F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming GTX 960 shows no visual difference when switching between low and ultra settings.

GTX 960 shows no visual difference when switching between low and ultra settings.

GTX 960 shows no visual difference when switching between low and ultra settings.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
D
Dubstep_cat3
Junior Member
21
07-29-2016, 05:04 AM
#1
Hey everyone, I just got a MSI GTX 960 4GB which is a solid upgrade over my old GTX 650. After installing it, updating drivers and configuring DirectX, I tried out Battlefield 3 to check the performance. I expected smoother frames, but the results were similar to what I saw on medium settings—around 40-50 FPS. When I played at low settings, it matched my old GTX 650’s around 45-50 FPS, and at ultra settings, it stayed near 45-50 FPS as well. My system specs include an AMD FX-8320 Black Edition 3.5 GHz cooler, 16GB DDR3 RAM, a MSI GAMING GTX 960 4GB motherboard, a 500W PSU, and the CPU running at 3800 MHz with a fan speed of 3333 RPM. The GPU is at 49% usage, with 3505 MHz clock and 49% VRAM utilization. At full CPU frequency (3800 MHz), the CPU stays cool at 46°C, and the GPU runs at 1329 MHz with 67% usage. I recorded everything using MSI’s app and Shadowplay to capture all data, but I’m not sure if these numbers were influenced by the recording or anything else. Let me know your thoughts!
D
Dubstep_cat3
07-29-2016, 05:04 AM #1

Hey everyone, I just got a MSI GTX 960 4GB which is a solid upgrade over my old GTX 650. After installing it, updating drivers and configuring DirectX, I tried out Battlefield 3 to check the performance. I expected smoother frames, but the results were similar to what I saw on medium settings—around 40-50 FPS. When I played at low settings, it matched my old GTX 650’s around 45-50 FPS, and at ultra settings, it stayed near 45-50 FPS as well. My system specs include an AMD FX-8320 Black Edition 3.5 GHz cooler, 16GB DDR3 RAM, a MSI GAMING GTX 960 4GB motherboard, a 500W PSU, and the CPU running at 3800 MHz with a fan speed of 3333 RPM. The GPU is at 49% usage, with 3505 MHz clock and 49% VRAM utilization. At full CPU frequency (3800 MHz), the CPU stays cool at 46°C, and the GPU runs at 1329 MHz with 67% usage. I recorded everything using MSI’s app and Shadowplay to capture all data, but I’m not sure if these numbers were influenced by the recording or anything else. Let me know your thoughts!

K
kelusky101
Member
181
07-30-2016, 03:37 PM
#2
Make sure your highest refresh rate isn’t set too high in the game options or within the MSI gaming app.
K
kelusky101
07-30-2016, 03:37 PM #2

Make sure your highest refresh rate isn’t set too high in the game options or within the MSI gaming app.

P
PottuJ_
Junior Member
46
08-03-2016, 09:59 AM
#3
Your GPU performance dropped significantly, falling from 67% to 29%. It looks like there’s a major slowdown or issue. Your GPU settings might be restricting frame rates. Review your graphical interface.
P
PottuJ_
08-03-2016, 09:59 AM #3

Your GPU performance dropped significantly, falling from 67% to 29%. It looks like there’s a major slowdown or issue. Your GPU settings might be restricting frame rates. Review your graphical interface.

B
Bartekdwarf
Posting Freak
791
08-10-2016, 06:06 PM
#4
It seems the hardware limiting your performance might be the processor itself. When I first played bf4, I used an FX 8350 paired with a GTX 780, achieving about 50 frames per second across most settings with roughly 65-70% CPU usage. Switching to an i5 4690k improved my frame rate significantly, reaching around 80-100 FPS consistently during gameplay.
B
Bartekdwarf
08-10-2016, 06:06 PM #4

It seems the hardware limiting your performance might be the processor itself. When I first played bf4, I used an FX 8350 paired with a GTX 780, achieving about 50 frames per second across most settings with roughly 65-70% CPU usage. Switching to an i5 4690k improved my frame rate significantly, reaching around 80-100 FPS consistently during gameplay.

M
mcDavoz
Senior Member
544
08-20-2016, 12:17 PM
#5
This machine is quite recent, purchased just two weeks ago. Before that, I had an I3-3220 at 3.3 GHz, and running it at low settings gave me higher FPS than now. The FX 8320 seems significantly more powerful compared to the I3-3220.
M
mcDavoz
08-20-2016, 12:17 PM #5

This machine is quite recent, purchased just two weeks ago. Before that, I had an I3-3220 at 3.3 GHz, and running it at low settings gave me higher FPS than now. The FX 8320 seems significantly more powerful compared to the I3-3220.

I
icefreezjr
Member
192
08-27-2016, 05:02 AM
#6
It seems quite sensible. Running at lower settings typically reduces rendering load or quality, which aligns with using fewer resources. This makes sense as a logical approach to performance management.
I
icefreezjr
08-27-2016, 05:02 AM #6

It seems quite sensible. Running at lower settings typically reduces rendering load or quality, which aligns with using fewer resources. This makes sense as a logical approach to performance management.

B
B_Mathias99
Member
70
08-27-2016, 05:32 AM
#7
And playing other titles (such as War Thunder and Need for Speed: Most Wanted) gave me much higher FPS compared to my previous graphics card.
B
B_Mathias99
08-27-2016, 05:32 AM #7

And playing other titles (such as War Thunder and Need for Speed: Most Wanted) gave me much higher FPS compared to my previous graphics card.

Y
YoDryZee_YT
Junior Member
5
08-27-2016, 11:32 AM
#8
Identify performance issues with your GTX960 graphics card.
Y
YoDryZee_YT
08-27-2016, 11:32 AM #8

Identify performance issues with your GTX960 graphics card.

G
gribouille64
Member
100
08-29-2016, 12:14 PM
#9
I'm confident it's superior to the i3, based on what I've seen. I had a more powerful CPU and a better GPU, which led to similar results you're experiencing now. Maybe a fresh Windows installation could resolve driver issues—though that would be quite a hassle.
G
gribouille64
08-29-2016, 12:14 PM #9

I'm confident it's superior to the i3, based on what I've seen. I had a more powerful CPU and a better GPU, which led to similar results you're experiencing now. Maybe a fresh Windows installation could resolve driver issues—though that would be quite a hassle.

E
ExPrince1
Junior Member
4
08-29-2016, 08:37 PM
#10
The unusual aspect is that it works only with BF3; other titles show major FPS gains, while BF3 doesn't.
E
ExPrince1
08-29-2016, 08:37 PM #10

The unusual aspect is that it works only with BF3; other titles show major FPS gains, while BF3 doesn't.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next