F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Fix: Fallout 76 performance issues resolved

Fix: Fallout 76 performance issues resolved

Fix: Fallout 76 performance issues resolved

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
N
NetherBlitz300
Junior Member
46
10-12-2017, 12:43 PM
#1
Greetings, everyone,

I’m having difficulty with Fallout 76 and consistently experience a jerky performance. It's the only game I play where my frame rate frequently fluctuates, leading to problems.

My system specifications are as follows:
Processor: FX-9590
Graphics Card: XFX - Radeon R9 290X 4 GB Double Dissipation
Power Supply: EVGA 1000W 80+ Gold
Memory: G.Skill - Ares Series 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR3-1600
Motherboard: GA-990FXA-UD3 ATX AM3+
N
NetherBlitz300
10-12-2017, 12:43 PM #1

Greetings, everyone,

I’m having difficulty with Fallout 76 and consistently experience a jerky performance. It's the only game I play where my frame rate frequently fluctuates, leading to problems.

My system specifications are as follows:
Processor: FX-9590
Graphics Card: XFX - Radeon R9 290X 4 GB Double Dissipation
Power Supply: EVGA 1000W 80+ Gold
Memory: G.Skill - Ares Series 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR3-1600
Motherboard: GA-990FXA-UD3 ATX AM3+

P
Papyrule
Senior Member
560
10-17-2017, 03:22 AM
#2
Frame rate fluctuations aren’t due to insufficient processing power; if the computer lacks sufficient strength, the frame rate will decrease temporarily when demanding visuals are displayed. However, these drops can originate from world loading processes (attempting to defragment your hard drive), an inefficient engine for handling streaming elements—often a factor in games developed by Bethesda—or overheating of the graphics card or central processing unit. Monitor temperatures alongside resource utilization.
P
Papyrule
10-17-2017, 03:22 AM #2

Frame rate fluctuations aren’t due to insufficient processing power; if the computer lacks sufficient strength, the frame rate will decrease temporarily when demanding visuals are displayed. However, these drops can originate from world loading processes (attempting to defragment your hard drive), an inefficient engine for handling streaming elements—often a factor in games developed by Bethesda—or overheating of the graphics card or central processing unit. Monitor temperatures alongside resource utilization.

L
lizzard89
Senior Member
707
10-24-2017, 09:18 PM
#3
To stabilize the image, aim for a frame rate matching your display’s refresh rate – typically 60Hz. Utilize Rivatuner Statistics and configure an FPS cap of 60 frames per second.
L
lizzard89
10-24-2017, 09:18 PM #3

To stabilize the image, aim for a frame rate matching your display’s refresh rate – typically 60Hz. Utilize Rivatuner Statistics and configure an FPS cap of 60 frames per second.

D
Darth_Bull
Junior Member
23
10-26-2017, 12:37 AM
#4
Likely due to your processor being somewhat old.
D
Darth_Bull
10-26-2017, 12:37 AM #4

Likely due to your processor being somewhat old.

S
Skotcher
Member
182
10-26-2017, 06:30 AM
#5
It's likely that your central processing unit is somewhat old.

Indeed, regarding overall performance across multiple cores, the 9590 functions similarly to a Ryzen 1400 with eight threads – which is perfectly adequate.
S
Skotcher
10-26-2017, 06:30 AM #5

It's likely that your central processing unit is somewhat old.

Indeed, regarding overall performance across multiple cores, the 9590 functions similarly to a Ryzen 1400 with eight threads – which is perfectly adequate.

H
Hazrod
Junior Member
7
10-31-2017, 03:12 AM
#6
Optimize performance by synchronizing your frame rate with your display’s update frequency – typically 60Hz; use Rivatuner and establish an FPS cap of 60 frames per second. If you're not familiar with Rivatuner, does it function similarly to Guru3D?
H
Hazrod
10-31-2017, 03:12 AM #6

Optimize performance by synchronizing your frame rate with your display’s update frequency – typically 60Hz; use Rivatuner and establish an FPS cap of 60 frames per second. If you're not familiar with Rivatuner, does it function similarly to Guru3D?

