F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Game FPS suffers from weak monitoring systems.

Game FPS suffers from weak monitoring systems.

Game FPS suffers from weak monitoring systems.

A
AdamKoudy
Senior Member
740
12-21-2016, 08:25 AM
#1
I added SweetFX and upgraded to the newest release. Still facing issues keeping the game running smoothly at 60fps consistently. I’m currently using ultra settings, 1440p resolution, and a crossfire r9 290x with 4690k performance. It seems I should be easily reaching over 100fps, but the visuals don’t appear much better.
A
AdamKoudy
12-21-2016, 08:25 AM #1

I added SweetFX and upgraded to the newest release. Still facing issues keeping the game running smoothly at 60fps consistently. I’m currently using ultra settings, 1440p resolution, and a crossfire r9 290x with 4690k performance. It seems I should be easily reaching over 100fps, but the visuals don’t appear much better.

H
horseygirl101
Member
120
12-21-2016, 09:00 AM
#2
Watch_Dogs stands out as the least efficient game I've encountered, far surpassing even World of Warcraft in terms of optimization. It feels like a significant waste of resources.
H
horseygirl101
12-21-2016, 09:00 AM #2

Watch_Dogs stands out as the least efficient game I've encountered, far surpassing even World of Warcraft in terms of optimization. It feels like a significant waste of resources.

N
nexusRawr
Member
198
12-21-2016, 12:12 PM
#3
It seems the game wasn't well-suited for PC and lacked good optimization on AMD hardware.
N
nexusRawr
12-21-2016, 12:12 PM #3

It seems the game wasn't well-suited for PC and lacked good optimization on AMD hardware.

C
Cqristopher
Member
241
12-23-2016, 01:58 PM
#4
Game visuals are quite good.
C
Cqristopher
12-23-2016, 01:58 PM #4

Game visuals are quite good.

E
EpicElite346
Junior Member
9
12-25-2016, 01:08 AM
#5
WoW funktioniert auch ohne mehrkernunterstützung, das ist okay.
E
EpicElite346
12-25-2016, 01:08 AM #5

WoW funktioniert auch ohne mehrkernunterstützung, das ist okay.

C
Clowngirl12345
Junior Member
8
01-02-2017, 10:38 AM
#6
It remains highly inefficient. Most people overlook it because they rely on it. Note: Beta testers have observed increased frame rates after the new file system was added. This highlights its issues in real-world use.
C
Clowngirl12345
01-02-2017, 10:38 AM #6

It remains highly inefficient. Most people overlook it because they rely on it. Note: Beta testers have observed increased frame rates after the new file system was added. This highlights its issues in real-world use.

I
iitzsolid
Member
79
01-06-2017, 06:07 PM
#7
You anticipated the usual warnings. It’s wise to learn more about the games first.
I
iitzsolid
01-06-2017, 06:07 PM #7

You anticipated the usual warnings. It’s wise to learn more about the games first.

S
Sasix
Junior Member
30
01-10-2017, 04:37 PM
#8
It performs better with a Core i7-4770K and a high-end Nvidia graphics card. I achieve over 60 FPS at maximum settings, but only in 1080p resolution.
S
Sasix
01-10-2017, 04:37 PM #8

It performs better with a Core i7-4770K and a high-end Nvidia graphics card. I achieve over 60 FPS at maximum settings, but only in 1080p resolution.

S
SleazyCraft
Junior Member
20
01-10-2017, 05:01 PM
#9
It's a solid concept, but the publishers are terrible.
S
SleazyCraft
01-10-2017, 05:01 PM #9

It's a solid concept, but the publishers are terrible.

D
Diego097
Member
101
01-12-2017, 05:51 AM
#10
1080p is straightforward to push to its limits, while 1440p presents a different challenge altogether
D
Diego097
01-12-2017, 05:51 AM #10

1080p is straightforward to push to its limits, while 1440p presents a different challenge altogether