F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Ideal choice for your Asrock J3355M is a reliable gaming PC build.

Ideal choice for your Asrock J3355M is a reliable gaming PC build.

Ideal choice for your Asrock J3355M is a reliable gaming PC build.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
A
AlisonDL
Junior Member
10
11-11-2016, 12:08 PM
#1
Hi, for your setup I suggest a lightweight Linux distribution like LiteOS or a minimal Debian variant. These will give you a good balance between performance and stability on your Asrock J3355 with modest specs.
A
AlisonDL
11-11-2016, 12:08 PM #1

Hi, for your setup I suggest a lightweight Linux distribution like LiteOS or a minimal Debian variant. These will give you a good balance between performance and stability on your Asrock J3355 with modest specs.

D
DreaMaker20
Member
124
11-16-2016, 05:21 PM
#2
Overhead varies slightly between different desktop setups. Do you have any background in Linux?
D
DreaMaker20
11-16-2016, 05:21 PM #2

Overhead varies slightly between different desktop setups. Do you have any background in Linux?

F
FiGamerPT
Member
154
11-24-2016, 06:51 AM
#3
I experimented with Linux Mint for a short period, encountering some odd problems with the WLAN or YouTube videos (poor fullscreen transition and subpar video rendering versus Windows). These issues eventually led me back to Windows. Later, I noted that the problems occurred on another device but were similar when using the TP-Link WLAN PCIe adapter I had previously used. I also installed the WLAN Adapter: WLAN: TP-Link TL-WN881ND Ver. 2.0
F
FiGamerPT
11-24-2016, 06:51 AM #3

I experimented with Linux Mint for a short period, encountering some odd problems with the WLAN or YouTube videos (poor fullscreen transition and subpar video rendering versus Windows). These issues eventually led me back to Windows. Later, I noted that the problems occurred on another device but were similar when using the TP-Link WLAN PCIe adapter I had previously used. I also installed the WLAN Adapter: WLAN: TP-Link TL-WN881ND Ver. 2.0

R
Roynity
Junior Member
5
11-24-2016, 08:36 AM
#4
Choose mint for its lighter weight, though it looks plain. I’d favor Ubuntu with XFCE, which also feels compact compared to the heavier GNOME version.
R
Roynity
11-24-2016, 08:36 AM #4

Choose mint for its lighter weight, though it looks plain. I’d favor Ubuntu with XFCE, which also feels compact compared to the heavier GNOME version.

_
_GodPotato_
Member
105
11-27-2016, 08:06 PM
#5
Debian runs efficiently but may feel complex for newcomers. Consider MX Linux (Debian-derived with better usability) and an XFCE desktop, which reportedly uses fewer resources. They also offer a Fluxbox variant that’s even more lightweight.
_
_GodPotato_
11-27-2016, 08:06 PM #5

Debian runs efficiently but may feel complex for newcomers. Consider MX Linux (Debian-derived with better usability) and an XFCE desktop, which reportedly uses fewer resources. They also offer a Fluxbox variant that’s even more lightweight.

R
RwarCatz
Member
67
11-28-2016, 04:51 AM
#6
You might consider Xubuntu, Lubuntu, or Linux Mint XFCE. I've tested all three on budget or older machines, they feel quite smooth. However, I ran the operating system from a live USB instead of a hard drive.
R
RwarCatz
11-28-2016, 04:51 AM #6

You might consider Xubuntu, Lubuntu, or Linux Mint XFCE. I've tested all three on budget or older machines, they feel quite smooth. However, I ran the operating system from a live USB instead of a hard drive.

M
MrKiwiism
Member
236
11-28-2016, 11:20 AM
#7
I run Linux Mint XFCE on my laptop with an i5-4200U and it runs smoothly; it handles web browsing and YouTube well. However, based on what I understand, the J3355 still lags behind my 4200U (per UserBenchmark—take it with a grain of salt). It seems there’s a possibility that sites like YouTube might be too demanding for this processor, no matter which distribution you choose (especially if some tasks can be shifted to the 710). I’m not discouraging you from trying, but I advise keeping expectations realistic.
M
MrKiwiism
11-28-2016, 11:20 AM #7

I run Linux Mint XFCE on my laptop with an i5-4200U and it runs smoothly; it handles web browsing and YouTube well. However, based on what I understand, the J3355 still lags behind my 4200U (per UserBenchmark—take it with a grain of salt). It seems there’s a possibility that sites like YouTube might be too demanding for this processor, no matter which distribution you choose (especially if some tasks can be shifted to the 710). I’m not discouraging you from trying, but I advise keeping expectations realistic.

E
Elmokiller88
Junior Member
34
11-28-2016, 03:07 PM
#8
YT really shines when your GPU (or integrated graphics) supports modern codecs like AV1 and VP9. If it can't handle them natively, everything shifts to the CPU, which usually limits performance. You might end up with lower quality or resolution. For reference, my setup uses an i7-6700 and only manages 4K on YT, while an i7-7700K handles 4K smoothly—though at around 80% capacity. Linux doesn’t seem to change that much in terms of browser encoding efficiency compared to Windows. The benefit is it uses fewer system resources, giving more power to the main task.
E
Elmokiller88
11-28-2016, 03:07 PM #8

YT really shines when your GPU (or integrated graphics) supports modern codecs like AV1 and VP9. If it can't handle them natively, everything shifts to the CPU, which usually limits performance. You might end up with lower quality or resolution. For reference, my setup uses an i7-6700 and only manages 4K on YT, while an i7-7700K handles 4K smoothly—though at around 80% capacity. Linux doesn’t seem to change that much in terms of browser encoding efficiency compared to Windows. The benefit is it uses fewer system resources, giving more power to the main task.

I
Inezze009
Senior Member
716
12-05-2016, 01:14 AM
#9
I checked the information and found that according to CPU-Monkey, the HD 500 graphics in the OP's J3355 model appear to support hardware decoding for most modern codecs, with the exception of AV1. It seems they could work fine.
I
Inezze009
12-05-2016, 01:14 AM #9

I checked the information and found that according to CPU-Monkey, the HD 500 graphics in the OP's J3355 model appear to support hardware decoding for most modern codecs, with the exception of AV1. It seems they could work fine.

B
BellaMaria88
Member
192
12-10-2016, 01:20 PM
#10
It varies based on the content being viewed. By examining the stuttering issue in 4K channels versus non-stuttering ones, it becomes clear that the type of codec influences CPU usage during decoding. For instance, Gamers Nexus employs a codec that demands significant processing power. Checking "stats for nerds" in Chrome reveals the specific codec in use. While it may seem similar across platforms and resolutions, factors like hardware capabilities or display settings can affect performance. Ultimately, testing in real time with your preferred apps will give the most accurate insight. For graphics-heavy tasks, resolution plays a key role. With a modern CPU and an iGPU, 4K viewing typically places minimal strain on the processor. I use Ryzen 7600 and 7900 models for this purpose.
B
BellaMaria88
12-10-2016, 01:20 PM #10

It varies based on the content being viewed. By examining the stuttering issue in 4K channels versus non-stuttering ones, it becomes clear that the type of codec influences CPU usage during decoding. For instance, Gamers Nexus employs a codec that demands significant processing power. Checking "stats for nerds" in Chrome reveals the specific codec in use. While it may seem similar across platforms and resolutions, factors like hardware capabilities or display settings can affect performance. Ultimately, testing in real time with your preferred apps will give the most accurate insight. For graphics-heavy tasks, resolution plays a key role. With a modern CPU and an iGPU, 4K viewing typically places minimal strain on the processor. I use Ryzen 7600 and 7900 models for this purpose.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next