F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks IIS, SMB, FTP – welche Technologie passt zu dir?

IIS, SMB, FTP – welche Technologie passt zu dir?

IIS, SMB, FTP – welche Technologie passt zu dir?

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
M
Mod_masta
Member
191
02-27-2016, 06:30 PM
#11
CPU Ethernet connection
M
Mod_masta
02-27-2016, 06:30 PM #11

CPU Ethernet connection

R
Remigiusz1991
Member
68
02-28-2016, 01:48 AM
#12
I performed a bandwidth test with my gaming PC acting as the server, which features a 2.5 Gbps NIC. It didn’t exceed the 2 Gbps limit, but file transfers remained faster than about 100 MBps.
R
Remigiusz1991
02-28-2016, 01:48 AM #12

I performed a bandwidth test with my gaming PC acting as the server, which features a 2.5 Gbps NIC. It didn’t exceed the 2 Gbps limit, but file transfers remained faster than about 100 MBps.

M
MishaCo
Junior Member
18
02-28-2016, 09:21 AM
#13
I need to try FastCopy and FileZilla. I checked IIS for an FTP on Windows, but the speeds were even worse. Still not sure what’s happening.
M
MishaCo
02-28-2016, 09:21 AM #13

I need to try FastCopy and FileZilla. I checked IIS for an FTP on Windows, but the speeds were even worse. Still not sure what’s happening.

L
ladymorepork
Posting Freak
791
02-28-2016, 10:22 AM
#14
I was expecting this to be the main issue. This seems uncertain, but perhaps disabling Remote Differential Compression on both devices could help? Here’s the link: https://www.easeus.com/pc-transfer/file-...-,Solution 2. Turn Off "Remote Differential Compression",-The Remote Differential It does need a restart after disabling
L
ladymorepork
02-28-2016, 10:22 AM #14

I was expecting this to be the main issue. This seems uncertain, but perhaps disabling Remote Differential Compression on both devices could help? Here’s the link: https://www.easeus.com/pc-transfer/file-...-,Solution 2. Turn Off "Remote Differential Compression",-The Remote Differential It does need a restart after disabling

J
JR_GAMER07
Posting Freak
915
02-28-2016, 12:56 PM
#15
I turned off Remote Differential Compression on both machines, but it didn’t improve performance. I’m still experiencing speeds between 80 to 120 MBps via SMB Direct, though it’s quite variable. FTP through FileZilla was very reliable at around 135 MBps. I’m surprised it isn’t better. When I first set up the network, my LAN transfers were consistently 280 MBps. It seems possible and not just a myth. I think it shouldn’t be this difficult. What are your thoughts on enabling legacy SMB through Windows instead of depending solely on SMB? Also, I’ve noticed devices on the same subnet are separate VLANs, but I have communication rules allowing them to talk. The subnets are open in firewall settings, which makes things complicated. Changing that setup would be a hassle, but could it help?
J
JR_GAMER07
02-28-2016, 12:56 PM #15

I turned off Remote Differential Compression on both machines, but it didn’t improve performance. I’m still experiencing speeds between 80 to 120 MBps via SMB Direct, though it’s quite variable. FTP through FileZilla was very reliable at around 135 MBps. I’m surprised it isn’t better. When I first set up the network, my LAN transfers were consistently 280 MBps. It seems possible and not just a myth. I think it shouldn’t be this difficult. What are your thoughts on enabling legacy SMB through Windows instead of depending solely on SMB? Also, I’ve noticed devices on the same subnet are separate VLANs, but I have communication rules allowing them to talk. The subnets are open in firewall settings, which makes things complicated. Changing that setup would be a hassle, but could it help?

P
peter4everpan
Member
235
02-28-2016, 06:04 PM
#16
The router's CPU must handle every connection and rule, no matter how simple, which greatly slows down performance.
P
peter4everpan
02-28-2016, 06:04 PM #16

The router's CPU must handle every connection and rule, no matter how simple, which greatly slows down performance.

D
Djefish
Member
184
02-29-2016, 11:44 PM
#17
I was worried people might think it’s a smart move, right? I had to turn it on so the VPN would connect through T-Mobile. However, it introduced many more restrictions. Would turning off IPv6 help improve performance on your local network?
D
Djefish
02-29-2016, 11:44 PM #17

I was worried people might think it’s a smart move, right? I had to turn it on so the VPN would connect through T-Mobile. However, it introduced many more restrictions. Would turning off IPv6 help improve performance on your local network?

T
tiranitar90
Junior Member
14
03-01-2016, 07:44 AM
#18
It doesn't matter. The router handles intra-VLAN data, which is the main issue.
T
tiranitar90
03-01-2016, 07:44 AM #18

It doesn't matter. The router handles intra-VLAN data, which is the main issue.

M
mr_azitium
Member
95
03-02-2016, 08:23 AM
#19
It seems unusual since the speed is only slightly above 1 Gbps. Would connecting the two machines via an Ethernet cable work for a quick test, without a router or switch? The devices should automatically detect each other and link at 2.5 Gbps. If needed, you can manually assign IP addresses—like 192.168.0.101 and 192.168.0.102 with a 255.255.255.0 mask—and run multiple FTP transfers simultaneously. Also, just observed in your recent photos that the connection is actually 1 Gbps; note how the Ethernet card names on both sides show 1 Gbps. Is your card still reaching the rest of the network at that speed?
M
mr_azitium
03-02-2016, 08:23 AM #19

It seems unusual since the speed is only slightly above 1 Gbps. Would connecting the two machines via an Ethernet cable work for a quick test, without a router or switch? The devices should automatically detect each other and link at 2.5 Gbps. If needed, you can manually assign IP addresses—like 192.168.0.101 and 192.168.0.102 with a 255.255.255.0 mask—and run multiple FTP transfers simultaneously. Also, just observed in your recent photos that the connection is actually 1 Gbps; note how the Ethernet card names on both sides show 1 Gbps. Is your card still reaching the rest of the network at that speed?

H
HDellrON
Senior Member
257
03-02-2016, 03:49 PM
#20
It's surprising to notice traffic rules could cut transfer speeds nearly in half. Still, it might be worth trying. I'm okay with these two devices sharing the same VLAN.
H
HDellrON
03-02-2016, 03:49 PM #20

It's surprising to notice traffic rules could cut transfer speeds nearly in half. Still, it might be worth trying. I'm okay with these two devices sharing the same VLAN.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next