Impressive, really! Ubisoft is definitely making a big impact.
Impressive, really! Ubisoft is definitely making a big impact.
2 months back I chose to purchase AC Unity. After that I began watching Linux and the discussions people share about building a PC. One month ago I bought all the necessary components for 800 €, such as an i5 4460 and an MSI GTX 970 with 8GB RAM. I also added an SSD because I wanted faster loading in multiplayer. I tried playing BF on Ultra with 100-120 FPS and Superresolution, achieving 60 FPS. Today I checked the Steam page for AC Unity and read the specifications... Are they misleading? This game runs at 30 FPS at 900p on consoles! I played every single AC title and now I’m confused... So I think Ultra isn’t right for me since I don’t have an i7 (they can’t optimize games well). I wonder how much effort went into optimizing this game for consoles compared to PCs. *Sorry for my English. I hope this isn’t a repost, but Linux is forgiving.*
Absolutely, they're making a big mistake; the creators really don't understand what a CPU actually does.
Hey there! Welcome to the forum. Keep in mind to stick to your topics—yeah, it’s all over the place here. Just the kind of nonsense we usually see from Ubisoft. Don’t stress about it; they admit the game runs on consoles that are roughly a quarter of your system’s power. You’ll max out the stats. Even in Wolfenstein: The New Order, they mentioned an i7, but nobody with an i5 had any problems. The game was decent, and the minimum requirements were the only real issue. It seems Ubisoft just keeps pushing...
I believe the lowest requirements could actually be just enough to play the game smoothly at 1080p60fps. As seen in BlackFlag and WatchDogs, Ubisoft doesn’t really tailor their titles for PC performance, since they prioritize consoles. But if it’s properly optimized and meets those specs, we might see impressive visuals.