Help Overclocking my I5-6600K
Help Overclocking my I5-6600K
Hey everyone, I just wrapped up a build and decided to push my CPU further. It seems like the constant frame drops in BF1 have me suspecting an overclock issue. My CPU usage stays around 80-90% most of the time, especially when I’m running Conquest. I own a solid graphics card (GTX 1070) and am currently playing at 1080p, but plan to upgrade to 1440p soon. I have a water cooler, the Enermax Liqmax II 240, which should help me reach a good overclock level. I’ve done some research, but the BIOS feels a bit confusing. I’m unsure whether to adjust the BCLK or the Ratio since they seem to work differently. Also, people warn about changing the voltage—every time I hover over it, I get nervous. The BIOS has an “EZ” overclock option, but I prefer having more control myself. Any advice would be really helpful, just need some guidance on where to begin. Thanks!
Leave bclk untouched and just raise the ratio. If the CPU starts acting unstable, slightly increase the voltage. Test overclocking using prime95 version 26.6 exclusively. Also, use speedfan to monitor temperatures. Maintain under 80 degrees.
The CLC won't match the cooling you'd get from a good air cooler. The Noctua NH-D15 outperforms it by 2.2°C under load, and it's roughly ten times noisier.
I'm not very experienced with BF1... I should look into whether it's CPU or GPU focused. YouTube reviews can be annoying (especially when the music is dropped), but here I see 80-100 fps.
ASUS ROG GTX 1070 + i5 6600k DX12 benchmarks | Ultra Graphics | 1080p 144hz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHSJUzoq93w
Consider using GeForce Experience to adjust game settings.
For learning about overclocking, check this guide: http://www.overclock.net/t/1570313/skyla...statistics
Same motherboard as yours was used, but I managed to overclock the 6600k to 4.6 ghz with adaptive voltage at 1.215. The LLC is set to auto by default. Real-time voltages vary between a maximum of 1.22 and 1.24. When using manual mode, the voltage fluctuated unpredictably beyond the settings. If you're experiencing the same issue, try switching to adaptive mode and adjusting the max voltage accordingly. In manual mode, it didn't have any restrictions. Also noticed that CPU-Z provided less accurate readings compared to HWMonitor. I think 1.35 is the safe upper limit for air coolers, while 1.4 to 1.45 is suitable for water coolers, even for regular use. Since your temps stay below 75-80°C, you're all set. Happy overclocking!
Have the same motherboard as before, but I overclocked my 6600k to 4.6 ghz with adaptive 1.215 voltage and auto LLC setting. Voltages in real time go up to a maximum of 1.22 to 1.24. When using manual mode, voltages fluctuate widely beyond the settings. If others see similar issues, switch to adaptive mode and adjust the max voltage accordingly. In manual mode there was no clear limit. I noticed CPU-Z gave less accurate readings than HWMonitor. For air coolers, 1.35 is the recommended max, and for water coolers, 1.4-1.45 is safe even for regular use. Your temps are under 75-80°C. Happy overclocking!
You wish to leave bclk unchanged and just raise the ratio. If instability appears, slightly increase the voltage. Test overclocking using prime95 version 26.6 exclusively. Also, speedfan should monitor temperatures. Maintain a temperature below 80 degrees.
This indicates the minimum amount the motherboard permits for increases. Understanding the details of your motherboard and CPU plays a role in achieving optimal configurations.
That means the minimum increase the motherboard permits. Understanding the details of your motherboard and CPU is essential for achieving optimal settings. I appreciate what you're saying, I've certainly done thorough research before starting any modifications. I intend to overclock as soon as I return home later today. A suitable initial test would be increasing the clock speed to 3.8-4 at stock voltage, running benchmarks, and then gradually raising the voltage if stability is maintained. Does this approach seem reasonable?
I believe it's best to first choose a target clock and then experiment with voltages, for instance if you aim for an overclock of 4600, begin with a voltage around 1.275 and test various settings. This approach ensures stability through stress tests, as gradually increasing the clock speed without raising the stock voltage could be very time-consuming. I wouldn't suggest prime 95, as it pushes the limits too much and risks damaging the CPU. Instead, try running AIDA64 and RealBench for about half an hour to assess stability before proceeding with overnight stress tests for your "optimal" settings. RealBench tends to be more forgiving, so starting there might be a better choice.
I believe it’s best to first pick a target clock and then experiment with voltages. For instance, if you aim for a final overclock of 4600, start with a voltage around 1.275 and test. This approach helps ensure stability through stress tests, which could otherwise take a long time if you gradually increase the clock speed without raising the stock voltage. I wouldn’t suggest Prime 95—it puts excessive strain and risks damaging your CPU. Instead, try running AIDA64 and RealBench for about an hour to assess stability before attempting overnight stress tests for your "optimal" settings. RealBench proved more forgiving, so it might be a safer starting point.