F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Do not start the system when attempting to set the RAM frequency to 1866mhz

Do not start the system when attempting to set the RAM frequency to 1866mhz

Do not start the system when attempting to set the RAM frequency to 1866mhz

R
raphiez
Junior Member
19
05-07-2017, 11:41 PM
#1
Hello everyone,
I've been experimenting with overclocking my PC for the first time and found it to be quite rewarding. However, recently I encountered a problem when attempting to boost the RAM frequency from 1600 to 1866 MHz.
I've tested all possible timing and voltage settings, even pushing the timings to their limits, but the new values aren't accepting.
It also seems there are no equivalent XMP options in my BIOS, so I'm forced to manually adjust the memory clock multiplier to 9.33, which brings it up to 1866 MHz, and then tweak the voltage and timings myself.
Every time I try this, I receive a warning: "The system has experienced boot failure because of overclocking. Last settings in this page may not match current H/W states."
Anyone have had success with a setup similar to mine? Thanks!
-AMD FX 9590 4.0ghz octocore
- 24 GB (3x8) DDR3 1600mhz (11-11-11-28) 1.5v
-GIGABYTE 78LMT-USB3 motherboard
-GTX 970 4GB
-650V power supply
-windows 10 64bit
-Corsair CW-9060021-WW Hydro Series H100i GTX
P.s. keep in mind that increasing frequency usually doesn't significantly improve performance, but I'm curious about your thoughts.
😛
R
raphiez
05-07-2017, 11:41 PM #1

Hello everyone,
I've been experimenting with overclocking my PC for the first time and found it to be quite rewarding. However, recently I encountered a problem when attempting to boost the RAM frequency from 1600 to 1866 MHz.
I've tested all possible timing and voltage settings, even pushing the timings to their limits, but the new values aren't accepting.
It also seems there are no equivalent XMP options in my BIOS, so I'm forced to manually adjust the memory clock multiplier to 9.33, which brings it up to 1866 MHz, and then tweak the voltage and timings myself.
Every time I try this, I receive a warning: "The system has experienced boot failure because of overclocking. Last settings in this page may not match current H/W states."
Anyone have had success with a setup similar to mine? Thanks!
-AMD FX 9590 4.0ghz octocore
- 24 GB (3x8) DDR3 1600mhz (11-11-11-28) 1.5v
-GIGABYTE 78LMT-USB3 motherboard
-GTX 970 4GB
-650V power supply
-windows 10 64bit
-Corsair CW-9060021-WW Hydro Series H100i GTX
P.s. keep in mind that increasing frequency usually doesn't significantly improve performance, but I'm curious about your thoughts.
😛

9
905xA
Senior Member
667
05-09-2017, 07:28 AM
#2
If the RAM isn't designed for 1866MHz, it's unlikely you can overclock it significantly.
9
905xA
05-09-2017, 07:28 AM #2

If the RAM isn't designed for 1866MHz, it's unlikely you can overclock it significantly.

M
Meskyorus
Junior Member
40
05-09-2017, 11:23 AM
#3
Count Mike shared his thoughts on the topic.
It seems unlikely you could achieve such a high overclock if the RAM isn't designed for 1866MHz.
He also mentioned finding related discussions that support this idea.
He thought it might be a case of hopeful assumptions rather than solid evidence.
M
Meskyorus
05-09-2017, 11:23 AM #3

Count Mike shared his thoughts on the topic.
It seems unlikely you could achieve such a high overclock if the RAM isn't designed for 1866MHz.
He also mentioned finding related discussions that support this idea.
He thought it might be a case of hopeful assumptions rather than solid evidence.

J
Jullion7
Junior Member
21
05-10-2017, 07:56 PM
#4
Yeah, a bit optimistic there. For instance, I could never get my Kingston HyperX 1600 to push over ~1650 MHz no matter what voltage but similar HyperX 1866KHz goes over 2000MHz without problems even at stock 1.5v.
J
Jullion7
05-10-2017, 07:56 PM #4

Yeah, a bit optimistic there. For instance, I could never get my Kingston HyperX 1600 to push over ~1650 MHz no matter what voltage but similar HyperX 1866KHz goes over 2000MHz without problems even at stock 1.5v.

B
BlueStar_LH
Posting Freak
842
05-16-2017, 01:47 AM
#5
Based on what I observe, the initial constraints stem from your motherboard (maximum supported 1600 MHz), which limits what you can achieve.
B
BlueStar_LH
05-16-2017, 01:47 AM #5

Based on what I observe, the initial constraints stem from your motherboard (maximum supported 1600 MHz), which limits what you can achieve.

H
HydraEliphant
Member
212
05-17-2017, 09:28 AM
#6
From what I observe, the initial constraints stem from your motherboard (maximum supported 1600 MHz), which limits what you can achieve. Thanks, Dragos, I've noticed some discussions suggesting running RAM at 1866 and above, but that might not be reliable. Hopefully not—upgrading the motherboard is quite challenging, as I see.
H
HydraEliphant
05-17-2017, 09:28 AM #6

From what I observe, the initial constraints stem from your motherboard (maximum supported 1600 MHz), which limits what you can achieve. Thanks, Dragos, I've noticed some discussions suggesting running RAM at 1866 and above, but that might not be reliable. Hopefully not—upgrading the motherboard is quite challenging, as I see.

A
Acew25
Member
51
05-19-2017, 02:32 AM
#7
CountMike shared some thoughts on the topic. He mentioned difficulties in reaching certain frequencies with his Kingston HyperX 1600, but noted that a higher model like the HyperX 1866KHz could exceed 2000MHz without issues even at a standard voltage. He also referenced looking into Hyper X Fury pairs, but wondered if they'd be unnecessary if the motherboard only supports up to 1600 MHz.
A
Acew25
05-19-2017, 02:32 AM #7

CountMike shared some thoughts on the topic. He mentioned difficulties in reaching certain frequencies with his Kingston HyperX 1600, but noted that a higher model like the HyperX 1866KHz could exceed 2000MHz without issues even at a standard voltage. He also referenced looking into Hyper X Fury pairs, but wondered if they'd be unnecessary if the motherboard only supports up to 1600 MHz.