F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop High temperatures for R5 3600 model

High temperatures for R5 3600 model

High temperatures for R5 3600 model

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
T
thingul
Member
136
09-27-2019, 03:10 PM
#11
Stock cooler performed poorly, maintaining 50-60°C during idle, now it stays around 30-40°C. During gaming sessions, temperatures reached 85-90°C, but dropped to 60-70°C or higher under heavy load. I tried changing settings in the Gigabyte Smart Fan menu, but even at max speed it doesn’t cool effectively—often hitting 95°C immediately. The fan spins up to about 2000 RPM, which is the limit.
T
thingul
09-27-2019, 03:10 PM #11

Stock cooler performed poorly, maintaining 50-60°C during idle, now it stays around 30-40°C. During gaming sessions, temperatures reached 85-90°C, but dropped to 60-70°C or higher under heavy load. I tried changing settings in the Gigabyte Smart Fan menu, but even at max speed it doesn’t cool effectively—often hitting 95°C immediately. The fan spins up to about 2000 RPM, which is the limit.

G
GGlobato
Member
176
09-27-2019, 10:35 PM
#12
Yeah, the included Arctic MX5 paste.
G
GGlobato
09-27-2019, 10:35 PM #12

Yeah, the included Arctic MX5 paste.

B
220
09-29-2019, 12:00 AM
#13
Begin with underclocking. The scent resembles the common problem on Gigabyte boards where all components are excessively overclocked.
B
BlueSkyHorizon
09-29-2019, 12:00 AM #13

Begin with underclocking. The scent resembles the common problem on Gigabyte boards where all components are excessively overclocked.

E
ErenKartal
Member
161
09-29-2019, 01:15 AM
#14
This Gigabyte model is known for its high initial voltage. Adjust the Vcore to around 1.325. Updated June 17, 2020 by TofuHaroto
E
ErenKartal
09-29-2019, 01:15 AM #14

This Gigabyte model is known for its high initial voltage. Adjust the Vcore to around 1.325. Updated June 17, 2020 by TofuHaroto

J
jackster770
Member
139
09-29-2019, 09:40 AM
#15
Interesting points. You didn’t accidentally overvolt anything, but the gigabyte setting might be affecting everything by default. Regarding undervolting in BIOS, I can help guide you through the process carefully. Just let me know your system model and BIOS version if you’d like specific steps.
J
jackster770
09-29-2019, 09:40 AM #15

Interesting points. You didn’t accidentally overvolt anything, but the gigabyte setting might be affecting everything by default. Regarding undervolting in BIOS, I can help guide you through the process carefully. Just let me know your system model and BIOS version if you’d like specific steps.

L
Leyhaya
Posting Freak
801
10-13-2019, 04:03 AM
#16
Run Ryzen Master, set negative offsets as needed.
L
Leyhaya
10-13-2019, 04:03 AM #16

Run Ryzen Master, set negative offsets as needed.

1
123francesca
Junior Member
6
10-15-2019, 03:48 AM
#17
I adjusted Peak Core Voltage to 1.325 and it increased to 105°C, which isn’t ideal. It seems I made a mistake. The vcore setting isn’t listed in Ryzen Master. I changed the Dynamic Vcore in BIOS, starting with -0.050V and now at -0.150V, staying within 86°C limits. The full-load voltage is now 1.32V, which is improving. In Ryzen Master it now displays 1.32V at full load—previously it was 1.25V. The numbers are getting closer. How low should I go? Is this affecting performance? Reddit suggests lowering it to 1.025V for better temps (~68°C) and slightly lower scores, but I’m not sure if that’s right for my setup.
1
123francesca
10-15-2019, 03:48 AM #17

I adjusted Peak Core Voltage to 1.325 and it increased to 105°C, which isn’t ideal. It seems I made a mistake. The vcore setting isn’t listed in Ryzen Master. I changed the Dynamic Vcore in BIOS, starting with -0.050V and now at -0.150V, staying within 86°C limits. The full-load voltage is now 1.32V, which is improving. In Ryzen Master it now displays 1.32V at full load—previously it was 1.25V. The numbers are getting closer. How low should I go? Is this affecting performance? Reddit suggests lowering it to 1.025V for better temps (~68°C) and slightly lower scores, but I’m not sure if that’s right for my setup.

C
ChazmanC98
Member
207
10-15-2019, 07:36 PM
#18
That sounds good, yes. Also, 4.2 is single core turbo. You won't see that on all cores at the same time. Not how it works
C
ChazmanC98
10-15-2019, 07:36 PM #18

That sounds good, yes. Also, 4.2 is single core turbo. You won't see that on all cores at the same time. Not how it works

J
JBSlayerr
Junior Member
12
10-15-2019, 07:57 PM
#19
I understand your setup. Using 1.025V is fine, and I'm glad it won't damage anything. Regarding your question, when you enable Manual mode, the voltage is fixed at 1.025V, and the maximum clock speed remains at 3.6 GHz regardless of whether you have a single core or more. You can't change the 4.2 GHz setting—it stays at that level even in Manual mode.
J
JBSlayerr
10-15-2019, 07:57 PM #19

I understand your setup. Using 1.025V is fine, and I'm glad it won't damage anything. Regarding your question, when you enable Manual mode, the voltage is fixed at 1.025V, and the maximum clock speed remains at 3.6 GHz regardless of whether you have a single core or more. You can't change the 4.2 GHz setting—it stays at that level even in Manual mode.

H
Hybrid_Lava
Junior Member
45
10-17-2019, 09:01 AM
#20
1.025 is completely secure. High voltage won't harm anything. The worst case is a freeze, requiring you to force a reboot to increase the voltage. Regarding RM, I'm not sure why the turbo feature is turned off. You might need a separate discussion for that.
H
Hybrid_Lava
10-17-2019, 09:01 AM #20

1.025 is completely secure. High voltage won't harm anything. The worst case is a freeze, requiring you to force a reboot to increase the voltage. Regarding RM, I'm not sure why the turbo feature is turned off. You might need a separate discussion for that.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next