficiency. Fast memory is recommended for Ryzen CPUs to enhance multitasking and game responsiveness.
S
sebasdoce
02-06-2016, 05:11 AM #1

Intel CPUs tend to outperform AMD in gaming due to better performance and efficiency. Fast memory is recommended for Ryzen CPUs to enhance multitasking and game responsiveness.

I
Ice3Boy
Member
230
02-09-2016, 09:01 PM
#2
Intel processors typically offer better single-core speed, whereas AMD models usually provide more threads. Games don’t run all available threads, so fewer threads aren’t a major issue, though quicker cores still matter. This is just a broad idea and doesn’t apply to every Intel versus every AMD CPU. The definition of 'fast' varies, but around 3000Mhz at CL15 is the lowest acceptable, while 3200Mhz at CL14 or 3600Mhz at CL16 are considered top choices.
I
Ice3Boy
02-09-2016, 09:01 PM #2

Intel processors typically offer better single-core speed, whereas AMD models usually provide more threads. Games don’t run all available threads, so fewer threads aren’t a major issue, though quicker cores still matter. This is just a broad idea and doesn’t apply to every Intel versus every AMD CPU. The definition of 'fast' varies, but around 3000Mhz at CL15 is the lowest acceptable, while 3200Mhz at CL14 or 3600Mhz at CL16 are considered top choices.

S
SxBALLER
Member
51
02-10-2016, 01:04 AM
#3
They operate at greater speeds, enhancing stability in the center, which is essential for most challenges.
S
SxBALLER
02-10-2016, 01:04 AM #3

They operate at greater speeds, enhancing stability in the center, which is essential for most challenges.

P
Patrions_
Member
216
02-10-2016, 01:47 AM
#4
For every clock, IPC AMD would come out ahead. Intel only edges out AMD because of their significantly faster clock rates. Single-threaded AMD performs well or even surpasses them in many benchmarks, while multithreaded AMD struggles compared to Intel. For a 3700x processor, the optimal speeds for top performance are around 3600mhz due to Fclock, or the rates at which the Infinity Fabric communicates as it matches memory clock speeds up to 3600mhz.
P
Patrions_
02-10-2016, 01:47 AM #4

For every clock, IPC AMD would come out ahead. Intel only edges out AMD because of their significantly faster clock rates. Single-threaded AMD performs well or even surpasses them in many benchmarks, while multithreaded AMD struggles compared to Intel. For a 3700x processor, the optimal speeds for top performance are around 3600mhz due to Fclock, or the rates at which the Infinity Fabric communicates as it matches memory clock speeds up to 3600mhz.

B
bobjeb
Junior Member
6
02-10-2016, 04:30 PM
#5
Checking if G.Skill 4x8 3600Mhz CL19 needs adjustment before purchase.
B
bobjeb
02-10-2016, 04:30 PM #5

Checking if G.Skill 4x8 3600Mhz CL19 needs adjustment before purchase.

S
Strikerxs2
Member
168
02-10-2016, 07:07 PM
#6
It depends One of the reasons is simply it can boost higher because it only has one ccx allowing it to not have as much latency as AMD Yea It has multiple ccxs which introduces latency and for the interconnect to work faster for it to allow the ccxs to communicate faster it needs fast ram That's the super basic explanation but it should do the job
S
Strikerxs2
02-10-2016, 07:07 PM #6

It depends One of the reasons is simply it can boost higher because it only has one ccx allowing it to not have as much latency as AMD Yea It has multiple ccxs which introduces latency and for the interconnect to work faster for it to allow the ccxs to communicate faster it needs fast ram That's the super basic explanation but it should do the job

H
huuskyjerk
Member
170
02-11-2016, 04:02 AM
#7
It's a good point.
H
huuskyjerk
02-11-2016, 04:02 AM #7

It's a good point.

N
117
02-11-2016, 08:38 AM
#8
Sure, that should be fine. If you locate a bit cheaper CAS latency memory, it might be worth looking into. It provides a slight performance improvement.
N
NotLate4Dinner
02-11-2016, 08:38 AM #8

Sure, that should be fine. If you locate a bit cheaper CAS latency memory, it might be worth looking into. It provides a slight performance improvement.