F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking i need assistance with 10700k oc

i need assistance with 10700k oc

i need assistance with 10700k oc

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
Mr_Floobiful
Posting Freak
890
11-13-2020, 09:39 AM
#1
guy, you're my last chance, I think I'm making a mistake with my OC. The temps are really high, especially when I start a game they hit 90c. I have 10700k z490 aorus elite and msi mag aio 360r. Can someone advise me on what to do in tweaker mode? I'm using a fixed vcore at 1.35v, which is the only setting that keeps the PC from crashing.
M
Mr_Floobiful
11-13-2020, 09:39 AM #1

guy, you're my last chance, I think I'm making a mistake with my OC. The temps are really high, especially when I start a game they hit 90c. I have 10700k z490 aorus elite and msi mag aio 360r. Can someone advise me on what to do in tweaker mode? I'm using a fixed vcore at 1.35v, which is the only setting that keeps the PC from crashing.

A
Arzuzizu
Member
152
11-13-2020, 10:49 AM
#2
Initially, what you aim to achieve with overclocking was receiving enhanced performance from a quality chip. That’s no longer the case.
Modern processors are grouped into categories, and top-tier models are reserved for higher-end builds.
If gaming is your goal, stock configurations enable turbo boosts beyond what you could manually adjust across cores.
For batch processing with all cores engaged, overclocking might be worthwhile.
If you’re simply testing the limits for fun, it’s a good idea to try it.
Heat generation stems from elevated CPU voltage and active cores.
A 360AIO could perform well if installed correctly; however, MSI reports some problems with it.
Still, running at 90°C under load isn’t entirely negative, while reaching 100°C marks the point of throttling.
A
Arzuzizu
11-13-2020, 10:49 AM #2

Initially, what you aim to achieve with overclocking was receiving enhanced performance from a quality chip. That’s no longer the case.
Modern processors are grouped into categories, and top-tier models are reserved for higher-end builds.
If gaming is your goal, stock configurations enable turbo boosts beyond what you could manually adjust across cores.
For batch processing with all cores engaged, overclocking might be worthwhile.
If you’re simply testing the limits for fun, it’s a good idea to try it.
Heat generation stems from elevated CPU voltage and active cores.
A 360AIO could perform well if installed correctly; however, MSI reports some problems with it.
Still, running at 90°C under load isn’t entirely negative, while reaching 100°C marks the point of throttling.

K
kieranwebster
Member
62
11-14-2020, 03:29 PM
#3
What is the CPU speed you're using? If your setup has a constant VCore, you should also set a consistent multiplier and top speed. A speed near 4.8 GHz could be a suitable starting point for testing.
K
kieranwebster
11-14-2020, 03:29 PM #3

What is the CPU speed you're using? If your setup has a constant VCore, you should also set a consistent multiplier and top speed. A speed near 4.8 GHz could be a suitable starting point for testing.

K
KLM_Anonymous
Junior Member
19
11-14-2020, 05:27 PM
#4
Brother, I can walk you through this step by step. It seems your system runs at around 5.1ghz with a CPU clock ratio of 51 and ring ratio of 42. The settings for BCLK adaptive voltage, CPU VCO, CPU system agent voltage, and CPU graphics voltage are all set to auto. I only adjusted the CPU ratio and ring ratio. Over the past year, during gaming, temperatures hovered between 60-67°C, but when starting a game, they spike to 80-88°C. In the lobby, it drops to around 50°C, then rises to the 60s during gaming. When using Adobe Premiere on 1080p videos, it reaches 88-92°C, and at idle it’s between 38-44°C. If I open a web browser, it spikes to 50-66°C before cooling down to the 40s. It looks like the voltage levels are much higher than expected. Thanks for your help—I’ve been looking for solutions for a long time.
K
KLM_Anonymous
11-14-2020, 05:27 PM #4

Brother, I can walk you through this step by step. It seems your system runs at around 5.1ghz with a CPU clock ratio of 51 and ring ratio of 42. The settings for BCLK adaptive voltage, CPU VCO, CPU system agent voltage, and CPU graphics voltage are all set to auto. I only adjusted the CPU ratio and ring ratio. Over the past year, during gaming, temperatures hovered between 60-67°C, but when starting a game, they spike to 80-88°C. In the lobby, it drops to around 50°C, then rises to the 60s during gaming. When using Adobe Premiere on 1080p videos, it reaches 88-92°C, and at idle it’s between 38-44°C. If I open a web browser, it spikes to 50-66°C before cooling down to the 40s. It looks like the voltage levels are much higher than expected. Thanks for your help—I’ve been looking for solutions for a long time.

J
jonaxg7
Member
73
11-25-2020, 11:37 PM
#5
When using uWebb429, you're beginning at an incorrect level since you're not yet acquainted with the procedure. This approach is likely to fail due to this issue. You should consider getting a new cooler.
J
jonaxg7
11-25-2020, 11:37 PM #5

When using uWebb429, you're beginning at an incorrect level since you're not yet acquainted with the procedure. This approach is likely to fail due to this issue. You should consider getting a new cooler.

