Feedback regarding this design.
Feedback regarding this design.
Darkbreeze :
That was the second thing I picked on, right after the BeQuiet budget cooler that could never handle that CPU well even at the stock configuration much less if they decide to overclock at all.
I thought it would be decent enough for stock operations, no?
I mean, it's not great by any means, but I've seen people using a 212EVO on an 8700K at stock .... and the ShadowRock2 is a bit better, is it not? Or am I thinking of soemthing else entirely?
**EDIT** Nevermind, it's a
little
bit better than a 212EVO, but not by much. 1-2'c generally.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/beQu...k_2/6.html
Im not to knowledgeable on parts , thats why some thing my not go well together, also why i came here to ask for advice
BeQuiet Shadow Rock 2 coolers are generally considered decent for stock cooling, though they aren't the best performers. They prioritize quiet operation by maxing out their fans at lower RPMs, which can result in slightly reduced airflow compared to some competitors like Noctua or Thermalright. While they may achieve lower noise levels at certain speeds, they don’t always match the airflow capabilities of other brands. The primary advantage of a BeQuiet cooler is its quieter operation and aesthetic appearance. However, for demanding workloads or overclocking, there are typically better cooling solutions available at similar price points. Comparing them to coolers like the 212EVO, the Shadow Rock 2 offers only a marginal improvement – perhaps 1-2°C in most cases. Noctua fans, known for their quietness and airflow efficiency, consistently outperform BeQuiet’s fans at comparable speeds. Thermalright coolers also offer competitive performance. Ultimately, the BeQuiet Shadow Rock 2 is a reasonable choice for stock cooling where noise reduction is a priority, but it's not the top-tier option for enthusiasts seeking maximum performance.
Rewrite the text using different words:
Here’s a revised version of the text, aiming for clarity and flow while maintaining the original information:
This build utilizes several components to create a powerful PC. The core processing unit is an Intel Core i5-9600K 3.7 GHz processor with six cores, costing $249.99 from Walmart. Cooling this processor is handled by an NZXT Kraken X52 liquid cooler priced at $132.37 from OutletPC. The motherboard chosen is an Asus PRIME Z390-A ATX LGA1151 model, available for $175.34 also from OutletPC. Memory consists of 16 GB of Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-2666 RAM ($134.99 at Amazon). Storage includes a Samsung 860 Evo 500GB M.2 SSD ($94.69 from OutletPC) and a Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200RPM hard drive ($59.89 from OutletPC). For graphics, a Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 8 GB WHITE video card is included at $749.99 from Newegg. The case is a Corsair Crystal 570X RGB White ATX Mid Tower case costing $179.99 from Corsair. Powering the system is a Corsair RMx (2018) 650W 80+ Gold certified power supply, priced at $93.98 from Newegg. Additional case fans are included – Corsair HD120 RGB 54.4 CFM fans ($29.18 from OutletPC).
The total cost of this build is approximately $1900.41, including shipping, taxes and any available discounts. Note that the original white RAM was unavailable on PCPP, and a consideration is whether an i7-8700k processor would be a better choice. It’s important to confirm that all components fit within the case and that the 650W power supply provides sufficient wattage for this system.
Darkbreeze :
I don't see any problems with that build either.
is there a real need to swap the i5 9600k for an i7 8700k or i7 9700k? or is the difference too small,
cause there is about a 40-60 $ price gap where i live.
Are you planning to do any heavy multitasking such as encoding, recording, streaming or other simultaneous demanding processes WHILE gaming? If so, then yes, the additional cores of the i7 are worth having. If you will ONLY be gaming or running normal applications, then the i5 is probably plenty.