F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Different Types of GPUs

Different Types of GPUs

Different Types of GPUs

T
Trayleio
Member
63
07-04-2016, 11:06 PM
#1
Hello everyone, I understand that NVIDIA/AMD create the core GPU, while other firms add minor enhancements before selling them. Brands like MSI and ASUS are what I’m referring to. I also know some companies produce aftermarket coolers claiming to outperform both the base models from NVIDIA/AMD and the upgraded versions from ASUS/MSI. It made me wonder, is cooling the only aspect they improved? If I used the same aftermarket cooler for an ASUS GTX 970 Turbo as one for an NVIDIA base GTX 970, would their performance and overclocking capabilities be identical? Since they now have matching coolers, thanks!
T
Trayleio
07-04-2016, 11:06 PM #1

Hello everyone, I understand that NVIDIA/AMD create the core GPU, while other firms add minor enhancements before selling them. Brands like MSI and ASUS are what I’m referring to. I also know some companies produce aftermarket coolers claiming to outperform both the base models from NVIDIA/AMD and the upgraded versions from ASUS/MSI. It made me wonder, is cooling the only aspect they improved? If I used the same aftermarket cooler for an ASUS GTX 970 Turbo as one for an NVIDIA base GTX 970, would their performance and overclocking capabilities be identical? Since they now have matching coolers, thanks!

F
Firenovas
Junior Member
44
07-05-2016, 05:00 AM
#2
Before starting water cooling, make sure you have the card you want and try it out without modifications first. Back then, when the 780 was popular, I had Asus CU cards in SLI. Another member bought Poseidon's 780 models, paying roughly $75 to $100 extra because they came with a water block. He spent more on custom water cooling setups, but his performance lagged behind my stock GPUs. This experience reinforced the idea that 'all GPUs are individual'—people often buy a CPU or GPU and spend heavily on water cooling only to discover their chip isn't optimized for it, and they usually realize too late.
F
Firenovas
07-05-2016, 05:00 AM #2

Before starting water cooling, make sure you have the card you want and try it out without modifications first. Back then, when the 780 was popular, I had Asus CU cards in SLI. Another member bought Poseidon's 780 models, paying roughly $75 to $100 extra because they came with a water block. He spent more on custom water cooling setups, but his performance lagged behind my stock GPUs. This experience reinforced the idea that 'all GPUs are individual'—people often buy a CPU or GPU and spend heavily on water cooling only to discover their chip isn't optimized for it, and they usually realize too late.

M
85
07-06-2016, 01:43 PM
#3
The key distinctions lie in the fans, heatsink, and materials employed. Furthermore, aftermarket versions usually offer better GPU clock speeds, memory bandwidth, and other performance aspects.
M
MADknight115MC
07-06-2016, 01:43 PM #3

The key distinctions lie in the fans, heatsink, and materials employed. Furthermore, aftermarket versions usually offer better GPU clock speeds, memory bandwidth, and other performance aspects.

C
57
07-10-2016, 04:52 PM
#4
GPUs are completely individual units that can vary significantly in overclocking potential. They are typically grouped by manufacturers, such as Asus offering various 980Ti cards with different core speeds. These include the Strix, Strix OC, Poseidon, Matrix, and Gold Edition models, each featuring excellent cooling solutions. Excluding liquid cooling, finding a third-party cooler that performs better is quite challenging. The same applies to EVGA and other brands.
C
CamilloGamer13
07-10-2016, 04:52 PM #4

GPUs are completely individual units that can vary significantly in overclocking potential. They are typically grouped by manufacturers, such as Asus offering various 980Ti cards with different core speeds. These include the Strix, Strix OC, Poseidon, Matrix, and Gold Edition models, each featuring excellent cooling solutions. Excluding liquid cooling, finding a third-party cooler that performs better is quite challenging. The same applies to EVGA and other brands.

J
JeffMaHomey
Junior Member
13
07-10-2016, 09:47 PM
#5
Yeah, when I mentioned aftermarket cooler I meant liquid cooling. If you're planning to spend extra on aftermarket, you'd better go all the way. So, if I were aiming for the best performance from a specific model, I'd choose the highest quality one available—like an ASUS, ROG, or Strix—and then invest in a top-tier liquid cooler.
J
JeffMaHomey
07-10-2016, 09:47 PM #5

Yeah, when I mentioned aftermarket cooler I meant liquid cooling. If you're planning to spend extra on aftermarket, you'd better go all the way. So, if I were aiming for the best performance from a specific model, I'd choose the highest quality one available—like an ASUS, ROG, or Strix—and then invest in a top-tier liquid cooler.

P
pierre_man123
Member
63
07-12-2016, 05:43 PM
#6
Yeah, when I mentioned aftermarket cooler I was talking about liquid cooling. Think about it, if you're willing to spend extra on the aftermarket version, you should go all out. So, if I were aiming for the best performance from a specific model, I'd choose the top-tier option available—like an ROG or Strix—and then upgrade with a high-quality aftermarket liquid cooler. Right?

The chip's quality is linked to how well it was "binned" during manufacturing. If you're after the best cooling, custom watercooling would be ideal—but honestly, I don't think it's worth the effort. Just stick with standard aftermarket coolers. Watercooling needs upkeep, and you'd lose the flexibility to move your PC around.
P
pierre_man123
07-12-2016, 05:43 PM #6

Yeah, when I mentioned aftermarket cooler I was talking about liquid cooling. Think about it, if you're willing to spend extra on the aftermarket version, you should go all out. So, if I were aiming for the best performance from a specific model, I'd choose the top-tier option available—like an ROG or Strix—and then upgrade with a high-quality aftermarket liquid cooler. Right?

The chip's quality is linked to how well it was "binned" during manufacturing. If you're after the best cooling, custom watercooling would be ideal—but honestly, I don't think it's worth the effort. Just stick with standard aftermarket coolers. Watercooling needs upkeep, and you'd lose the flexibility to move your PC around.

H
hrgriff
Senior Member
573
07-19-2016, 08:54 AM
#7
Before starting water cooling, make sure you have the card you want and try it out first. Back then, when the 780 was popular, I had Asus CU cards in SLI. Another member bought Poseidon's 780 models, paying roughly $75 to $100 extra because they came with a water block. They spent more on custom water cooling setups, but their performance didn’t match my stock GPUs. This is why I emphasized the importance of getting everything right before jumping into water cooling.
H
hrgriff
07-19-2016, 08:54 AM #7

Before starting water cooling, make sure you have the card you want and try it out first. Back then, when the 780 was popular, I had Asus CU cards in SLI. Another member bought Poseidon's 780 models, paying roughly $75 to $100 extra because they came with a water block. They spent more on custom water cooling setups, but their performance didn’t match my stock GPUs. This is why I emphasized the importance of getting everything right before jumping into water cooling.