F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop I'm new to this and have some doubts.

I'm new to this and have some doubts.

I'm new to this and have some doubts.

J
jonttutonttu1
Member
214
12-15-2016, 02:23 PM
#1
I built my setup a few months ago and just cranked the multiplier to 50. After about half an hour of gaming (GTA V), I checked the temperatures with CPU-Z and found nothing alarming. But after 20 minutes of stress testing, the numbers jumped significantly—85°C on CPU-Z and even higher with Prime95. That’s a big change from the 74°C I saw earlier. Running a 240mm AIO in a compact tower means upgrading the cooler isn’t feasible. Now I’m weighing my choices: lowering the multiplier or adjusting the voltage. Since I’m not heavily CPU-intensive, cutting the multiplier to 49 or 48 should be fine, but voltage is tricky. The BIOS sets it at 1.20, yet it reads 1.40 under load—could that be overvoltage? If so, how can I prevent it? Reducing the BIOS voltage might help, though it could affect stability if the CPU exceeds its limits. To bring things back in check, I’ll need to monitor temperatures closely and explore ways to manage them effectively. If needed, tweaking the BIOS settings or using better cooling could be the next steps.
J
jonttutonttu1
12-15-2016, 02:23 PM #1

I built my setup a few months ago and just cranked the multiplier to 50. After about half an hour of gaming (GTA V), I checked the temperatures with CPU-Z and found nothing alarming. But after 20 minutes of stress testing, the numbers jumped significantly—85°C on CPU-Z and even higher with Prime95. That’s a big change from the 74°C I saw earlier. Running a 240mm AIO in a compact tower means upgrading the cooler isn’t feasible. Now I’m weighing my choices: lowering the multiplier or adjusting the voltage. Since I’m not heavily CPU-intensive, cutting the multiplier to 49 or 48 should be fine, but voltage is tricky. The BIOS sets it at 1.20, yet it reads 1.40 under load—could that be overvoltage? If so, how can I prevent it? Reducing the BIOS voltage might help, though it could affect stability if the CPU exceeds its limits. To bring things back in check, I’ll need to monitor temperatures closely and explore ways to manage them effectively. If needed, tweaking the BIOS settings or using better cooling could be the next steps.

I
iDoNotEvenLift
Posting Freak
936
12-15-2016, 07:16 PM
#2
Operates at 1.4v under load due to 14nm process and high-frequency capability across all 14nm chips exceeding 4.7ghz. Achieving 5ghz between 1.35–1.40v is feasible, with 1.40v being near the upper limit. Performance stems from dense transistor packing—8 cores, 1.736 billion transistors. These devices heat up significantly despite the voltage. For better control, manually adjust settings rather than relying on auto-biased LLC voltage, which tends to be extreme when auto is enabled.
I
iDoNotEvenLift
12-15-2016, 07:16 PM #2

Operates at 1.4v under load due to 14nm process and high-frequency capability across all 14nm chips exceeding 4.7ghz. Achieving 5ghz between 1.35–1.40v is feasible, with 1.40v being near the upper limit. Performance stems from dense transistor packing—8 cores, 1.736 billion transistors. These devices heat up significantly despite the voltage. For better control, manually adjust settings rather than relying on auto-biased LLC voltage, which tends to be extreme when auto is enabled.

M
Misterjaws77
Member
215
12-16-2016, 01:04 AM
#3
these temperatures work well for 1.4v, but prime95 doesn't reflect actual real-world conditions. I'd stick with those settings unless you believe they're too high—then reduce them to 4.9. Consider dropping the voltage to 1.375v at 5ghz and check stability.
M
Misterjaws77
12-16-2016, 01:04 AM #3

these temperatures work well for 1.4v, but prime95 doesn't reflect actual real-world conditions. I'd stick with those settings unless you believe they're too high—then reduce them to 4.9. Consider dropping the voltage to 1.375v at 5ghz and check stability.

S
Shadowc8
Junior Member
28
12-21-2016, 03:04 PM
#4
This involves adjusting individual core frequencies rather than just the overall settings. You’ve modified the voltage to reduce overvoltage and changed the overclocking strategy to balance performance and stability. To fine-tune each core separately, you’d need to access the BIOS or motherboard settings where per-core multipliers are configured. Some systems allow you to set different values for each core in the advanced power management or CPU settings menu. If not available, you might have to rely on monitoring tools to observe and tweak them manually while testing under load.
S
Shadowc8
12-21-2016, 03:04 PM #4

This involves adjusting individual core frequencies rather than just the overall settings. You’ve modified the voltage to reduce overvoltage and changed the overclocking strategy to balance performance and stability. To fine-tune each core separately, you’d need to access the BIOS or motherboard settings where per-core multipliers are configured. Some systems allow you to set different values for each core in the advanced power management or CPU settings menu. If not available, you might have to rely on monitoring tools to observe and tweak them manually while testing under load.

R
rosaliE65
Member
211
12-22-2016, 07:10 PM
#5
These are boost multipliers. Adjust all of them together. When you operate separately, they only reach the level of the first core and stay there. If you run independently, all cores will increase up to but not surpass the first core frequency. 5Ghz, 1.350v should work well. The LLC setting can be tailored to your requirements. Cache ratio seems suitable for a stable 4.7ghz. When you reduce voltage and LLC, the board will automatically adjust and lower the clocks as well.
R
rosaliE65
12-22-2016, 07:10 PM #5

These are boost multipliers. Adjust all of them together. When you operate separately, they only reach the level of the first core and stay there. If you run independently, all cores will increase up to but not surpass the first core frequency. 5Ghz, 1.350v should work well. The LLC setting can be tailored to your requirements. Cache ratio seems suitable for a stable 4.7ghz. When you reduce voltage and LLC, the board will automatically adjust and lower the clocks as well.

D
DYLARK01
Member
199
12-22-2016, 08:42 PM
#6
But the initial four cores are configured at 50 while the final one is at 48. It seems like everyone was confused about why all cores were restricted to 48. To clarify, I didn’t assign a separate multiplier for each core; instead, the overall multiplier adjusts based on the total number of cores the system uses. That makes sense now. Oops.
D
DYLARK01
12-22-2016, 08:42 PM #6

But the initial four cores are configured at 50 while the final one is at 48. It seems like everyone was confused about why all cores were restricted to 48. To clarify, I didn’t assign a separate multiplier for each core; instead, the overall multiplier adjusts based on the total number of cores the system uses. That makes sense now. Oops.