F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Device fails to operate at its highest performance level.

Device fails to operate at its highest performance level.

Device fails to operate at its highest performance level.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
Z
ZeusTrucker
Member
221
04-21-2023, 12:41 AM
#1
You're experiencing lower-than-expected Wi-Fi speeds even though you've applied DD-WRT. Since your phone is a dual-stream device, it should handle around 866 Mbps locally. The discrepancy suggests an issue with the network configuration or interference. Consider checking signal strength, router placement, and potential channel conflicts.
Z
ZeusTrucker
04-21-2023, 12:41 AM #1

You're experiencing lower-than-expected Wi-Fi speeds even though you've applied DD-WRT. Since your phone is a dual-stream device, it should handle around 866 Mbps locally. The discrepancy suggests an issue with the network configuration or interference. Consider checking signal strength, router placement, and potential channel conflicts.

S
Streiyn
Posting Freak
768
04-21-2023, 04:26 PM
#2
Use another wireless gadget for testing. If the problem continues: Look for signal clashes (many nearby access points, etc). Position the device close to the router to remove distance effects. However, interference is usually the main concern following a phone.
S
Streiyn
04-21-2023, 04:26 PM #2

Use another wireless gadget for testing. If the problem continues: Look for signal clashes (many nearby access points, etc). Position the device close to the router to remove distance effects. However, interference is usually the main concern following a phone.

P
Pieftw247
Member
201
04-25-2023, 03:08 PM
#3
It seems the device is configured for channel 112, but you mentioned that this isn't possible with the standard firmware.
P
Pieftw247
04-25-2023, 03:08 PM #3

It seems the device is configured for channel 112, but you mentioned that this isn't possible with the standard firmware.

C
carp3
Senior Member
572
04-30-2023, 08:38 PM
#4
Have you explored a different gadget?
C
carp3
04-30-2023, 08:38 PM #4

Have you explored a different gadget?

I
IkBenHetBram
Senior Member
735
04-30-2023, 08:44 PM
#5
The laptop advertises a speed of 400mbps yet performs much more slowly than expected.
I
IkBenHetBram
04-30-2023, 08:44 PM #5

The laptop advertises a speed of 400mbps yet performs much more slowly than expected.

E
Elliot1030
Member
58
05-07-2023, 08:04 PM
#6
It seems you're uncertain. Would you like me to reset the router?
E
Elliot1030
05-07-2023, 08:04 PM #6

It seems you're uncertain. Would you like me to reset the router?

_
_Blue_Viper_
Junior Member
4
05-07-2023, 09:40 PM
#7
The limit for 866 is capped at 5 GHz. What’s the deal? You won’t hit the real maximum with Wi-Fi—it’s just not possible. The numbers are theoretical. Be grateful if you manage about two-thirds of the speed. 5GHz offers less coverage and penetration. Things like thick walls or concrete barriers make it worse. Even though 5GHz is generally free, some devices use it—like cordless phones. In the US, weather radar also employs it, and the government shares parts of the spectrum, which could be a problem.
_
_Blue_Viper_
05-07-2023, 09:40 PM #7

The limit for 866 is capped at 5 GHz. What’s the deal? You won’t hit the real maximum with Wi-Fi—it’s just not possible. The numbers are theoretical. Be grateful if you manage about two-thirds of the speed. 5GHz offers less coverage and penetration. Things like thick walls or concrete barriers make it worse. Even though 5GHz is generally free, some devices use it—like cordless phones. In the US, weather radar also employs it, and the government shares parts of the spectrum, which could be a problem.

H
HellNether
Senior Member
731
05-08-2023, 02:46 PM
#8
The challenges become irrelevant when the gadget is close to the router. Also noted, the phone supports up to 866 Mbps while the router handles 1300 Mbps. EDIT: My approach wasn’t clear, but my checks now operate around 750 Mbps, which feels more accurate. Need more details. Updated August 29, 2018 by Colt_0pz
H
HellNether
05-08-2023, 02:46 PM #8

The challenges become irrelevant when the gadget is close to the router. Also noted, the phone supports up to 866 Mbps while the router handles 1300 Mbps. EDIT: My approach wasn’t clear, but my checks now operate around 750 Mbps, which feels more accurate. Need more details. Updated August 29, 2018 by Colt_0pz

D
DJbehouden
Member
55
05-15-2023, 06:01 AM
#9
I mentioned the speeds on the box are "THEORETICAL." You won't reach the actual top speeds. Also, a 1300 Mbps connection on the box equals a combined 2.4 and 5 Ghz frequency. 867 Mbps represents the upper limit that most phones and laptop networking cards can handle, again just a theoretical maximum. It's similar to this: an 8x4 cable modem should be able to achieve around 343 Mbps according to the Docsis 3.0 guidelines. Nevertheless, most cable companies only provide up to 200 Mbps on the modem. Since these standards are theoretical, in practice they rarely reach such performance. About three-quarters of 866 is roughly 570 Mbps, which might be closer to what you can expect in real life. You might also find some routers and wireless cards using specific standards to boost speeds. Unless both the card and router adhere to those standards, you may not approach full capacity. Also, as previously noted, interference from other devices could affect results. Radar is known to operate in the 5 Ghz band, while DFS allows radar and WiFi to share the same spectrum.
D
DJbehouden
05-15-2023, 06:01 AM #9

I mentioned the speeds on the box are "THEORETICAL." You won't reach the actual top speeds. Also, a 1300 Mbps connection on the box equals a combined 2.4 and 5 Ghz frequency. 867 Mbps represents the upper limit that most phones and laptop networking cards can handle, again just a theoretical maximum. It's similar to this: an 8x4 cable modem should be able to achieve around 343 Mbps according to the Docsis 3.0 guidelines. Nevertheless, most cable companies only provide up to 200 Mbps on the modem. Since these standards are theoretical, in practice they rarely reach such performance. About three-quarters of 866 is roughly 570 Mbps, which might be closer to what you can expect in real life. You might also find some routers and wireless cards using specific standards to boost speeds. Unless both the card and router adhere to those standards, you may not approach full capacity. Also, as previously noted, interference from other devices could affect results. Radar is known to operate in the 5 Ghz band, while DFS allows radar and WiFi to share the same spectrum.

C
csige791
Posting Freak
818
05-15-2023, 08:47 AM
#10
If that's true, the box would display 1900mbps (actually 1300mbps on 5AC plus an extra 600 mbps on 2.4N). I'm sure my Galaxy S7 is a dual-stream device, so it should handle up to about 866 mbps theoretically. I'm not measuring the actual internet speed, just local performance. Since I can't reach those higher numbers, I expect around 750 mbps—which is within an acceptable range.
C
csige791
05-15-2023, 08:47 AM #10

If that's true, the box would display 1900mbps (actually 1300mbps on 5AC plus an extra 600 mbps on 2.4N). I'm sure my Galaxy S7 is a dual-stream device, so it should handle up to about 866 mbps theoretically. I'm not measuring the actual internet speed, just local performance. Since I can't reach those higher numbers, I expect around 750 mbps—which is within an acceptable range.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next