F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Discussion NEW Cinebench R20 Benchmark Outcomes - i9 9900K

Discussion NEW Cinebench R20 Benchmark Outcomes - i9 9900K

Discussion NEW Cinebench R20 Benchmark Outcomes - i9 9900K

P
ProXLegacyX
Junior Member
5
03-26-2018, 10:12 PM
#1
Conducted multiple benchmarks using Cinebench R20 on my i9 9900K. I ran tests at both stock and overclocked speeds—5.0GHz and 5.1GHz. Please share your findings or ask any questions.
P
ProXLegacyX
03-26-2018, 10:12 PM #1

Conducted multiple benchmarks using Cinebench R20 on my i9 9900K. I ran tests at both stock and overclocked speeds—5.0GHz and 5.1GHz. Please share your findings or ask any questions.

X
XxTBretzxX
Member
134
03-28-2018, 12:34 PM
#2
I understand the 9900k is a great CPU, but only beating the 7700k by 25-35 points feels a bit underwhelming. After rebuilding my loop and getting the rig back online, I'll check the single-core score of my 6600k against the 9900k. The multi-core score probably won't be impressive, just showing how well this 14nm process is pushed.
X
XxTBretzxX
03-28-2018, 12:34 PM #2

I understand the 9900k is a great CPU, but only beating the 7700k by 25-35 points feels a bit underwhelming. After rebuilding my loop and getting the rig back online, I'll check the single-core score of my 6600k against the 9900k. The multi-core score probably won't be impressive, just showing how well this 14nm process is pushed.

_
_sharktapus_
Member
107
04-14-2018, 08:39 AM
#3
Consider the metrics this benchmark evaluates—it's tailored for specific software in video editing, etc., and isn't applicable to gaming. The outcomes here don't indicate improved performance in that context.
_
_sharktapus_
04-14-2018, 08:39 AM #3

Consider the metrics this benchmark evaluates—it's tailored for specific software in video editing, etc., and isn't applicable to gaming. The outcomes here don't indicate improved performance in that context.

A
Atlastic
Member
141
04-14-2018, 03:43 PM
#4
The screenshots from the multi-core rankings are clear. I believe the 7700K scores are accurate at the stock clock speed, so I'm in agreement that the single-core performance is decent but not outstanding. The multi-core score, however, significantly surpasses the 7700K right out of the box.
A
Atlastic
04-14-2018, 03:43 PM #4

The screenshots from the multi-core rankings are clear. I believe the 7700K scores are accurate at the stock clock speed, so I'm in agreement that the single-core performance is decent but not outstanding. The multi-core score, however, significantly surpasses the 7700K right out of the box.

B
boriagot
Member
112
04-14-2018, 08:38 PM
#5
new to the forum and wanted to share my tweaked results for fun. Usually I run at 5ghz, but have varying load settings. This is 5.1 @ 1.31 & 5.3 @ 1.4v. Cheers
B
boriagot
04-14-2018, 08:38 PM #5

new to the forum and wanted to share my tweaked results for fun. Usually I run at 5ghz, but have varying load settings. This is 5.1 @ 1.31 & 5.3 @ 1.4v. Cheers

J
juri1990
Senior Member
441
04-14-2018, 09:45 PM
#6
No image available since I'm away for a while
J
juri1990
04-14-2018, 09:45 PM #6

No image available since I'm away for a while

N
NottaSpy
Member
232
04-15-2018, 03:21 PM
#7
Here's the pic:
N
NottaSpy
04-15-2018, 03:21 PM #7

Here's the pic:

V
VetGirl1
Member
165
04-18-2018, 07:56 PM
#8
I experienced significant pain in my 9900KF because I couldn't find reliable information online about scores, voltages, and settings. After a month of use and some adjustments over two full days, I settled on a stable configuration at 5.1Ghz @ 1.33v with the CoolerMaster Maker 8 air cooler. The system runs quietly since it won't run continuously at high temperatures. It briefly hit temperature throttling for about five seconds, but that's acceptable. If you're seeking lower temps or fear CPU damage, I considered Corsair H150i but didn't replace the whole unit.
V
VetGirl1
04-18-2018, 07:56 PM #8

I experienced significant pain in my 9900KF because I couldn't find reliable information online about scores, voltages, and settings. After a month of use and some adjustments over two full days, I settled on a stable configuration at 5.1Ghz @ 1.33v with the CoolerMaster Maker 8 air cooler. The system runs quietly since it won't run continuously at high temperatures. It briefly hit temperature throttling for about five seconds, but that's acceptable. If you're seeking lower temps or fear CPU damage, I considered Corsair H150i but didn't replace the whole unit.

Z
Zemboyy
Member
235
04-19-2018, 12:33 AM
#9
It seems the focus is on comparing performance differences between CPUs. The key point is that the 9900k offers more cores than the 7700k, making it significantly faster despite being slightly slower per core. The argument about cost versus performance is similar to comparing a car with lower power output to one with higher power—such comparisons aren't always fair.
Z
Zemboyy
04-19-2018, 12:33 AM #9

It seems the focus is on comparing performance differences between CPUs. The key point is that the 9900k offers more cores than the 7700k, making it significantly faster despite being slightly slower per core. The argument about cost versus performance is similar to comparing a car with lower power output to one with higher power—such comparisons aren't always fair.