X
xSneik
Member
178
11-26-2020, 05:03 AM
#6
Initially, what you aim to achieve with overclocking was receiving enhanced performance from a quality chip. That’s no longer the case.
Modern processors are categorized and higher-end models are reserved for premium configurations.
If your goal is gaming, stock configurations will enable the turbo feature to push performance beyond what you could manually adjust across cores.
For batch processing with all cores engaged, overclocking may still be worthwhile.
If your aim is simply testing the limits and enjoying the challenge, proceed.
Heat generation stems from elevated CPU voltage and active cores.
I think a 360AIO would perform optimally if installed correctly; MSI appears to have problems with it.
Still, running at 90°C under load isn’t entirely negative.
Reaching 100°C marks the point of throttling.
It could be beneficial to start with stock settings and compare your maximum overclock to observe any noticeable improvements in gameplay.
Be mindful of the placebo effect.
X
xSneik
11-26-2020, 05:03 AM #6

Initially, what you aim to achieve with overclocking was receiving enhanced performance from a quality chip. That’s no longer the case.
Modern processors are categorized and higher-end models are reserved for premium configurations.
If your goal is gaming, stock configurations will enable the turbo feature to push performance beyond what you could manually adjust across cores.
For batch processing with all cores engaged, overclocking may still be worthwhile.
If your aim is simply testing the limits and enjoying the challenge, proceed.
Heat generation stems from elevated CPU voltage and active cores.
I think a 360AIO would perform optimally if installed correctly; MSI appears to have problems with it.
Still, running at 90°C under load isn’t entirely negative.
Reaching 100°C marks the point of throttling.
It could be beneficial to start with stock settings and compare your maximum overclock to observe any noticeable improvements in gameplay.
Be mindful of the placebo effect.

C
Creepermunch
Junior Member
3
12-07-2020, 10:16 PM
#7
If I remove the overclock, the FPS become unstable in games like PUGG. But I notice something off with the BIOS settings. I read a review about the MSI Mag 360R and it showed the 9900K reaching max 74 to 76C on full load at the CENIMA bench R6. Also, sometimes when I set it to stock, the temperatures go up because the Z490 mobos tend to increase voltage on their own.
C
Creepermunch
12-07-2020, 10:16 PM #7

If I remove the overclock, the FPS become unstable in games like PUGG. But I notice something off with the BIOS settings. I read a review about the MSI Mag 360R and it showed the 9900K reaching max 74 to 76C on full load at the CENIMA bench R6. Also, sometimes when I set it to stock, the temperatures go up because the Z490 mobos tend to increase voltage on their own.

B
bmarzano
Senior Member
449
12-09-2020, 08:03 PM
#8
It’s typical for temperatures to rise sharply when you increase a CPU’s clock speed. Consider the tip of your pinky finger—now imagine flipping a switch and delivering 150 Watts straight through it. It’s impossible to dissipate that much heat in such a tiny component. These sudden temperature spikes happen because of the intense power being applied.

Some Intel 10th Gen CPUs reach their limits around 5.0 GHz. To run them stably at this speed, the voltage must increase significantly, which generates more heat. Your current temperatures are acceptable. To achieve lower temperatures, you should reduce your CPU’s speed from 5.1 GHz back to 5.0 GHz. The small difference of 100 MHz can still impact heat output if the voltage needs a larger jump to maintain stability at 5.1 GHz.

Certain motherboards allow you to boost any voltage set to Auto in the BIOS. Use HWiNFO to check the actual SA and VCCIO voltages. Make sure BCLK isn’t being overclocked, as enabling BCLK adaptive voltage might not be necessary.
B
bmarzano
12-09-2020, 08:03 PM #8

It’s typical for temperatures to rise sharply when you increase a CPU’s clock speed. Consider the tip of your pinky finger—now imagine flipping a switch and delivering 150 Watts straight through it. It’s impossible to dissipate that much heat in such a tiny component. These sudden temperature spikes happen because of the intense power being applied.

Some Intel 10th Gen CPUs reach their limits around 5.0 GHz. To run them stably at this speed, the voltage must increase significantly, which generates more heat. Your current temperatures are acceptable. To achieve lower temperatures, you should reduce your CPU’s speed from 5.1 GHz back to 5.0 GHz. The small difference of 100 MHz can still impact heat output if the voltage needs a larger jump to maintain stability at 5.1 GHz.

Certain motherboards allow you to boost any voltage set to Auto in the BIOS. Use HWiNFO to check the actual SA and VCCIO voltages. Make sure BCLK isn’t being overclocked, as enabling BCLK adaptive voltage might not be necessary.

R
155
12-10-2020, 03:50 AM
#9
I checked your remark about the cooler and found it interesting. It's quite shocking how much this product falls short compared to some 240mm AIOs. I expected it wouldn't work out due to this issue.
R
ReisingerJocke
12-10-2020, 03:50 AM #9

I checked your remark about the cooler and found it interesting. It's quite shocking how much this product falls short compared to some 240mm AIOs. I expected it wouldn't work out due to this issue.

B
Banana_Mann
Member
165
12-10-2020, 04:53 AM
#10
The performance isn't exceptional, but my concern relates to how long this cooler will last. The pump is located in the radiator, slightly off-center, on all Coreliquid models except K and S. Considering what we already understand about preventing air from entering the pump... the user has a 360mm unit, and there are only two possible ways to install it.
B
Banana_Mann
12-10-2020, 04:53 AM #10

The performance isn't exceptional, but my concern relates to how long this cooler will last. The pump is located in the radiator, slightly off-center, on all Coreliquid models except K and S. Considering what we already understand about preventing air from entering the pump... the user has a 360mm unit, and there are only two possible ways to install it.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next