Here we are discussing "Battlefield Hardline."
Here we are discussing "Battlefield Hardline."
Check the discussions in these threads and the linked video.
If you value my take, I think Battlefield 4 feels more like a straightforward version of Battlefield 4 with a questionable theme shift (military-style weapons and helicopters clashing head-on with police?). The ground vehicles are mostly armored vans or muscle cars, with some motorcycles thrown in. The gunplay and mechanics are quite alike, making it hard to see why you'd choose this over Battlefield 4. In reality, I’d say Battlefield 4 is too similar to Battlefield 3 to make a strong case for both. That said, there might be subtle differences I’m missing. Overall, it seems Battlefield is moving toward the repetitive release pattern seen in Call of Duty, releasing new titles yearly with DLC until the next game—something that’s becoming increasingly noticeable. I’d probably avoid both if I were you.
That was the most bothersome individual I've ever heard. What truly brings joy would be something different. Although many complain about bf4, it actually functions well for the majority. And regarding this game not being up to scruff? Everyone is making assumptions based on what's essentially a top-tier title.
Significantly simpler to execute compared to BF4 with a lot of rubber banding