DDR4 performance ranking official version: 3

F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop DDR4 performance ranking official version: 3

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3

GWMagic
Junior Member

11-04-2016, 03:22 AM

#21

Your memory controller supports only up to 4300MHz, anything higher will not work.

GWMagic

11-04-2016, 03:22 AM #21

Your memory controller supports only up to 4300MHz, anything higher will not work.

lcw123
Junior Member

11-04-2016, 04:59 AM

#22

If Intel could separate those components, I’d think their CPUs could reach much higher RAM speeds. It would only introduce around 4 to 7 nanoseconds of delay in AIDA64. Even on my Ryzen at 4600C16, that would remain extremely low latency for an Intel processor.

lcw123

11-04-2016, 04:59 AM #22

derpdeherp
Member

11-04-2016, 06:55 AM

#23

I've experimented with several memory dividers. The IMC seems to be at its limit—it runs faster but isn't stable. I stick to what works for benchmarks and video cards. Wish I could get a better clock speed for the GTX 770. This machine is terrible. EVGA—definitely not worth it.

derpdeherp

11-04-2016, 06:55 AM #23

Robater
Member

11-10-2016, 10:44 PM

#24

This discussion led me into a deep dive about 70,000 copies of Aida. The nearest I found was around 69,993 MB. Ugh.

Robater

11-10-2016, 10:44 PM #24

This discussion led me into a deep dive about 70,000 copies of Aida. The nearest I found was around 69,993 MB. Ugh.

Albon07
Junior Member

11-11-2016, 12:28 AM

#25

I do that often. Using various benchmarks and figures makes it quite quick. I find it appealing. Quick and efficient!

Albon07

11-11-2016, 12:28 AM #25

I do that often. Using various benchmarks and figures makes it quite quick. I find it appealing. Quick and efficient!

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3