Does having 64GB of RAM go beyond what you need?
Does having 64GB of RAM go beyond what you need?
In my ideal configuration, (priced at $5,126), I aim for 64GB DDR5 RAM. Is that too much?
Could your current tasks require more memory to run smoothly?
In this context, higher capacity drives pose challenges for the CPU's memory controller. You might not be able to achieve 4x16 at its advertised XMP speed, but 2x16 would function properly. You could theoretically use 2x32, though it may not be worth it since you're likely investing in something you won't use.
I’m planning to assemble a PC after graduation, starting with a laptop featuring an RTX 3060. In three years I aim for a high-end build, focusing on performance-intensive tools like Davinci Resolve and UE5. Would 64GB RAM be sufficient for those applications?
The timeline isn’t close yet. Consider checking back in 2.5 years. The biggest uncertainty is whether it will be useful, as many factors are involved and the answer remains uncertain. Could you share your planned resolution, bitrate, effects, clip length, and final edit duration?
I typically work in high definition. I currently rely on Canon 77D cameras.
I’d say agreeing that if you’re planning to build in three years, you should reconsider—by then the entire PC environment might have shifted; or it could stay the same. BUT, video editing stands out as one of the few tasks that truly gains from large memory amounts, provided the footage and file sizes justify it. Regarding RAM, it differs from graphics or CPU power in that simply adding more doesn’t always improve performance. You only gain an advantage when you actually run out of space. It’s similar to toilet paper: having millions of rolls isn’t much more useful than having a few if you don’t need to use them.