F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop i9 10900 or consider Ryzen 4000 for gaming and video editing?

i9 10900 or consider Ryzen 4000 for gaming and video editing?

i9 10900 or consider Ryzen 4000 for gaming and video editing?

L
LucaSpielt
Junior Member
10
06-28-2020, 07:43 PM
#1
Hello, I'm beginning to set up a new PC and need some advice. My workload is mostly gaming (45%), photo editing (45%) as a wedding photographer, and 10% for 4K video editing using Premiere, Resolve, and After Effects. I'm unsure whether to choose the i9 10900 now or wait for the Ryzen 4000. Should I go for an i9 10900 or hold off? Also, I'm considering a high-end Ampere GPU when it comes out. I currently have a Vega 56 with 64 BIOS. What do you think?
L
LucaSpielt
06-28-2020, 07:43 PM #1

Hello, I'm beginning to set up a new PC and need some advice. My workload is mostly gaming (45%), photo editing (45%) as a wedding photographer, and 10% for 4K video editing using Premiere, Resolve, and After Effects. I'm unsure whether to choose the i9 10900 now or wait for the Ryzen 4000. Should I go for an i9 10900 or hold off? Also, I'm considering a high-end Ampere GPU when it comes out. I currently have a Vega 56 with 64 BIOS. What do you think?

H
h31kk1n3n
Member
80
06-29-2020, 06:51 AM
#2
Hold on, please.
H
h31kk1n3n
06-29-2020, 06:51 AM #2

Hold on, please.

B
BlueStar_LH
Posting Freak
842
06-29-2020, 08:13 AM
#3
Wait, the 10900 non-K model is a poor choice since it falls short compared to the current 3900X in all aspects.
B
BlueStar_LH
06-29-2020, 08:13 AM #3

Wait, the 10900 non-K model is a poor choice since it falls short compared to the current 3900X in all aspects.

C
crachh
Junior Member
23
07-12-2020, 10:23 AM
#4
Purchase an inexpensive Ryzen, hold it for a while, then resell it.
C
crachh
07-12-2020, 10:23 AM #4

Purchase an inexpensive Ryzen, hold it for a while, then resell it.

O
oG10o
Junior Member
6
07-13-2020, 03:47 AM
#5
The standard 10900 non-K model performs worse compared to the 3900X currently available. If possible, hold off on the 3900X unless you're ready for the 3900X; it offers better performance across all scenarios. There isn't a substantial difference in specs between the 10900 and the K version, but a clear distinction exists.
O
oG10o
07-13-2020, 03:47 AM #5

The standard 10900 non-K model performs worse compared to the 3900X currently available. If possible, hold off on the 3900X unless you're ready for the 3900X; it offers better performance across all scenarios. There isn't a substantial difference in specs between the 10900 and the K version, but a clear distinction exists.