F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Establish links between Windows and Freena P2P solutions

Establish links between Windows and Freena P2P solutions

Establish links between Windows and Freena P2P solutions

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
G
Girlplaysgame
Junior Member
3
04-20-2023, 05:50 AM
#1
I've been using this server nonstop for three days now and feel like I'm close to the final stretch. The problem is my two systems can't connect directly over Ethernet. I have a 10GB card on my main machine and an Intel X550-T2 on my FREENA. I assigned IPs and tweaked MTU settings, but Windows blocks network access. Files move fine, but traffic goes through a switch and uses the 1GB network. I can ping the NIC addresses and they respond. Both networks share the same /24 subnet—any suggestions?
G
Girlplaysgame
04-20-2023, 05:50 AM #1

I've been using this server nonstop for three days now and feel like I'm close to the final stretch. The problem is my two systems can't connect directly over Ethernet. I have a 10GB card on my main machine and an Intel X550-T2 on my FREENA. I assigned IPs and tweaked MTU settings, but Windows blocks network access. Files move fine, but traffic goes through a switch and uses the 1GB network. I can ping the NIC addresses and they respond. Both networks share the same /24 subnet—any suggestions?

_
_Rickk_
Member
79
04-24-2023, 11:51 AM
#2
You're looking at mapping a drive using the hostname instead of an IP address. That means you're working with Windows' NetBIOS resolution. You should connect the share to the IP address of the freenas server on the 200 subnet. The 200 subnet isn't your primary network—it needs to be isolated and not reachable from outside.
_
_Rickk_
04-24-2023, 11:51 AM #2

You're looking at mapping a drive using the hostname instead of an IP address. That means you're working with Windows' NetBIOS resolution. You should connect the share to the IP address of the freenas server on the 200 subnet. The 200 subnet isn't your primary network—it needs to be isolated and not reachable from outside.

F
Fufuit
Member
174
05-11-2023, 10:57 PM
#3
It looks like performance varies based on the direction of data transfer. On one end, with 6 wd reds, speeds range from 200 to 450MB/s depending on file size. When moving back from Freenas to Windows, it uses the same network and caps at 120MB/s. The 200MB is a subnet connecting the two machines.
F
Fufuit
05-11-2023, 10:57 PM #3

It looks like performance varies based on the direction of data transfer. On one end, with 6 wd reds, speeds range from 200 to 450MB/s depending on file size. When moving back from Freenas to Windows, it uses the same network and caps at 120MB/s. The 200MB is a subnet connecting the two machines.

S
slayer__is
Senior Member
521
05-12-2023, 07:38 AM
#4
Additionally, it could be due to the files, though the speeds appear stable at times. I'm moving my Steam library to the server, which should result in around 130MB/s initially, then a temporary drop below 300KB/s, followed by fluctuations.
S
slayer__is
05-12-2023, 07:38 AM #4

Additionally, it could be due to the files, though the speeds appear stable at times. I'm moving my Steam library to the server, which should result in around 130MB/s initially, then a temporary drop below 300KB/s, followed by fluctuations.

P
paxpax1
Junior Member
36
05-20-2023, 02:00 AM
#5
You can check if the issue exists by turning off another LAN port (leaving just 10GbE active) and retesting the transfer. If speeds remain consistent, the problem likely lies with file size. Very small files will significantly slow down the process compared to transferring larger files continuously.
P
paxpax1
05-20-2023, 02:00 AM #5

You can check if the issue exists by turning off another LAN port (leaving just 10GbE active) and retesting the transfer. If speeds remain consistent, the problem likely lies with file size. Very small files will significantly slow down the process compared to transferring larger files continuously.

P
peter4everpan
Member
235
05-22-2023, 07:37 PM
#6
I performed a disk benchmark using just the p2p subnet, reaching a maximum read speed of 150MB/s. Writes stayed stable at around 620MB/s. It looks quite sluggish when compared to other drives I've tested.
P
peter4everpan
05-22-2023, 07:37 PM #6

I performed a disk benchmark using just the p2p subnet, reaching a maximum read speed of 150MB/s. Writes stayed stable at around 620MB/s. It looks quite sluggish when compared to other drives I've tested.

A
AdamKoudy
Senior Member
740
05-23-2023, 02:36 AM
#7
It's unusual how slow the reads are. In RAID, they expect the opposite. Fast reads but slow writing.
A
AdamKoudy
05-23-2023, 02:36 AM #7

It's unusual how slow the reads are. In RAID, they expect the opposite. Fast reads but slow writing.

C
cooldude99889
Member
179
05-26-2023, 06:33 AM
#8
Just another brief session... writing much quicker now. I’m really trying to figure this out.
C
cooldude99889
05-26-2023, 06:33 AM #8

Just another brief session... writing much quicker now. I’m really trying to figure this out.

T
TheSymbiote
Member
71
05-29-2023, 08:28 PM
#9
Windows 7 Geek
T
TheSymbiote
05-29-2023, 08:28 PM #9

Windows 7 Geek

D
Duderbugz
Junior Member
38
05-30-2023, 01:07 AM
#10
The issue isn't the raid 1 SSD cache, is it? Edit: It doesn't appear to be, this looks similar to a cache-free array.
D
Duderbugz
05-30-2023, 01:07 AM #10

The issue isn't the raid 1 SSD cache, is it? Edit: It doesn't appear to be, this looks similar to a cache-free array.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next