F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Improve WiFi speed using a wired connection instead of relying solely on wireless.

Improve WiFi speed using a wired connection instead of relying solely on wireless.

Improve WiFi speed using a wired connection instead of relying solely on wireless.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
R
RageGlitch
Posting Freak
771
09-22-2016, 06:11 PM
#1
Hi, I see you're testing the setup in your new flat before drilling. For your desktop PC, a Wi-Fi dongle gives you 8ms latency but only 200-230 Mbps speed, while a UTP Cat 5e cable delivers 550 Mbps with about 13ms latency. That’s unusual—shouldn’t the cable have lower latency? Could interference or network congestion be affecting the performance?
R
RageGlitch
09-22-2016, 06:11 PM #1

Hi, I see you're testing the setup in your new flat before drilling. For your desktop PC, a Wi-Fi dongle gives you 8ms latency but only 200-230 Mbps speed, while a UTP Cat 5e cable delivers 550 Mbps with about 13ms latency. That’s unusual—shouldn’t the cable have lower latency? Could interference or network congestion be affecting the performance?

X
XylixTv
Member
193
09-23-2016, 12:10 PM
#2
I'm checking how quickly data travels (latency) and how much data can be transferred at once (bandwidth).
X
XylixTv
09-23-2016, 12:10 PM #2

I'm checking how quickly data travels (latency) and how much data can be transferred at once (bandwidth).

W
Waffley_1254
Member
227
09-25-2016, 05:29 AM
#3
Based on cable length, speed can vary. 5ghz and 2.4ghz wifi may offer less lag than ethernet, though ethernet provides more stable performance.
W
Waffley_1254
09-25-2016, 05:29 AM #3

Based on cable length, speed can vary. 5ghz and 2.4ghz wifi may offer less lag than ethernet, though ethernet provides more stable performance.

T
TheZoosk
Member
158
09-25-2016, 03:03 PM
#4
It varies based on the testing method and whether the wire connects to the same location as the WiFi. Unless you're comparing identical servers and switching between them, I wouldn't rely on that outcome.
T
TheZoosk
09-25-2016, 03:03 PM #4

It varies based on the testing method and whether the wire connects to the same location as the WiFi. Unless you're comparing identical servers and switching between them, I wouldn't rely on that outcome.

N
Ness_polystar
Member
171
09-28-2016, 03:31 AM
#5
That's not at all true, there should be no measurable difference ( 0.00000052 seconds) between a 1m cable or a 100m cable. WiFi will ALWAYS be worse by an order of ten or so. If a test shows otherwise the test is flawed, or there is some other issue going on such as drivers, software or hardware issues.
N
Ness_polystar
09-28-2016, 03:31 AM #5

That's not at all true, there should be no measurable difference ( 0.00000052 seconds) between a 1m cable or a 100m cable. WiFi will ALWAYS be worse by an order of ten or so. If a test shows otherwise the test is flawed, or there is some other issue going on such as drivers, software or hardware issues.

Y
ywo_
Junior Member
6
10-04-2016, 02:43 PM
#6
Based on the wiring in your house, it can have 200m of Ethernet with a 2-5ms variation. My computer is on the opposite side of the house, unfortunately Smile
Y
ywo_
10-04-2016, 02:43 PM #6

Based on the wiring in your house, it can have 200m of Ethernet with a 2-5ms variation. My computer is on the opposite side of the house, unfortunately Smile

S
SquishyJelly3
Member
181
10-05-2016, 08:31 PM
#7
Ethernet is limited to 100 meters, so I’m wondering if this isn’t a single cable and you’re far beyond what it’s designed for—it shouldn’t function at all. We didn’t mention damaged wiring either, since that could lead to problems. A decent 100-meter cable shouldn’t noticeably differ from a shorter one.
S
SquishyJelly3
10-05-2016, 08:31 PM #7

Ethernet is limited to 100 meters, so I’m wondering if this isn’t a single cable and you’re far beyond what it’s designed for—it shouldn’t function at all. We didn’t mention damaged wiring either, since that could lead to problems. A decent 100-meter cable shouldn’t noticeably differ from a shorter one.

J
Jumpyy
Member
64
10-10-2016, 08:35 PM
#8
I mistakenly used the term "coax" in my response, but it should be clarified. The signal remains approximately 200-250 meters.
J
Jumpyy
10-10-2016, 08:35 PM #8

I mistakenly used the term "coax" in my response, but it should be clarified. The signal remains approximately 200-250 meters.

M
Minermaster43
Member
60
10-10-2016, 10:30 PM
#9
Significant variation exists since you're changing from Ethernet to MOCA and back once more. The performance is constrained by the capabilities of the conversion, adding extra delay and possibly increasing mistakes during transmission. This isn't comparable to a straight Ethernet-to-Ethernet connection.
M
Minermaster43
10-10-2016, 10:30 PM #9

Significant variation exists since you're changing from Ethernet to MOCA and back once more. The performance is constrained by the capabilities of the conversion, adding extra delay and possibly increasing mistakes during transmission. This isn't comparable to a straight Ethernet-to-Ethernet connection.

D
DA_Red_Gamer
Member
225
10-15-2016, 02:21 AM
#10
My b
D
DA_Red_Gamer
10-15-2016, 02:21 AM #10

My b

Pages (2): 1 2 Next