F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Gaming rig vs new every day computer

Gaming rig vs new every day computer

Gaming rig vs new every day computer

W
Willaem
Member
Find
77
03-15-2016, 12:22 AM
#1
It's fascinating how quickly these small components operate. Regular computing tasks run at an average of 18.5wh, compared to roughly 150wh when idle. In the multicore benchmark, performance drops to around 90w versus about 320w.
Reply
Reply
W
Willaem
03-15-2016, 12:22 AM #1

It's fascinating how quickly these small components operate. Regular computing tasks run at an average of 18.5wh, compared to roughly 150wh when idle. In the multicore benchmark, performance drops to around 90w versus about 320w.

Reply
Reply
K
kittyheartsMC
Member
Find
63
04-01-2016, 10:32 AM
#2
The most significant and crucial distinction for players is the bright flashing indicators that gamers insist a machine needs to function properly.
Reply
Reply
K
kittyheartsMC
04-01-2016, 10:32 AM #2

The most significant and crucial distinction for players is the bright flashing indicators that gamers insist a machine needs to function properly.

Reply
Reply
A
andy12973
Member
Find
53
04-20-2016, 11:35 AM
#3
Some GPUs remain idle with minimal power consumption, which isn't helpful. The AMD chiplet CPU design also struggles with power efficiency compared to performance. Still, it's not unexpected that a mobile-focused platform uses less power than a desktop one during light usage. Who would have imagined? How many frames per second does this efficient setup deliver in similar settings? You decide based on your needs, and it's good we offer such options.
Reply
Reply
A
andy12973
04-20-2016, 11:35 AM #3

Some GPUs remain idle with minimal power consumption, which isn't helpful. The AMD chiplet CPU design also struggles with power efficiency compared to performance. Still, it's not unexpected that a mobile-focused platform uses less power than a desktop one during light usage. Who would have imagined? How many frames per second does this efficient setup deliver in similar settings? You decide based on your needs, and it's good we offer such options.

Reply
Reply
S
spike365
Junior Member
Find
35
04-20-2016, 05:40 PM
#4
I usually play around 0-5 hours each week. Performance in Photoshop, Lightroom, browsers, and office apps feels almost the same. FPS per watt for demanding games is roughly a tenth of what it is for lighter titles, around 1/10 the speed with 1/10 the power. Lighter games like Minecraft or Roblox offer 3-5 times more FPS per watt. Right now I can manage about 9 hours of use while losing power, without needing to switch to the house batteries—those are set aside for the fridge, freezer, garage door, and a few lights.
Reply
Reply
S
spike365
04-20-2016, 05:40 PM #4

I usually play around 0-5 hours each week. Performance in Photoshop, Lightroom, browsers, and office apps feels almost the same. FPS per watt for demanding games is roughly a tenth of what it is for lighter titles, around 1/10 the speed with 1/10 the power. Lighter games like Minecraft or Roblox offer 3-5 times more FPS per watt. Right now I can manage about 9 hours of use while losing power, without needing to switch to the house batteries—those are set aside for the fridge, freezer, garage door, and a few lights.

Reply
Reply