F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Discussing boosting laptop CPU performance

Discussing boosting laptop CPU performance

Discussing boosting laptop CPU performance

X
xTripleMinerx
Posting Freak
846
05-24-2016, 01:24 AM
#1
Someone suggested increasing your laptop's CPU speed. You're curious about the steps to do it yourself.
X
xTripleMinerx
05-24-2016, 01:24 AM #1

Someone suggested increasing your laptop's CPU speed. You're curious about the steps to do it yourself.

H
Hered
Junior Member
10
05-24-2016, 02:15 AM
#2
Usually, it's not advised, particularly for laptops, because maintaining optimal temperature is challenging.
H
Hered
05-24-2016, 02:15 AM #2

Usually, it's not advised, particularly for laptops, because maintaining optimal temperature is challenging.

A
amandabuddy
Member
56
05-25-2016, 03:15 PM
#3
Your processor is identified as an Intel Core i7-10510U running at 1.80GHz and 2.30GHz according to Windows.
A
amandabuddy
05-25-2016, 03:15 PM #3

Your processor is identified as an Intel Core i7-10510U running at 1.80GHz and 2.30GHz according to Windows.

P
puppydemon20
Member
165
05-28-2016, 11:32 PM
#4
According to what I understand, it's a secured chip, and Intel doesn't permit you to boost its speed beyond limits. You might adjust settings in Intel's XTU, but those changes are probably restricted by the manufacturer.
P
puppydemon20
05-28-2016, 11:32 PM #4

According to what I understand, it's a secured chip, and Intel doesn't permit you to boost its speed beyond limits. You might adjust settings in Intel's XTU, but those changes are probably restricted by the manufacturer.

B
BeastMLB
Junior Member
11
05-29-2016, 05:29 AM
#5
Thanks! My computer handles high-performance titles smoothly.
B
BeastMLB
05-29-2016, 05:29 AM #5

Thanks! My computer handles high-performance titles smoothly.

G
Gaspoda
Member
246
05-29-2016, 05:54 AM
#6
It's not advised to overclock a laptop unless you've seen plenty of high-end, thick models and misunderstood the terms.
G
Gaspoda
05-29-2016, 05:54 AM #6

It's not advised to overclock a laptop unless you've seen plenty of high-end, thick models and misunderstood the terms.

T
TehStratosHD
Senior Member
492
05-29-2016, 02:48 PM
#7
What processor are you using? Additionally, the VRMs and cooling systems might not be designed for overclocking, and the BIOS likely won’t support it unless you own a very costly gaming laptop.
T
TehStratosHD
05-29-2016, 02:48 PM #7

What processor are you using? Additionally, the VRMs and cooling systems might not be designed for overclocking, and the BIOS likely won’t support it unless you own a very costly gaming laptop.

M
Macattack1972
Member
140
05-29-2016, 05:47 PM
#8
The Asus Zenbook runs an Intel Core i7-10510U processor with a 15 Watt power draw. Achieving nearly 4.3 GHz across all cores during a full stress test is remarkable, especially given the CPU's modest 15W TDP. These chips don’t allow overclocking, though in the right machine you can tweak settings to boost performance noticeably. To my knowledge, Intel XTU doesn’t support their 10th Gen low-power U series CPUs.
M
Macattack1972
05-29-2016, 05:47 PM #8

The Asus Zenbook runs an Intel Core i7-10510U processor with a 15 Watt power draw. Achieving nearly 4.3 GHz across all cores during a full stress test is remarkable, especially given the CPU's modest 15W TDP. These chips don’t allow overclocking, though in the right machine you can tweak settings to boost performance noticeably. To my knowledge, Intel XTU doesn’t support their 10th Gen low-power U series CPUs.

D
DonCruzader
Member
71
06-02-2016, 01:48 PM
#9
It seems like you're starting a thought process. Would you like to continue or clarify what you're asking?
D
DonCruzader
06-02-2016, 01:48 PM #9

It seems like you're starting a thought process. Would you like to continue or clarify what you're asking?

F
FakieLife
Member
154
06-02-2016, 03:19 PM
#10
Some laptops indeed feature K chips that allow overclocking to some extent. The point being is the area where the power cap was set around 53 watts was likely from a past experience with an i3-6100. I didn’t reinstall Windows or XTU when I moved to the i7-6700K. Also, the system won’t let me exceed a multiplier of 35; I have to rely on per-core turbo in the lower part of XTU for overclocking. Notably, my machine lacks any OC settings in the BIOS (and even has the classic white text on blue background, despite being a Skylake 6th-gen Z170 chipset). In short, I’m forced to use XTU for overclocking. My power limit remains unlocked, but I prefer keeping it below roughly 112–116 watts. I’m unsure if I could modify an i9-9900 into my laptop, but I’m curious about its potential performance at around 105 watts or less. Perhaps focusing on non-K processors would be better, as long as they can run all cores up to single-core turbo; otherwise, temperature limits seem to matter more than the vendor. Cooling constraints in my machine cap it to about 4.5–4.6 GHz for normal overclocking. I can briefly reach 4.7 and sometimes complete a Cinebench test, but it sits right at the edge—just enough to avoid instability yet not enough for sustained high performance.
F
FakieLife
06-02-2016, 03:19 PM #10

Some laptops indeed feature K chips that allow overclocking to some extent. The point being is the area where the power cap was set around 53 watts was likely from a past experience with an i3-6100. I didn’t reinstall Windows or XTU when I moved to the i7-6700K. Also, the system won’t let me exceed a multiplier of 35; I have to rely on per-core turbo in the lower part of XTU for overclocking. Notably, my machine lacks any OC settings in the BIOS (and even has the classic white text on blue background, despite being a Skylake 6th-gen Z170 chipset). In short, I’m forced to use XTU for overclocking. My power limit remains unlocked, but I prefer keeping it below roughly 112–116 watts. I’m unsure if I could modify an i9-9900 into my laptop, but I’m curious about its potential performance at around 105 watts or less. Perhaps focusing on non-K processors would be better, as long as they can run all cores up to single-core turbo; otherwise, temperature limits seem to matter more than the vendor. Cooling constraints in my machine cap it to about 4.5–4.6 GHz for normal overclocking. I can briefly reach 4.7 and sometimes complete a Cinebench test, but it sits right at the edge—just enough to avoid instability yet not enough for sustained high performance.