F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Dual rank vs quad rank ddr3?

Dual rank vs quad rank ddr3?

Dual rank vs quad rank ddr3?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
F
FuzzyAJD
Junior Member
21
06-11-2016, 07:55 AM
#11
Are you seeking additional bandwidth for more RAM slots? Do you know how Quad Rank DDR3 compares to Dual Rank or if Quad Rank DDR3 is inferior to DDR4? Ignore IMC stress since you can boost VCCSA through throttling.
F
FuzzyAJD
06-11-2016, 07:55 AM #11

Are you seeking additional bandwidth for more RAM slots? Do you know how Quad Rank DDR3 compares to Dual Rank or if Quad Rank DDR3 is inferior to DDR4? Ignore IMC stress since you can boost VCCSA through throttling.

R
rboy108
Member
166
06-12-2016, 03:55 PM
#12
If you're comfortable with dual rank I, go for it. Don't overcomplicate things with a CPU or chipset that won't make much difference. JMO is the way to go.
R
rboy108
06-12-2016, 03:55 PM #12

If you're comfortable with dual rank I, go for it. Don't overcomplicate things with a CPU or chipset that won't make much difference. JMO is the way to go.

K
Kunall
Member
205
06-16-2016, 08:02 PM
#13
Having additional ranks doesn't expand the data width. The module has a fixed maximum size. Accessing chiplets is slower on a quad-rank setup compared to dual or single ranks, which explains why consumer RAM usually offers one of the other options. If your system is a server, things change because quad-rank provides high capacity and limited motherboard slots—making it a worthwhile choice.
K
Kunall
06-16-2016, 08:02 PM #13

Having additional ranks doesn't expand the data width. The module has a fixed maximum size. Accessing chiplets is slower on a quad-rank setup compared to dual or single ranks, which explains why consumer RAM usually offers one of the other options. If your system is a server, things change because quad-rank provides high capacity and limited motherboard slots—making it a worthwhile choice.

M
MacSolaris
Senior Member
457
06-22-2016, 07:25 PM
#14
By this stage, using 2GB SSDs with 16GB partitions seems unusual and probably outdated tech that needs its speed adjusted to avoid slow performance at 1066 or 800MHz. No surprise why quad-rank isn’t helpful—interesting to learn. As a fun thought, DDR2 might gain from quad-rank, but you’d mostly need it for 8GB or more, except in the very rare 4GB variants.
M
MacSolaris
06-22-2016, 07:25 PM #14

By this stage, using 2GB SSDs with 16GB partitions seems unusual and probably outdated tech that needs its speed adjusted to avoid slow performance at 1066 or 800MHz. No surprise why quad-rank isn’t helpful—interesting to learn. As a fun thought, DDR2 might gain from quad-rank, but you’d mostly need it for 8GB or more, except in the very rare 4GB variants.

H
HaTuYanga
Junior Member
22
06-27-2016, 04:48 AM
#15
Don’t fixate too much on the figures—it’s not that important. My new Dell laptop runs a Zen3 5700u with eight cores and scores 98ns in the Aida64 latency test, yet it still feels responsive.
H
HaTuYanga
06-27-2016, 04:48 AM #15

Don’t fixate too much on the figures—it’s not that important. My new Dell laptop runs a Zen3 5700u with eight cores and scores 98ns in the Aida64 latency test, yet it still feels responsive.

X
xBounce
Member
163
06-27-2016, 11:49 AM
#16
I keep trying to get the top results even if it doesn't seem obvious, just because I can. I recently upgraded my DDR2 to 1520 for that reason.
X
xBounce
06-27-2016, 11:49 AM #16

I keep trying to get the top results even if it doesn't seem obvious, just because I can. I recently upgraded my DDR2 to 1520 for that reason.

B
buttercraft21
Junior Member
2
06-27-2016, 12:05 PM
#17
This is the reason everyone follows it.
B
buttercraft21
06-27-2016, 12:05 PM #17

This is the reason everyone follows it.

T
TiPlaysFTW
Member
53
07-01-2016, 05:08 PM
#18
This might be a joke—I probably don’t understand it.
T
TiPlaysFTW
07-01-2016, 05:08 PM #18

This might be a joke—I probably don’t understand it.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2