F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Determine your needs based on your network requirements and choose between managed or unmanaged switches accordingly.

Determine your needs based on your network requirements and choose between managed or unmanaged switches accordingly.

Determine your needs based on your network requirements and choose between managed or unmanaged switches accordingly.

K
KeyZanYT
Member
64
10-11-2016, 09:46 PM
#1
I’m setting up a wired network for a rental property. I expect renters to use table-top switches instead of wireless where there are more devices than wall jacks—like home entertainment areas, bedrooms with PCs and multiple consoles. I’m wondering if an unmanaged switch will handle this well or if a manageable switch is better for the main network. Should the remote table-top switches match the brand of the main switch, or does that not matter? Appreciate your help, Matthew.
K
KeyZanYT
10-11-2016, 09:46 PM #1

I’m setting up a wired network for a rental property. I expect renters to use table-top switches instead of wireless where there are more devices than wall jacks—like home entertainment areas, bedrooms with PCs and multiple consoles. I’m wondering if an unmanaged switch will handle this well or if a manageable switch is better for the main network. Should the remote table-top switches match the brand of the main switch, or does that not matter? Appreciate your help, Matthew.

D
DivineCloud
Junior Member
14
10-11-2016, 11:15 PM
#2
The distinction isn't about speed; it's about designing tailored rules for data flow. It seems you don’t require this level of control, so unmanaged works just fine. Additionally, whether devices are from the same brand doesn’t matter.
D
DivineCloud
10-11-2016, 11:15 PM #2

The distinction isn't about speed; it's about designing tailored rules for data flow. It seems you don’t require this level of control, so unmanaged works just fine. Additionally, whether devices are from the same brand doesn’t matter.

T
TheBozoPlays
Senior Member
642
10-12-2016, 12:25 AM
#3
The only way I've seen improvement comes from combining speeds and using flow control, which appears to enhance optimization. In most cases, leaving it unmanaged works adequately. Particularly when it's meant for a broadband connection, which is already very fast compared to typical switching times.
T
TheBozoPlays
10-12-2016, 12:25 AM #3

The only way I've seen improvement comes from combining speeds and using flow control, which appears to enhance optimization. In most cases, leaving it unmanaged works adequately. Particularly when it's meant for a broadband connection, which is already very fast compared to typical switching times.

S
Siriusness
Member
67
10-24-2016, 07:12 AM
#4
The question concerns directing traffic through multiple switches. The setup involves a main network switch connecting to several local switches—one in the living room and three in the bedrooms. The goal is understanding how data reaches its intended destination across these connections.
S
Siriusness
10-24-2016, 07:12 AM #4

The question concerns directing traffic through multiple switches. The setup involves a main network switch connecting to several local switches—one in the living room and three in the bedrooms. The goal is understanding how data reaches its intended destination across these connections.

N
NoodleLips
Member
160
10-24-2016, 02:29 PM
#5
They generate a list of MAC addresses automatically so you can track which MAC is linked to which port on each switch. This ensures that even with switches arranged in a simple sequence like 1 - 2 - 3, the system knows how to route traffic correctly. The process happens in nanoseconds, making it seamless and requiring no manual thought. The main concern is whether any single port could become a bottleneck, but given the high-speed nature of gigabit connections, this is unlikely. For best performance, connect each switch directly to a central switch instead of chaining them together. However, in everyday use it usually doesn’t matter much.
N
NoodleLips
10-24-2016, 02:29 PM #5

They generate a list of MAC addresses automatically so you can track which MAC is linked to which port on each switch. This ensures that even with switches arranged in a simple sequence like 1 - 2 - 3, the system knows how to route traffic correctly. The process happens in nanoseconds, making it seamless and requiring no manual thought. The main concern is whether any single port could become a bottleneck, but given the high-speed nature of gigabit connections, this is unlikely. For best performance, connect each switch directly to a central switch instead of chaining them together. However, in everyday use it usually doesn’t matter much.

M
mikeinsaw
Member
162
10-25-2016, 11:56 AM
#6
Ensuring setup stability is key. Each room will have 1 to 3 Jacks with dedicated ports on the main switch. This arrangement prevents issues when connecting multiple 5-port switches into specific ports like 2, 5, 7, and 13 on the main switch, which is a 16/24-port device.
M
mikeinsaw
10-25-2016, 11:56 AM #6

Ensuring setup stability is key. Each room will have 1 to 3 Jacks with dedicated ports on the main switch. This arrangement prevents issues when connecting multiple 5-port switches into specific ports like 2, 5, 7, and 13 on the main switch, which is a 16/24-port device.