F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming I’m experiencing poor frame rates in Battlefield V.

I’m experiencing poor frame rates in Battlefield V.

I’m experiencing poor frame rates in Battlefield V.

E
Edlestier
Member
55
03-25-2018, 07:43 AM
#1
I'm achieving approximately 100 frames per second in Battlefield V at minimum settings. My system includes a GTX 1080 graphics card, a Ryzen 2700x processor, and 16 gigabytes of RAM. Considering these specifications, would I be able to attain a higher frame rate?
E
Edlestier
03-25-2018, 07:43 AM #1

I'm achieving approximately 100 frames per second in Battlefield V at minimum settings. My system includes a GTX 1080 graphics card, a Ryzen 2700x processor, and 16 gigabytes of RAM. Considering these specifications, would I be able to attain a higher frame rate?

K
Kapodistrias
Member
130
03-29-2018, 11:08 AM
#2
Based on my experience, lowering or disabling graphical settings in Battlefield V doesn’t significantly improve performance. I recently bought the game and was getting frame rates between 58 and 80, predominantly at 70 fps, on my system with a 1080p resolution and ultra settings using DirectX 12. My hardware performs more effectively when running in DirectX 12 mode compared to DirectX 11. Here are my system specifications:
Intel Xeon E5-2667 V4 @ 2.9GHz (8 cores, 16 threads)
4GB of DDR4-2400 memory running in dual channels
ASRock X99 Taichi motherboard
Palit GTX 1060 with 6GB of VRAM
Samsung 970 evo 500GB M.2 SSD
My processor typically operates at around 50% utilization while the graphics card is maxed out, with a slight overclock applied without any voltage adjustments. You should easily achieve frame rates exceeding 120 fps with your system configuration.
Watch this video for more information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeF_sZdsWFE
Were you using only one stick of RAM? If so, that may explain the performance. Utilizing dual channel memory makes a considerable difference compared to single-channel operation.
K
Kapodistrias
03-29-2018, 11:08 AM #2

Based on my experience, lowering or disabling graphical settings in Battlefield V doesn’t significantly improve performance. I recently bought the game and was getting frame rates between 58 and 80, predominantly at 70 fps, on my system with a 1080p resolution and ultra settings using DirectX 12. My hardware performs more effectively when running in DirectX 12 mode compared to DirectX 11. Here are my system specifications:
Intel Xeon E5-2667 V4 @ 2.9GHz (8 cores, 16 threads)
4GB of DDR4-2400 memory running in dual channels
ASRock X99 Taichi motherboard
Palit GTX 1060 with 6GB of VRAM
Samsung 970 evo 500GB M.2 SSD
My processor typically operates at around 50% utilization while the graphics card is maxed out, with a slight overclock applied without any voltage adjustments. You should easily achieve frame rates exceeding 120 fps with your system configuration.
Watch this video for more information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeF_sZdsWFE
Were you using only one stick of RAM? If so, that may explain the performance. Utilizing dual channel memory makes a considerable difference compared to single-channel operation.

E
117
04-17-2018, 06:31 PM
#3
Appears suitable
E
Enderzilla_FTW
04-17-2018, 06:31 PM #3

Appears suitable

L
LtPenguin
Junior Member
29
04-22-2018, 11:00 PM
#4
Utilizing DirectX 11,
Based on information from https://www.techspot.com/review/1754-bat...yer-bench/.
L
LtPenguin
04-22-2018, 11:00 PM #4

Utilizing DirectX 11,
Based on information from https://www.techspot.com/review/1754-bat...yer-bench/.

X
Xytrixz
Senior Member
552
04-23-2018, 12:46 AM
#5
Although I've adjusted all the parameters to their minimum levels, do you still believe this is typical?
X
Xytrixz
04-23-2018, 12:46 AM #5

Although I've adjusted all the parameters to their minimum levels, do you still believe this is typical?

W
Wumty
Member
195
04-23-2018, 07:44 PM
#6
Based on my experience, lowering or disabling graphical settings in Battlefield V doesn't significantly improve performance. I recently bought the game and experienced frame rates ranging from 58 to 80 frames per second (typically around 70) on my system at 1080p with ultra settings using DirectX 12. My hardware performs more effectively when running in DirectX 12 compared to DirectX 11. Here’s a breakdown of my specifications:

* Xeon E5-2667 V4 2.9GHz (8 core, 16 threads)
* 4x4Gb DDR4-2400 quad channel memory
* Asrock X99 Taichi motherboard
* Palit GTX 1060 6Gb graphics card
* Samsung 970 evo 500Gb M.2 SSD

My central processing unit typically operates at around 50% utilization while the graphics card is running at maximum capacity, with a slight overclock applied without any voltage adjustments. You should be able to achieve 120+ frames per second with your configuration.

You can view a related video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeF_sZdsWFE

Did you utilize a single stick of RAM? If so, that may explain the observed performance. Running memory in dual channel mode has a considerably larger impact than using single channel operation.
W
Wumty
04-23-2018, 07:44 PM #6

Based on my experience, lowering or disabling graphical settings in Battlefield V doesn't significantly improve performance. I recently bought the game and experienced frame rates ranging from 58 to 80 frames per second (typically around 70) on my system at 1080p with ultra settings using DirectX 12. My hardware performs more effectively when running in DirectX 12 compared to DirectX 11. Here’s a breakdown of my specifications:

* Xeon E5-2667 V4 2.9GHz (8 core, 16 threads)
* 4x4Gb DDR4-2400 quad channel memory
* Asrock X99 Taichi motherboard
* Palit GTX 1060 6Gb graphics card
* Samsung 970 evo 500Gb M.2 SSD

My central processing unit typically operates at around 50% utilization while the graphics card is running at maximum capacity, with a slight overclock applied without any voltage adjustments. You should be able to achieve 120+ frames per second with your configuration.

You can view a related video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeF_sZdsWFE

Did you utilize a single stick of RAM? If so, that may explain the observed performance. Running memory in dual channel mode has a considerably larger impact than using single channel operation.