F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Deus Ex: Mankind Divided ratings compare performances across platforms.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided ratings compare performances across platforms.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided ratings compare performances across platforms.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
Thiis_Random
Junior Member
1
07-06-2016, 01:10 PM
#1
the excitement is growing fast with the 1070... wow. given it's an AMD title, it makes sense. even the 480-inch version ahead the 1060 feels like a good chance to bring this up again when DX12 launches.
T
Thiis_Random
07-06-2016, 01:10 PM #1

the excitement is growing fast with the 1070... wow. given it's an AMD title, it makes sense. even the 480-inch version ahead the 1060 feels like a good chance to bring this up again when DX12 launches.

X
xXRAXERXx
Posting Freak
817
07-11-2016, 03:37 AM
#2
It's disappointing to notice benchmarks missing GTX 970 support. I purchased one three months back and had no idea the 1060 would be released.
X
xXRAXERXx
07-11-2016, 03:37 AM #2

It's disappointing to notice benchmarks missing GTX 970 support. I purchased one three months back and had no idea the 1060 would be released.

Y
YamatOrochi
Junior Member
9
07-11-2016, 11:43 AM
#3
It seems likely it's similar to an R9 390 or possibly 390X.
Y
YamatOrochi
07-11-2016, 11:43 AM #3

It seems likely it's similar to an R9 390 or possibly 390X.

X
xRawzx
Member
177
07-13-2016, 07:46 PM
#4
780Ti offers a 42 average rating with a 30-minute duration at 1080p quality.
X
xRawzx
07-13-2016, 07:46 PM #4

780Ti offers a 42 average rating with a 30-minute duration at 1080p quality.

E
Erwu4N
Member
53
07-14-2016, 12:35 PM
#5
R9 Nano outperforms the GTX 980 Ti. Picture its performance in DX12, following the shift toward favoring AMD over Nvidia graphics cards.
E
Erwu4N
07-14-2016, 12:35 PM #5

R9 Nano outperforms the GTX 980 Ti. Picture its performance in DX12, following the shift toward favoring AMD over Nvidia graphics cards.

D
deathtodawn
Member
216
08-03-2016, 10:26 PM
#6
It runs much slower than the others, likely around the 780Ti range.
D
deathtodawn
08-03-2016, 10:26 PM #6

It runs much slower than the others, likely around the 780Ti range.

H
HunterMann99
Member
210
08-04-2016, 09:39 PM
#7
It's not the standard or lowest level; it's set to maximum or very high.
H
HunterMann99
08-04-2016, 09:39 PM #7

It's not the standard or lowest level; it's set to maximum or very high.

L
LeCuriousFox
Member
227
08-04-2016, 10:00 PM
#8
Sure, let's keep it simple. What do you need?
L
LeCuriousFox
08-04-2016, 10:00 PM #8

Sure, let's keep it simple. What do you need?

L
Lulita300
Junior Member
35
08-04-2016, 10:40 PM
#9
That's a long shot, but I'll take it. What's your take on it?
L
Lulita300
08-04-2016, 10:40 PM #9

That's a long shot, but I'll take it. What's your take on it?

S
Snggles0010
Junior Member
13
08-05-2016, 04:34 AM
#10
Running at 1440 with 980 TI at Ultra, using a couple of high settings (shadows ignored, SMAA disabled), you're seeing an average performance in the low 60s dropping to mid-50s. It looks like the wqhd values are consistently low.
S
Snggles0010
08-05-2016, 04:34 AM #10

Running at 1440 with 980 TI at Ultra, using a couple of high settings (shadows ignored, SMAA disabled), you're seeing an average performance in the low 60s dropping to mid-50s. It looks like the wqhd values are consistently low.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next