R
Relo_273
Member
169
10-31-2017, 03:51 AM
#7
To optimize your performance, attempt to synchronize your frame rate with your monitor’s refresh rate – typically 60Hz. Download Rivatuner and configure the maximum FPS limit to 60 frames per second.

If you're not familiar with Rivatuner, is it equivalent to Guru3D?

I understand that Guru3D is primarily a website offering various software applications; Rivatuner appears to be one of those programs hosted on the site.
R
Relo_273
10-31-2017, 03:51 AM #7

To optimize your performance, attempt to synchronize your frame rate with your monitor’s refresh rate – typically 60Hz. Download Rivatuner and configure the maximum FPS limit to 60 frames per second.

If you're not familiar with Rivatuner, is it equivalent to Guru3D?

I understand that Guru3D is primarily a website offering various software applications; Rivatuner appears to be one of those programs hosted on the site.

A
amandabuddy
Member
56
10-31-2017, 06:47 AM
#8
User1991:
Phazoner:
Experiment with fixing the frame rate to match your monitor’s refresh speed – typically 60Hz; download Rivatuner and configure a maximum FPS of 60.
If you're not familiar with Rivatuner, is it identical to Guru3D?
I believe Guru3D is a website that offers various programs, and Rivatuner is one of them.
I’ll give it a shot and report back my findings.
A
amandabuddy
10-31-2017, 06:47 AM #8

User1991:
Phazoner:
Experiment with fixing the frame rate to match your monitor’s refresh speed – typically 60Hz; download Rivatuner and configure a maximum FPS of 60.
If you're not familiar with Rivatuner, is it identical to Guru3D?
I believe Guru3D is a website that offers various programs, and Rivatuner is one of them.
I’ll give it a shot and report back my findings.

F
FoxPlayz134
Junior Member
4
10-31-2017, 11:31 AM
#9
It’s incorrect. The 9590 performs significantly slower in terms of instructions per cycle and is, essentially, a four-core processor. Within Cinebench, the Ryzen 1400 demonstrates approximately 1.2x the speed of the 9590 on single threads, and it effectively operates in multi-threaded real-world applications.

Specifically, in F4 with an RTX 980Ti, a FX9590 achieves roughly 58FPS, matching the performance of a sixth-generation Intel i3. The FX series utilizes a fundamentally flawed architecture that unnecessarily restricts core resources by forcing them to share data.
F
FoxPlayz134
10-31-2017, 11:31 AM #9

It’s incorrect. The 9590 performs significantly slower in terms of instructions per cycle and is, essentially, a four-core processor. Within Cinebench, the Ryzen 1400 demonstrates approximately 1.2x the speed of the 9590 on single threads, and it effectively operates in multi-threaded real-world applications.

Specifically, in F4 with an RTX 980Ti, a FX9590 achieves roughly 58FPS, matching the performance of a sixth-generation Intel i3. The FX series utilizes a fundamentally flawed architecture that unnecessarily restricts core resources by forcing them to share data.

F
fibifelise
Member
233
10-31-2017, 08:20 PM
#10
During gameplay, I experience frame rate variations ranging from sixty to drops of forty-five, thirty, and decreasing further from fifty down to just five based on whether enemies appear visually. Sadly, Fallout suffers from numerous bugs and employs the same engine as Fallout 4, though it’s performing very poorly. Upon the release of the latest processor generation, I plan to upgrade to a 3000 series system.
F
fibifelise
10-31-2017, 08:20 PM #10

During gameplay, I experience frame rate variations ranging from sixty to drops of forty-five, thirty, and decreasing further from fifty down to just five based on whether enemies appear visually. Sadly, Fallout suffers from numerous bugs and employs the same engine as Fallout 4, though it’s performing very poorly. Upon the release of the latest processor generation, I plan to upgrade to a 3000 series system.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next