F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Inquiry about this choice in my BIOS concerning overclocking.

Inquiry about this choice in my BIOS concerning overclocking.

Inquiry about this choice in my BIOS concerning overclocking.

B
b0b1sdab0mb
Junior Member
10
08-02-2016, 02:04 PM
#1
Hi everyone. I'm trying to understand a setting in the BIOS for my N68SB+ motherboard with an AMD Phenom II X4 850 CPU. The option mentions overclocking, but I'm confused about the numbers. My CPU is already running at 3.3Ghz, so why is it listed as 200Mhz? And what does the max frequency of 600 mean? Could someone explain this better? Thanks.
B
b0b1sdab0mb
08-02-2016, 02:04 PM #1

Hi everyone. I'm trying to understand a setting in the BIOS for my N68SB+ motherboard with an AMD Phenom II X4 850 CPU. The option mentions overclocking, but I'm confused about the numbers. My CPU is already running at 3.3Ghz, so why is it listed as 200Mhz? And what does the max frequency of 600 mean? Could someone explain this better? Thanks.

O
OrangePotatos
Member
52
08-02-2016, 08:06 PM
#2
I believe the front side bus speed might be the issue. Using a multiplier would be better if possible. I’m not sure about 100%, but increasing the front side bus could help your RAM run faster, making your ports function properly. The calculation is straightforward: 200 MHz FSB multiplied by a multiplier equals CPU clock speed. In simple terms, you’re likely aiming for a 16.5 multiplier. So, for example, 200mhz FSB x 16.5 gives you around 3300MHz. If you can boost the front side bus, you might get more performance from your CPU. However, your system seems a bit outdated—those conditions were common between 2009 and 2011. It might be worth thinking about an upgrade.
O
OrangePotatos
08-02-2016, 08:06 PM #2

I believe the front side bus speed might be the issue. Using a multiplier would be better if possible. I’m not sure about 100%, but increasing the front side bus could help your RAM run faster, making your ports function properly. The calculation is straightforward: 200 MHz FSB multiplied by a multiplier equals CPU clock speed. In simple terms, you’re likely aiming for a 16.5 multiplier. So, for example, 200mhz FSB x 16.5 gives you around 3300MHz. If you can boost the front side bus, you might get more performance from your CPU. However, your system seems a bit outdated—those conditions were common between 2009 and 2011. It might be worth thinking about an upgrade.

B
Blackbelt244
Junior Member
45
08-03-2016, 02:34 AM
#3
I believe the front side bus speed might be the issue. Using a multiplier would be better if possible. I’m not sure about 100%, but increasing the front side bus could help your RAM run faster, making your ports function properly. The calculation is straightforward: 200 MHz FSB multiplied by a multiplier equals CPU clock speed. In simple terms, you’re likely aiming for a 16.5 multiplier. So, for example, 200mhz FSB x 16.5 gives you around 3300MHz. If you can boost the front side bus, you might get more performance from your CPU. However, your system seems a bit outdated—those conditions were common between 2009 and 2011. It might be worth thinking about an upgrade.
B
Blackbelt244
08-03-2016, 02:34 AM #3

I believe the front side bus speed might be the issue. Using a multiplier would be better if possible. I’m not sure about 100%, but increasing the front side bus could help your RAM run faster, making your ports function properly. The calculation is straightforward: 200 MHz FSB multiplied by a multiplier equals CPU clock speed. In simple terms, you’re likely aiming for a 16.5 multiplier. So, for example, 200mhz FSB x 16.5 gives you around 3300MHz. If you can boost the front side bus, you might get more performance from your CPU. However, your system seems a bit outdated—those conditions were common between 2009 and 2011. It might be worth thinking about an upgrade.

P
pinkyperky33
Member
191
08-10-2016, 07:47 AM
#4
I truly believe upgrading has always been something I wanted for a long time. But being in Argentina makes everything seem extremely expensive, and with our incomes getting smaller every day, it feels like a real challenge. It’s not really a chance I’m hoping for.
P
pinkyperky33
08-10-2016, 07:47 AM #4

I truly believe upgrading has always been something I wanted for a long time. But being in Argentina makes everything seem extremely expensive, and with our incomes getting smaller every day, it feels like a real challenge. It’s not really a chance I’m hoping for.

G
GABBE_M
Junior Member
33
08-10-2016, 08:12 AM
#5
To enhance Ohio_Buckeye's reply further...
The multiplier boost might not work since your chip could be restricted by its multiplier setting (I don't have the exact model). For AMD, for example, they released Phenom II versions in Black Edition that support multiplier overclocking, while standard models can't. If you lack a BE Phenom II, FSB overclocking is possible but proceed with care. This method can stress memory and PCIe connections simultaneously, potentially causing GPU instability or even damaging your hard drive if not managed properly.

If CPU-based multiplier adjustments aren't feasible and you're considering FSB tweaks, focus on lowering memory and PCIe multipliers to stabilize performance. Achieving this balance is delicate, as excessive overclocking of data buses can lead to data corruption.
G
GABBE_M
08-10-2016, 08:12 AM #5

To enhance Ohio_Buckeye's reply further...
The multiplier boost might not work since your chip could be restricted by its multiplier setting (I don't have the exact model). For AMD, for example, they released Phenom II versions in Black Edition that support multiplier overclocking, while standard models can't. If you lack a BE Phenom II, FSB overclocking is possible but proceed with care. This method can stress memory and PCIe connections simultaneously, potentially causing GPU instability or even damaging your hard drive if not managed properly.

If CPU-based multiplier adjustments aren't feasible and you're considering FSB tweaks, focus on lowering memory and PCIe multipliers to stabilize performance. Achieving this balance is delicate, as excessive overclocking of data buses can lead to data corruption.