F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Increase performance by pushing your CPU to its maximum capacity (currently attempting to overclock a Ryzen 3 1200).

Increase performance by pushing your CPU to its maximum capacity (currently attempting to overclock a Ryzen 3 1200).

Increase performance by pushing your CPU to its maximum capacity (currently attempting to overclock a Ryzen 3 1200).

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
J
JeroScuach
Member
63
03-03-2016, 07:31 AM
#1
I'm new to overclocking but managed a solid performance boost. My Ryzen 3 1200 reached 3.5Ghz at stock settings in Ryzen Master with a base voltage of 1,187.5V OC. I pushed it up to 4Ghz at 1,875V and it stayed stable. At 4.2Ghz it blacked out briefly after the benchmark, but at 4.1Ghz it was also stable with the same voltage. I lowered the clock to 4,175Ghz and considered going higher to 1,325V.
J
JeroScuach
03-03-2016, 07:31 AM #1

I'm new to overclocking but managed a solid performance boost. My Ryzen 3 1200 reached 3.5Ghz at stock settings in Ryzen Master with a base voltage of 1,187.5V OC. I pushed it up to 4Ghz at 1,875V and it stayed stable. At 4.2Ghz it blacked out briefly after the benchmark, but at 4.1Ghz it was also stable with the same voltage. I lowered the clock to 4,175Ghz and considered going higher to 1,325V.

W
Winner
Member
242
03-03-2016, 04:47 PM
#2
Yes, it appears to be a typo.
W
Winner
03-03-2016, 04:47 PM #2

Yes, it appears to be a typo.

C
ChickenPhoYou
Posting Freak
850
03-03-2016, 05:31 PM
#3
In my setup stable means running Cinebench R23 for 30 minutes without issues, then using the PC for gaming later that day—some users put extra load on the CPU. I tried a short session of Warzone, followed by about an hour of Apex Legends and some League of Legends, all while keeping the system stable.
C
ChickenPhoYou
03-03-2016, 05:31 PM #3

In my setup stable means running Cinebench R23 for 30 minutes without issues, then using the PC for gaming later that day—some users put extra load on the CPU. I tried a short session of Warzone, followed by about an hour of Apex Legends and some League of Legends, all while keeping the system stable.

A
Azteka63
Member
96
03-03-2016, 06:19 PM
#4
Based on the rest of the post, it looks like the target is around 1.18 GHz. I plan to set it to 1.3 GHz, aim for 3.8 GHz, and stop there. I believe 4 GHz isn't practical for first-generation lower-end components.
A
Azteka63
03-03-2016, 06:19 PM #4

Based on the rest of the post, it looks like the target is around 1.18 GHz. I plan to set it to 1.3 GHz, aim for 3.8 GHz, and stop there. I believe 4 GHz isn't practical for first-generation lower-end components.

S
SoulRawr
Member
191
03-06-2016, 06:54 PM
#5
They’re asking about achieving 3.8GHz performance despite a CPU’s 4GHz capability. Increasing voltage can affect timing precision, not just clock speed.
S
SoulRawr
03-06-2016, 06:54 PM #5

They’re asking about achieving 3.8GHz performance despite a CPU’s 4GHz capability. Increasing voltage can affect timing precision, not just clock speed.

L
loro2705
Junior Member
2
03-08-2016, 08:24 AM
#6
Early generations generally reach their limits around 4-4.1ghz with the best recordings. Mid-range chips tend to be those that didn’t make it past the top end, meaning lower tiers mean less chance of hitting higher overclocks. That’s why a Ryzen 3 1200 at 3.8ghz feels quite sensible.
L
loro2705
03-08-2016, 08:24 AM #6

Early generations generally reach their limits around 4-4.1ghz with the best recordings. Mid-range chips tend to be those that didn’t make it past the top end, meaning lower tiers mean less chance of hitting higher overclocks. That’s why a Ryzen 3 1200 at 3.8ghz feels quite sensible.

Z
zeliotL
Member
211
03-08-2016, 09:30 AM
#7
You should avoid applying 1.325V to that setup once more and stop if it causes a black screen.
Z
zeliotL
03-08-2016, 09:30 AM #7

You should avoid applying 1.325V to that setup once more and stop if it causes a black screen.

R
55
03-08-2016, 09:52 AM
#8
I believe a 4.2ghz won't be practical, though you might attempt it. Keep in mind the risk of harm, so proceed with caution.
R
Roi_Des_Pandas
03-08-2016, 09:52 AM #8

I believe a 4.2ghz won't be practical, though you might attempt it. Keep in mind the risk of harm, so proceed with caution.

T
Taylor_Howlz
Junior Member
10
03-08-2016, 10:01 AM
#9
I can't leave my eyes on the sensors and I immediately press the restart button right after my PC crashes to refresh the CPU settings while the fans keep running.
T
Taylor_Howlz
03-08-2016, 10:01 AM #9

I can't leave my eyes on the sensors and I immediately press the restart button right after my PC crashes to refresh the CPU settings while the fans keep running.

M
Mandi_64
Member
202
03-09-2016, 03:58 PM
#10
Well, it seems the transistors have limits to how fast they can work. When things were cool and currents stayed low, nothing was pushing too hard—just a few tenths of a volt. The cores weren’t even hitting the full 1.325V, which matches what the sensors say. If I could still run benchmarks at 4.1GHz, it’d be fine for basic tasks, but games like Warzone would really test the CPU without causing damage.
M
Mandi_64
03-09-2016, 03:58 PM #10

Well, it seems the transistors have limits to how fast they can work. When things were cool and currents stayed low, nothing was pushing too hard—just a few tenths of a volt. The cores weren’t even hitting the full 1.325V, which matches what the sensors say. If I could still run benchmarks at 4.1GHz, it’d be fine for basic tasks, but games like Warzone would really test the CPU without causing damage.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next