F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Does Factory Overclock influence subsequent overclocking?

Does Factory Overclock influence subsequent overclocking?

Does Factory Overclock influence subsequent overclocking?

H
HaTuYanga
Junior Member
22
01-08-2024, 10:17 PM
#1
I'm unsure about factory overclocking. Will both the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300x increase in speed equally or will the factory setting on the 1300x change how much each chip can boost?
This is confusing, especially since I'm not an expert. I already have a motherboard that supports overclocking, so I need to know if getting the 1300x will still give me enough performance after the factory adjustment.
It might be worth considering the extra cost if it really improves results.
H
HaTuYanga
01-08-2024, 10:17 PM #1

I'm unsure about factory overclocking. Will both the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300x increase in speed equally or will the factory setting on the 1300x change how much each chip can boost?
This is confusing, especially since I'm not an expert. I already have a motherboard that supports overclocking, so I need to know if getting the 1300x will still give me enough performance after the factory adjustment.
It might be worth considering the extra cost if it really improves results.

C
Charliemc909
Posting Freak
898
01-09-2024, 01:52 AM
#2
^^What he mentioned is clear. The X versus the non-X doesn’t imply the chip was overclocked from the factory. That refers to the intended speed. It’s like comparing an Intel i5 8700 to 8700K — the non-K version runs at 3.2GHz compared to 3.7GHz for the K model. When turbo is activated on all six cores, both reach 4.3GHz. The key difference lies in the Intel K series, which allows the chip to be unlocked and overclock beyond 4.3GHz with a suitable motherboard (Z-series), whereas the non-K version is limited to 4.3GHz in turbo mode and cannot exceed that.
C
Charliemc909
01-09-2024, 01:52 AM #2

^^What he mentioned is clear. The X versus the non-X doesn’t imply the chip was overclocked from the factory. That refers to the intended speed. It’s like comparing an Intel i5 8700 to 8700K — the non-K version runs at 3.2GHz compared to 3.7GHz for the K model. When turbo is activated on all six cores, both reach 4.3GHz. The key difference lies in the Intel K series, which allows the chip to be unlocked and overclock beyond 4.3GHz with a suitable motherboard (Z-series), whereas the non-K version is limited to 4.3GHz in turbo mode and cannot exceed that.

G
gymclo6
Member
187
01-09-2024, 10:15 AM
#3
Both the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300x models will not exceed 4 ghz. It makes little sense to purchase an overclocked CPU or GPU, as you can easily achieve similar results yourself in just about 20 minutes.
G
gymclo6
01-09-2024, 10:15 AM #3

Both the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300x models will not exceed 4 ghz. It makes little sense to purchase an overclocked CPU or GPU, as you can easily achieve similar results yourself in just about 20 minutes.

X
220
01-14-2024, 07:28 AM
#4
^^ What he mentioned is that the X versus non-X comparison doesn't indicate the chip was overclocked during manufacturing. It simply reflects the intended performance level of the chip. Comparing an Intel i5 8700 to 8700K is similar, as the non-K model features a lower core clock speed—3.2GHz compared to 3.7GHz in the 8700K. When turbo boosts all six cores, both reach 4.3GHz. The key distinction lies with the Intel K-series chips, which allow for higher overclocking beyond 4.3GHz on compatible motherboards (Z-series), whereas the non-K model is limited to 4.3GHz in turbo mode. The 1300X is capped at 4.0GHz regardless of turbo settings, making it significantly easier to reach that speed compared to the base 1200X, which would require a larger jump from its original speed for higher overclocking. This difference justifies the extra $20 for the 1300X. Another consideration is that purchasing the 1200X doesn't ensure a stable performance at 4.0GHz, whereas the 1300X offers a more reliable path to that benchmark.
X
xXStrikeBackXx
01-14-2024, 07:28 AM #4

^^ What he mentioned is that the X versus non-X comparison doesn't indicate the chip was overclocked during manufacturing. It simply reflects the intended performance level of the chip. Comparing an Intel i5 8700 to 8700K is similar, as the non-K model features a lower core clock speed—3.2GHz compared to 3.7GHz in the 8700K. When turbo boosts all six cores, both reach 4.3GHz. The key distinction lies with the Intel K-series chips, which allow for higher overclocking beyond 4.3GHz on compatible motherboards (Z-series), whereas the non-K model is limited to 4.3GHz in turbo mode. The 1300X is capped at 4.0GHz regardless of turbo settings, making it significantly easier to reach that speed compared to the base 1200X, which would require a larger jump from its original speed for higher overclocking. This difference justifies the extra $20 for the 1300X. Another consideration is that purchasing the 1200X doesn't ensure a stable performance at 4.0GHz, whereas the 1300X offers a more reliable path to that benchmark.

K
KudlKat
Member
50
01-15-2024, 03:18 AM
#5
Are you referring to the comparison between the 1200 and 1300X models, or are you inquiring about the additional cost for a pre-optimized chip? As mentioned earlier, most Ryzen processors tend to stabilize near similar speeds, typically between 3.8 and 4.0 GHz. Therefore, if you purchase a chip that has already reached 4.0 GHz, you can be confident it will maintain that speed. However, you might still achieve a slight improvement on another chip to within 5% (around 3.8 GHz) or even closer, while the pre-optimized chip is unlikely to exceed 4.0 GHz further.
K
KudlKat
01-15-2024, 03:18 AM #5

Are you referring to the comparison between the 1200 and 1300X models, or are you inquiring about the additional cost for a pre-optimized chip? As mentioned earlier, most Ryzen processors tend to stabilize near similar speeds, typically between 3.8 and 4.0 GHz. Therefore, if you purchase a chip that has already reached 4.0 GHz, you can be confident it will maintain that speed. However, you might still achieve a slight improvement on another chip to within 5% (around 3.8 GHz) or even closer, while the pre-optimized chip is unlikely to exceed 4.0 GHz further.