F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Imac from late 2009 failed to display accurate CPU information.

Imac from late 2009 failed to display accurate CPU information.

Imac from late 2009 failed to display accurate CPU information.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
saukeuchiuchi
Senior Member
621
09-22-2016, 05:56 PM
#1
hello everyone, i own an imac from late 2009 and i wanted to upgrade it with an intel xeon x3480 at 3.06ghz. when i look up the specs on mac websites, it shows core i3 but with accurate frequency details. using third-party tools like cpuid for mac and geekbench gives the right name. i’m not interested in the label, but my main worry is whether the imac is actually utilizing the full power of the xeon. remember, just the name listed as i3 instead of xeon is a concern. any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated. thanks all!
S
saukeuchiuchi
09-22-2016, 05:56 PM #1

hello everyone, i own an imac from late 2009 and i wanted to upgrade it with an intel xeon x3480 at 3.06ghz. when i look up the specs on mac websites, it shows core i3 but with accurate frequency details. using third-party tools like cpuid for mac and geekbench gives the right name. i’m not interested in the label, but my main worry is whether the imac is actually utilizing the full power of the xeon. remember, just the name listed as i3 instead of xeon is a concern. any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated. thanks all!

Y
YasJawnSlayXD
Member
91
09-22-2016, 07:05 PM
#2
Can I compare them? The variations in performance between these two CPUs are noticeable. Check if they're operating correctly immediately.
Y
YasJawnSlayXD
09-22-2016, 07:05 PM #2

Can I compare them? The variations in performance between these two CPUs are noticeable. Check if they're operating correctly immediately.

O
orange9035
Member
64
09-24-2016, 11:20 PM
#3
The benchmark outcome is impressive, but I’m worried about the iMac’s performance. It seems the Xeon CPU might not be utilizing its full potential. I’m trying to figure out why that’s the case since the Xeon shares the same specifications as the i3, yet it runs at a higher frequency and supports more RAM with ECC support.
O
orange9035
09-24-2016, 11:20 PM #3

The benchmark outcome is impressive, but I’m worried about the iMac’s performance. It seems the Xeon CPU might not be utilizing its full potential. I’m trying to figure out why that’s the case since the Xeon shares the same specifications as the i3, yet it runs at a higher frequency and supports more RAM with ECC support.

P
pieterpost123
Member
184
09-26-2016, 02:22 AM
#4
If the results have shifted, I won’t be concerned. Are all 8 threads visible? The i3 would have been limited to 4, which would confirm it clearly.
P
pieterpost123
09-26-2016, 02:22 AM #4

If the results have shifted, I won’t be concerned. Are all 8 threads visible? The i3 would have been limited to 4, which would confirm it clearly.

A
Abe_YouTube7
Member
125
10-01-2016, 01:29 PM
#5
Certainly! To ensure your Xeon operates at its maximum capacity, focus on regular performance monitoring, proper cooling, and optimal workload management. Check utilization metrics, maintain clean airflow, and update firmware to keep the hardware running efficiently.
A
Abe_YouTube7
10-01-2016, 01:29 PM #5

Certainly! To ensure your Xeon operates at its maximum capacity, focus on regular performance monitoring, proper cooling, and optimal workload management. Check utilization metrics, maintain clean airflow, and update firmware to keep the hardware running efficiently.

A
Autilas
Junior Member
22
10-08-2016, 02:51 AM
#6
You're using a benchmark tool like Geekbench to measure CPU performance. Compare your score to the stock system's rating for context. For instance, an older i3 in a late 2009 MacBook might earn 500 points, while yours achieves 1500, highlighting the difference.
A
Autilas
10-08-2016, 02:51 AM #6

You're using a benchmark tool like Geekbench to measure CPU performance. Compare your score to the stock system's rating for context. For instance, an older i3 in a late 2009 MacBook might earn 500 points, while yours achieves 1500, highlighting the difference.

T
The_Izuki
Junior Member
18
10-13-2016, 12:05 PM
#7
If theres a big difference you're fine. There are tools available on hackintoshing forums ( as well as others ) that will work with a regular mac to change the CPU name in "about this mac"
T
The_Izuki
10-13-2016, 12:05 PM #7

If theres a big difference you're fine. There are tools available on hackintoshing forums ( as well as others ) that will work with a regular mac to change the CPU name in "about this mac"

J
JasonZz
Junior Member
40
10-15-2016, 02:03 AM
#8
Hey there, The problem is that even if your CPU is perfectly working with your motherboard, and you see the full performances dished out, Mac OS X has no definition to recognise the CPU you installed because Apple did't ever sell a computer with that particular CPU. To have the correct CPU name displayed head to this thread on TonyMacx86 and learn how to mod you "About this Mac" tab! Cheers Slid
J
JasonZz
10-15-2016, 02:03 AM #8

Hey there, The problem is that even if your CPU is perfectly working with your motherboard, and you see the full performances dished out, Mac OS X has no definition to recognise the CPU you installed because Apple did't ever sell a computer with that particular CPU. To have the correct CPU name displayed head to this thread on TonyMacx86 and learn how to mod you "About this Mac" tab! Cheers Slid

Q
197
10-17-2016, 04:47 AM
#9
You could simply grant administrative privileges to modify configuration files directly.
Q
Quinnsillyhead
10-17-2016, 04:47 AM #9

You could simply grant administrative privileges to modify configuration files directly.

L
LimoLama
Member
89
10-18-2016, 07:59 AM
#10
Not found on Mac. The system isn't managed by the operating system but by the firmware.
L
LimoLama
10-18-2016, 07:59 AM #10

Not found on Mac. The system isn't managed by the operating system but by the firmware.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next